合肥工业大学 土木与水利工程学院,安徽,合肥,230009
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
徐得潜, 夏鲲鹏. 乡村河道生态修复技术评价与选择[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(6):184-188.
XU Deqian, XIA Kunpeng. Evaluation and Selection of Ecological Restoration Technology in Rural River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(6): 184-188.
徐得潜, 夏鲲鹏. 乡村河道生态修复技术评价与选择[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(6):184-188. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.06.031.
XU Deqian, XIA Kunpeng. Evaluation and Selection of Ecological Restoration Technology in Rural River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(6): 184-188. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.06.031.
[目的]探讨乡村河道生态修复技术综合评价方法,为乡村河道生态修复技术选择提供理论依据。[方法]采用模糊层次综合评价法,从经济效益、社会及生态环境效益、对河道基本功能的影响、污染情况、自然条件等5个方面,系统地构建了乡村河道生态修复技术评价的指标体系。[结果]合肥市派河紫蓬镇河段4种生态修复技术综合评价值分别为:植物修复85.058,河道曝气70.255,人工湿地73.456,生态浮床68.018,表明应选择植物修复技术进行生态修复。[结论]应用模糊层次分析法所建立的生态修复技术评价体系全面客观,结合所确定的选择标准可为乡村河道选择适宜的生态修复技术提供参考。
[Objective] The objective of this paper was to discuss the evaluation method of rural river ecological restoration technology
and to provide theoretical basis for the ecological restoration of rural river.[Methods] Considering economic benefits
social and ecological environmental benefits
the impact of river basic functions
pollution and natural conditions
this paper established an index system of comprehensive assessment on the ecological restoration of rural river by fuzzy analytic hierarchy process(FAHP).[Results] The comprehensive assessment values of four kinds of ecological restoration technologies of Zipeng Town reach of Paihe River in Hefei City were as follows:the evaluation values of phytoremediation
river aeration
constructed wetlands and ecological floating bed were 85.058
70.255
73.456 and 68.018 respectively. Phytoremediation was determined to be adopted for the ecological restoration.[Conclusion] The application of ecological restoration technology assessment system established by the FAHP was comprehensive and objective. If combined with the decided selection criteria
it can provide references for the selection of appropriate ecological restoration technology of rural river.
韩黎.生态河道治理模式及其评价方法研究[D].辽宁大连:大连理工大学,2010.
吴林林.黑臭河道净化试验研究及综合治理工程应用[D].上海:华东师范大学,2007.
孙卫星,汪翙.浅议受污染水体生态修复技术[J].环境科学与技术,2003,26(S2):108-110.
Cui Baoshan, Yang Oichun, Yang Zhifeng, et al. Evaluating the ecological performance of wetland restoration in the Yellow River Delta, China[J].Ecological Engineering, 2009,35(7):190-1103.
Cui Zhencai, Yang Yongzhen, Gao Xiaoli, et al. Research and application of ecological river courses restoration technology[J]. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2016,39(1):12-40.
李兴德,颜宏亮,李浩宇,等.城镇河道生态修复方案评价模型构建[C].北京:全国河道治理与生态修复技术汇总,2012.
贾秀粉.城市河道生态修复规划、效果评价及生物控藻技术[D].天津:南开大学,2011.
庞翠超,陶静,吴小慧,等.强感潮河网生态治理工程综合评价[J].人民长江,2016,47(1):15-22.
刘培斌,沈来新,刘俊国,等.基于生态服务价值的永定河(北京段)生态修复效果评价[J].水利水电技术,2016,47(4):9-13.
胡孟春,张永春,唐晓燕,等.城市河道近自然修复评价体系与方法及其在镇江古运河的应用[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2010,18(2):187-196.
张广萍,周美正,张延,等.安徽派河流域水污染特征及原因分析[J].人民长江,2014(18):20-24.
马农乐,赵中极.基于层次分析法及其改进对确定权重系数的分析[J].水利科技与经济,2006,12(11):732-736.
梁保松,曹殿立.模糊数学及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2007:105-120.
王梅婷,徐得潜,陈凯.城市河道生态护坡综合评价指标体系研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(1):198-202.
刘学毅.德尔菲法在交叉学科研究评价中的运用[J].西南交通大学学报:社会科学版,2007,8(2):21-25.
徐联舫.用德尔菲专家调查法对超导量子干涉仪的技术预测[J].科学学研究,1989,7(1):68-86.
冯晖,王志中.基于专家评价准确度的评估数据处理方法研究[J].学位与研究生教育,2002(7/8):59-60.
0
浏览量
860
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621