矿区生态修复过程中不同立地类型土壤水动力学特性

苏帅; 杨永刚; 黄磊

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.01.004

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

矿区生态修复过程中不同立地类型土壤水动力学特性

试验研究

- 矿区生态修复过程中不同立地类型土壤水动力学特性
- Dynamic Characteristics of Soil Water in Different Sites During Ecological Restoration in Mining Area
- 水土保持通报 2018年38卷第1期页码：18-23
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 山西大学环境与资源学院,山西,太原,030006
  2. 山西大学黄土高原研究所,山西,太原,030006
  3. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院,甘肃,兰州,730000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“干旱沙区固沙植物生存的生态水文机理研究”（41671076）;中国科学院西部之光项目“植被防护体系活化斑的形成机理及治理”（29Y729801）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.01.004
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
苏帅, 杨永刚, 黄磊. 矿区生态修复过程中不同立地类型土壤水动力学特性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(1):18-23.

SU Shuai, YANG Yonggang, HUANG Lei. Dynamic Characteristics of Soil Water in Different Sites During Ecological Restoration in Mining Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(1): 18-23.
苏帅, 杨永刚, 黄磊. 矿区生态修复过程中不同立地类型土壤水动力学特性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(1):18-23. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.01.004.

SU Shuai, YANG Yonggang, HUANG Lei. Dynamic Characteristics of Soil Water in Different Sites During Ecological Restoration in Mining Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(1): 18-23. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.01.004.

摘要

[目的

]

揭示矿区不同立地土壤水动力学特性及其影响因素，为矿区生态环境恢复治理提供科学依据。[方法

]

基于矿区不同立地类型土壤水分特征曲线、非饱和导水率、孔隙度与紧实度等监测试验，揭示不同立地类型土壤持水性、有效水含量和导水特性等变化规律。[结果

]

土壤持水性和供水性在受损区

修复3a区

修复5a区

修复10a区

修复15a区

未干扰区，但修复区20-40 cm土壤持水性、供水性较0-20 cm土壤低，修复效果不明显；土壤结构改善效果遵循受损区

修复区

未干扰区的变化规律，且修复区亚表层土壤结构改善效果不明显。采用指数函数拟合吸力和非饱和导水率效果较好（r

>0.95），相同吸力下，容重大而非饱和导水率较小；非饱和导水率和容重呈负相关，和孔隙度呈正相关且相关性随吸力增加降低。矿区0-20 cm易有效含水量呈现受损区

修复3a区

修复5a区

修复10a区

未干扰区

修复15a区，但修复区20-40 cm土层易有效水含量较0-20 cm小。[结论

]

土壤易有效水含量和容重、紧实度呈负相关关系，与总孔隙度、黏粒含量呈正相关关系。修复后土壤结构有所改善，持蓄调节水分能力有所提高。

Abstract

[Objective] To investigate the hydrodynamics characteristic of soil water in different sites in the mining area in order to provide a scientific basis for ecological restoration in the mining area.[Methods] The soil water characteristic curves

unsaturated hydraulic conductivity

bulk density

porosity

particle size and compactness were measured to investigate characteristics of soil quality

water-holding capacity

readily available water content and water conductivity in different site types.[Results] The capacity of soil water-holding and water-supplying exhibited as:damaged area < restoration for 3 years area < restoration for 5 years area < restoration for 10 years area < restoration for 15 years area < undamaged area

and soil water-holding capacity and water-supplying capacity at 20-40 cm was lower than that at 0-20 cm

which indicated that remediation effect was not obvious. The improvement of soil structure showed as:damage area < remediation area < undamaged area

and the improvement of subsurface soil quality in remediation area was not obvious. The exponential function fitting between suction and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity was good (r2>0.95). Under the same suction

the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity was smaller as:soil bulk density was greater. There was a negative correlation between unsaturated hydraulic conductivity and bulk density

while a positive correlation between unsaturated hydraulic conductivity and total porosity

and this correlation decreases with the increase of suction. Readily available water content of 0-20 cm exhibited as damage area < restoration for 3 years area < restoration for 5 years area < restoration for 10 years area < undamaged < restoration for 15 years area

and readily available water content of 20-40 cm soil layer was smaller than that of 0-20 cm.[Conclusion] The readily available water content was negatively correlated with bulk density and compactness

and positively correlated with total porosity and clay content. The soil quality and water storage capacity had been improved through restoration progress.

