合肥工业大学 土木与水利工程学院,安徽,合肥,230009
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
徐得潜, 张伟. 乡村河道生态护坡评价方法[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(6):197-201.
XU Deqian, ZHANG Wei. Comprehensive Evaluation Methods of Rural River Ecological Revetments[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(6): 197-201.
徐得潜, 张伟. 乡村河道生态护坡评价方法[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(6):197-201. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.06.033.
XU Deqian, ZHANG Wei. Comprehensive Evaluation Methods of Rural River Ecological Revetments[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(6): 197-201. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.06.033.
[目的]探讨乡村河道生态护坡的评价方法,为提高新农村建设中乡村河道生态综合治理水平提供支持。[方法]从生态护坡成本、施工材料、对基本水利功能影响、生态功能和社会景观功能等5个方面系统地构建平原、丘陵和山区3种乡村河道生态护坡综合评价体系,利用层次分析法确定这3种乡村河道生态护坡指标权重,并运用秩和比法对生态护坡进行评价。[结果]对生态石笼护坡、生态混凝土护坡、植物护坡、木桩护坡、山石护坡、生态砖挡墙和生态袋护坡等7种生态护坡进行选择并在3种不同乡村河道下进行综合评价,确定出生态砖挡墙和植物护坡适用于十五里河中下游河段,其加权秩和比值(WRSR)值分别为0.692 3和0.662 2;生态砖挡墙和生态混凝土护坡适用于慈湖河采石段,其WRSR值分别为0.663 5和0.659 0;生态混凝土护坡和生态石笼护坡适用于九华河上游段,其WRSR分别为0.551 6和0.537 8。[结论]该评价体系的评价结果较为合理,可用于改善和提高乡村河道生态护坡的建设水平。
[Objective] To comprehensively evaluate the ecological revetments of rural river
in order to improve the comprehensive level of ecological management of rural rivers in the construction of new countryside.[Methods] Comprehensive evaluation systems of ecological rural river revetments in plains
hills and mountain areas were built from five aspects
namely:cost
construction materials
effects on the function of water conservancy
ecological function and social landscape features. Index weights of ecological rural river revetments in the three areas above mentioned were calculated using analytic hierarchy process and the ecological revetments were evaluated using rank-sum ratio.[Results] Seven kinds of ecological revetments
including ecological stone cage revetment
ecological concrete revetment
plant revetment
timber revetment
rock revetment
ecological brick retaining wall and ecological bag revetment
were chosen to be comprehensively evaluated in three kinds of rural rivers. It was concluded that the ecological rick retaining wall and the plant revetment are suitable for the middle and lower reaches of Shiwuli River
their indexes of WRSR are 0.692 3 and 0.662 2; the ecological brick retaining wall and the ecological concrete revetment are suitable for the Caishi section of Cihu River
their indexes of WRSR are 0.663 5 and 0.659 0; and the ecological concrete revetment and the ecological stone cage revetment are suitable for the upstream of Jiuhua River
their indexes of WRSR are 0.551 6 and 0.537 8.[Conclusion] The result of this evaluation system is reasonable and can be used to improve the construction level of ecological revetments of rural river.
谢三桃.农村河道治理中的护坡材料及技术应用实例[J].水资源保护,2015,31(1):35-40.
刘萌.城镇河道生态护坡材料筛选及其生态健康评价研究[D].山东济南:山东师范大学,2013.
许士国,石瑞花,黄保国,等.平原河道生态护坡工程评价和方案决策方法[J].水利学报,2008(3):325-331.
柴纯纯,徐得潜,张浏,等.基于模糊层次-主成分分析法的城市河道生态护坡综合评价[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(5):167-171,177.
王梅婷,徐得潜,陈凯.城市河道生态护坡综合评价指标体系研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(1):198-202.
王新征.建设项目施工期间环境成本的确定和控制方法[J].南阳师范学院学报,2016(3):29-32.
郭庆军,赛云秀.生态视角下绿色施工系统研究[J].建筑经济,2012(10):93-96.
赫晓磊.山丘区生态河道设计方法研究[D].江苏扬州:扬州大学,2008.
王宏涛.丘陵区城市河流生态修复研究[D].河南郑州:郑州大学,2011.
夏继红,严忠明.生态河岸带综合评价理论与修复技术[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2009.
荣冰凌,陈春娣,邓红兵.城市绿色空间综合评价指标体系构建及应用[J].城市环境与城市生态,2009,22(1):33-37.
张臻,王龙昌,杨松,孙凡,等.基于AHP法的四川省水资源可持续利用综合评价[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(4):213-218.
刘荣增,耿纯.基于AHP的城市景观生态评价与优化:以开封市为例[J].国土与自然资源研究,2012(3):57-59.
杜栋,庞庆华,吴炎.现代综合评价方法与案例精选[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2015.
马云倩.基于熵权秩和比法的马铃薯营养价值评价研究[J].中国农业科技导报,2016,18(6):175-180.
毛玮.几种典型综合评价方法的比较及SAS软件实现[D].北京:中国人民解放军军事医学科学院,2011.
胡斌,章仁俊.基于秩和比法的区域科技发展水平比较研究[J].工业技术经济,2004,23(6):55-57.
0
浏览量
1543
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621