1. 西南大学 地理科学学院,重庆,400715
2. 南京大学 地理与海洋科学学院,江苏,南京,210023
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
吴艳飞, 徐羽, 徐刚. 近14年安徽省耕地资源安全的时空特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(6):236-241.
WU Yanfei, XU Yu, XU Gang. Spatiotemporal Characteristics in Cultivated Land Resources Security in Anhui Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(6): 236-241.
吴艳飞, 徐羽, 徐刚. 近14年安徽省耕地资源安全的时空特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(6):236-241. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.06.040.
WU Yanfei, XU Yu, XU Gang. Spatiotemporal Characteristics in Cultivated Land Resources Security in Anhui Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(6): 236-241. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.06.040.
[目的]探究近14 a安徽省耕地资源安全时空特征,为安徽省社会经济发展和耕地保护提供依据。[方法]从耕地资源数量、质量和生态安全3个方面选取27个评价指标,构建耕地资源综合安全评价体系。[结果]①安徽省耕地数量和质量安全程度分别呈下降和上升趋势,生态安全等级较为稳定,综合安全呈缓慢上升趋势;②耕地资源数量安全总体呈皖东、皖北高于皖南的空间格局;质量安全呈现皖中、皖南高于皖北的特征;生态安全表现为皖中部和皖南较低,其余较高的空间格局;综合安全与数量安全空间分布具有相似性,且在时间上,低安全等级地市呈现"集中-分散"的空间特征,高安全程度地市反之。③近14 a安徽省耕地资源数量、质量和生态安全的主要障碍因子具有明显的时间变化特征。[结论]安徽省耕地资源安全情况不容乐观,各地区需因地制宜,提高安全保障程度。
[Objective] The spatio-temporal characteristics of cultivated land resources security in Anhui Province in recent 14 years were illustrated
in order to provide directions for economic development and land resource protection.[Methods] In terms of 27 selected indicators from three aspects as quantitative security
qualitative security and ecological security
an integrated assessment system of cultivated land resources was established.[Results] ① The quantitative and qualitative security of cultivated land resources showed decreasing and increasing trends
respectively. Ecology security remained stable
and the integrated security showed an upward trend. ② The spatial characteristics of quantitative security showed high values in the east and North of Anhui Province and low values in the South of Anhui Province; the values of qualitative security were higher in the middle and south of Anhui Province; moreover
the ecological security in the middle and south regions was lower than that in other areas; the spatial characteristics of integrated security of cultivated land resources was similar to that of quantitative security. The cities with low integrated security levels presented a characteristics of concentration to dispersal
and it was opposite for the high integrated security level cities. ③ The main obstacle factors of quantitative
qualitative and ecological security of cultivated land resources showed an obvious variation features.[Conclusion] The situation of the cultivated land resources security in Anhui Province was still severe. Appropriate method
therefore
should be taken to improve the level of security.
贾绍凤,张豪禧,孟向京.我国耕地变化趋势与对策再探讨[J].地理科学进展,1997,16(1):24-30.
陈百明.中国土地资源生产能力及人口承载量研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.
Rutherford H P. The farmland conversion debate:Nals and beyond[J]. Professional Geographer, 1985,37(4):433-442.
Jeffrey A. Lockwood. Agriculture and biodiversity:Finding our place in this world[J]. Agriculture and Human Values, 1999,16(4):365-379.
David L T. The City's Countryside:Land and Its Management in the Rural Urban Fringe[M]. London:Longman, 2003.
朴钟相.中韩耕地利用法律制度比较研究[D].辽宁沈阳:辽宁大学,2014.
王逸舟.全球化时代的国际安全[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1999.
谷树忠.试论中国资源安全问题[N].北京:中国科学报,19981202(2).
王礼茂,郎一环.中国资源安全研究的进展及问题[J].地理科学进展,2002(4):333-335.
何蓓蓓.区域耕地资源安全研究:以江苏省为例[D].江苏南京:南京工业大学,2010.
杨齐,干晓宇,李建龙,等.张家港市耕地资源安全与城市化时空动态分析[J].自然资源学报,2001,25(8):1274-1283.
宋伟,陈百明,史文娇,等.2007年中国耕地资源安全评价[J].地理科学进展,2011,30(11):1449-1455.
张锐,郑华伟.基于PSR模型的耕地生态安全物元分析评价[J].生态学报,2013,33(16):5090-5100.
奉婷,张凤荣.基于耕地质量综合评价的县域基本农田空间布局[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(1):200-207.
吴艳飞,徐羽,徐刚,等.2012年安徽省耕地资源安全综合评价[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2016,41(1):124-131.
张平平,鲁成树.安徽省沿江地区耕地利用集约度及粮食安全相关分析[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(3):202-207.
徐京京,黄建武,李丹,等.安徽省耕地压力指数时空分布特征及趋势预测[J].华中师范大学学报:自然科学版,2015,49(4):615-622.
何蓓蓓,何兵.安徽省耕地资源安全保障与对策研究[J].农业现代化研究,2011,32(2):157-160.
王龙.重庆市综合灾害模糊风险评价[D].重庆:西南大学,2014.
0
浏览量
2428
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621