关键词

Keywords

references

张华兵,刘红玉,李玉凤,等.自然条件下盐城海滨湿地土壤水分/盐度空间分异及其与植被关系研究[J].环境科学,2013,34(2):540-546.

解雪峰,濮励杰,朱明,等.土壤水盐运移模型研究进展及展望[J].地理科学,2016,10:1565-1572.

RužiĉicS, Mileusnic M, Posavec K, et al. Water flow and solute transport model of potentially toxic elements through unsaturated zone at regional wellfield Kosnica[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2016,30(22):4113-4124.

Yadav R R, Kumar L K. One-dimensional spatially dependent solute transport in semi-infinite porous media:an analytical solution[J]. 2017,9(4):20.

Olatuyi S O, Akinremi O O, Hao X. Solute transport in a hummocky landscape(Ⅱ):Vertical and seasonal redistribution of bromide and

N-labelled nitrate[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2017,92(4):631-643.

Carrick S, Buchan G, Almond P, et al. Atypical early-time infiltration into a structured soil near field capacity:The dynamic interplay between sorptivity, hydrophobicity, and air encapsulation[J]. Geoderma, 2011,160(3/4):579-589.

Kawamoto K, Moldrup P, Ferré T P A, et al. Linking the gardner and campbell models for water retention and hydraulic conductivity in near-saturated soil[J]. Soil Science, 2015,171(171):573-584.

Akala V A, Lal R. Potential of mine land reclamation for soil organic carbon sequestration in Ohio[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2015,11(3):289-297.

王月玲,王思成,蔡进军,等.半干旱黄土丘陵区退耕地林草植被恢复对土壤质量影响评价[J].水土保通报,2017,37(5):22-26.

焦彩强,王益权,刘军,等.关中地区耕作方法与土壤紧实度时空变异及其效应分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(3):7-12.

杜天庆,苗果园,郝建平,等.不同类型豆科植物对黄土母质生土的改土效果[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(6):76-80,86.

田月亮,张金池,李海东,等.不同林分类型土壤水分物理性质及其海拔效应:以浙江省凤阳山为例[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(1):53-57,61.

邢旭光,赵文刚,马孝义,等.土壤水分特征曲线测定过程中土壤收缩特性研究[J].水利学报,2015,46(10):1181-1188.

Gardner W R, Hillel D, Benyamini Y. Post irrigation movement of soil water(I):Redistribution[J]. Water Resources Research, 1970,6(3):851-861.

刘永光,刘克锋,孙向阳,等.基于土壤水分特征曲线的北京市废弃关停矿山修复效果研究[J].土壤通报.2013,44(1):64-71.

聂小飞,郑海金,左继超,等.枯落物敷盖对红壤坡地土壤水分特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):85-89.

杨永辉,武继承,赵世伟,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区草地土壤持水、供水性能比较[J].土壤通报,2009,40(5):1010-1013.

Hernández M, Echarte L, Maggiora A D, et al. Maize water use efficiency and evapotranspiration response to N supply under contrasting soil water availability[J]. Field Crops Research, 2015,178:8-15.

Li Zhuo, Wu Pute, Feng Hao, et al. Simulated experiment on effects of soil bulk density on soil water holding capacity.[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2010,47(4):611-620.

廖凯华,徐绍辉,吴吉春,等.不同土壤转换函数预测砂土非饱和导水率的对比分析[J].水科学进展,2013,24(4):560-567.

浏览量

1166

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

戈壁矿区风力侵蚀及水土保持对策探讨

辽宁省矿区水土保持生态建设分区研究

任楼矿区塌陷土地复垦规划与利用现状研究

土壤水下渗解析解与数值解的比较研究

基于理想点法的矿区生态环境敏感性评价