1. 宁波大学 地理与空间信息技术系,浙江,宁波,315211
2. 安徽师范大学 国土资源与旅游学院,安徽,芜湖,241000
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
高超, 陆苗, 姚梦婷, 等. SWIM水文模型在王家坝地区的适用性评估[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(1):152-159.
GAO Chao, LU Miao, YAO Mengting, et al. Applicability Evaluation of the SWIM Hydrological Model in Wangjiaba Region of China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(1): 152-159.
高超, 陆苗, 姚梦婷, 等. SWIM水文模型在王家坝地区的适用性评估[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(1):152-159. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.01.027.
GAO Chao, LU Miao, YAO Mengting, et al. Applicability Evaluation of the SWIM Hydrological Model in Wangjiaba Region of China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(1): 152-159. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.01.027.
[目的
]
评估SWIM水文模型参数值变化对模拟王家坝地区径流精度的影响,为王家坝地区洪涝灾害的预报和减灾提供科学支持,并为SWIM在其他地区应用提供参照。[方法
]
利用王家坝地区率定期(1959-1978年)和验证期(1979-2008年)的实测数据,得到最优参数组合后定量分析SWIM在王家坝地区对7个可率定参数的敏感性。[结果
]
率定期和验证期模拟日径流量纳西效率分别达0.79和0.81,相对误差分别为22%和7.8%。随着参数thc (计算潜在蒸腾时对大气散射率的校准因子)值的增大,相对误差显著下降,其对thc值的敏感性强于纳西系数。roc
4
(河道汇流系数)比roc
2
(河道汇流系数)更能影响日径流,而roc
2
对径流影响汛期大于非汛期。随着参数sccor (饱和传导率校正因子)值的增大,模拟精度在汛期提高非汛期降低。[结论
]
率定后的SWIM模型在王家坝地区适用性良好;SWIM模拟结果在王家坝地区对thc,cnum
1
(曲线数法代码为1时,CN条件1),cnum
3
(曲线数法代码为1时,CN条件3),roc
2
,roc
4
,sccor取值变化比较敏感,对参数bff (基流因子),gwq
()
(初始地下流对径流量的贡献)和abf
()
(地下水阿尔法因子)取值变化不敏感。
[Objective] The paper aims to evaluate the influence of changes in parameters of SWIM (soil and water integrated model) on the simulation accuracy of runoffs in Wangjiaba region
and provides scientific support for flood forecasting and disaster reduction
and provides a reference for the application of SWIM in other areas.[Methods] Based on the measured data at Wangjiaba region during the calibration period (1959-1978) and the validation period (1979-2008)
the optimal parameter combination was obtained
and the sensitivity of SWIM to the seven calibratable parameters in Wangjiaba region was quantitatively analyzed.[Results] The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) coefficients of runoffs in the calibration and validation periods were 0.79 and 0.81
respectively
with relative errors of 22% and 7.8%
respectively. With the increase of the thc parameter (correction factor for potential evapotranspiration on sky emissivity)
the relative error increased significantly
and its sensitivity to the thc value was higher than that of the NSE coefficient. roc4 (river routing coefficient) was more effective than roc2 (river routing coefficient)
while roc2 had a larger effect on runoff in flooding season than in non-flooding season. With the increase of the sccor parameter (correlation factor for saturated conductivity)
the simulation accuracy increased during the flooding season and decreased during the non-flooding season.[Conclusion] The calibrated SWIM model shows good applicability in Wangjiaba region. The results of SWIM simulation in Wangjiaba region are sensitive to variations in the parameters thc
cnum1 (CN condition 1 when the curve number method code is 1)
cnum3 (CN condition 3 when the curve number method code is 1)
roc2
roc4 and sccor
but not to variations in the parameters bff (base flow factor)
gwq() (contribution of initial groundwater flow to runoff) and abf() (groundwater alpha factor).
Shi Zhong, Xiu Qunyang. Ensemble simulations of the urban effect on a summer rainfall event in the Great Beijing Metropolitan Area[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2015,153(3):318-334.
Yang Tao, Wang Xiaoyan, Yu Zhongbo, et al. Climate change and probabilistic scenario of streamflow extremes in an alpine region[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 2014,119(14):8535-8551.
Hesse C, Krysanova V, Stefanova A, et al. Assessment of climate change impacts on water quantity and quality of the multi-river Vistula Lagoon catchment[J]. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2015,60(5):1-22.
Krysanova V, Hattermann F, Huang S, et al. Modelling climate and land use change impacts with SWIM:Lessons learnt from multiple applications[J]. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2015,60(4):606-635.
王怀志,高玉琴,袁玉,等.基于SWAT模型的秦淮河流域气候变化水文响应研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2017,28(1):81-87.
宋增芳,曾建军,金彦兆,等.基于SWAT模型和SUFI-2算法的石羊河流域月径流分布式模拟[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(5):172-177.
黄金柏,王斌,温佳伟,等.基于分布式水文模型的阿伦河流域降雨-径流计算[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(1):224-229.
Gao Jungang, Sheshukov A Y, Yen Haw, et al. Impacts of alternative climate information on hydrologic processes with SWAT:A comparison of NCDC, PRISM and NEXRAD datasets[J]. Catena, 2017,156:353-364.
Ding Jie, Wallner M, Müller H, et al. Estimation of instantaneous peak flows from maximum mean daily flows using the HBV hydrological model[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2016,30(9):1431-1448.
林志强,洪健昌,尼玛吉,等.基于HBV模型的尼洋曲流域上游洪水致灾临界面雨量研究[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(4):22-26.
Romagnoli M, Portapila M, Rigalli A, et al. Assessment of the SWAT model to simulate a watershed with limited available data in the Pampas region, Argentina[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,596:437-450.
王强,许有鹏,高斌,等.西苕溪流域径流对土地利用变化的空间响应分析[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(4):632-641.
Lu Zhuo, Han Dawei. Misrepresentation and amendment of soil moisture in conceptual hydrological modelling[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2016,535:637-651.
黄小祥,姚成,李致家,等.栅格新安江模型在天津于桥水库流域上游的应用[J].湖泊科学,2016,28(5):1134-1140.
Krysannona V, Wechsung F, Arnold,等.SWIM模型使用指南[M].苏布达,曹丽格,翟建青,等译.北京:气象出版社,2011.
杨志远,高超,臧淑英,等.SWIM模型在东北黑土区流域的适用性评价:以乌裕尔河中上游流域为例[J].地理学报,2017,72(3):457-470.
高超,金高洁.SWIM水文模型的DEM尺度效应[J].地理研究,2012,31(3):399-408.
张淑兰,张海军,王彦辉,等.泾河流域上游景观尺度植被类型对水文过程的影响[J].地理科学,2015,35(2):231-237.
谷一,郝振纯,王国庆,等.HBV模型在逊毕拉河流域的适用性研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2017,28(1):20-25.
黄清华,张万昌.SWAT模型参数敏感性分析及应用[J].干旱区地理:中文版,2010,33(1):8-15.
丁飞.SWAT模型小尺度流域模拟的适宜性研究:以淮河上游迎河小流域为例[D].南京:南京农业大学,2007.
0
浏览量
1286
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621