海坛岛土地利用变化模拟与景观生态风险评价

杨阳; 黄义雄; 李潇; 古璠; 郭佳蕾

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.06.024

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

海坛岛土地利用变化模拟与景观生态风险评价

试验研究

- 海坛岛土地利用变化模拟与景观生态风险评价
- Land Use Change Simulation and Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment of Haitan Island
- 水土保持通报 2017年37卷第6期页码：146-151
- 作者机构：
  
  福建师范大学地理科学学院,福建,福州,350007
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  福州市政府研究项目“福州市生态文明建设研究”（CO0062）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.06.024
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
杨阳, 黄义雄, 李潇, 等. 海坛岛土地利用变化模拟与景观生态风险评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(6):146-151.

YANG Yang, HUANG Yixiong, LI Xiao, et al. Land Use Change Simulation and Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment of Haitan Island[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(6): 146-151.
杨阳, 黄义雄, 李潇, 等. 海坛岛土地利用变化模拟与景观生态风险评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(6):146-151. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.06.024.

YANG Yang, HUANG Yixiong, LI Xiao, et al. Land Use Change Simulation and Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment of Haitan Island[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(6): 146-151. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.06.024.

摘要

[目的]对海坛岛土地利用变化进行模拟与景观生态风险评价，为该岛的土地利用规划和政策制定提供理论依据。[方法]在福建省平潭县综合试验区规划建设的背景下，将Markov模型和CLUE-S模型相结合，模拟海坛岛2021年自然发展模式和城市规划发展模式下的土地利用空间分布格局，并用景观指数和景观生态风险指数对不同模式的景观格局进行分析。[结果]① 2021年的预测结果与2013年土地利用状况相比，在自然发展模式下森林、灌丛、湿地、农田分别减少了9.58%，5.53%，2.33%和8.82%。城市规划模式下分别减少了12.86%，6.16%，2.40%和11.67%；建筑用地面积自然发展模式下增加了24.56%；城市规划模式下增加了31.79%。②海坛岛的景观斑块破碎化程度日趋严重，森林、灌丛、湿地、农田、建设用地和未利用地的斑块数目均有不同程度的增加，景观面积百分比和景观形状指数上，森林、灌丛、湿地、农田均呈下降趋势，建设用地呈上升状态，未利用地变化不大。③海坛岛2013和2021年两种不同发展模式下的景观生态风险指数分别为0.334，0.337和0.351。[结论]海坛岛整体景观趋于破碎化和离散化，景观生态风险指数呈上升趋势，景观生态问题日渐严重。

Abstract

[Objective] Simulating the land use change and evaluating the landscape ecological risk of Haitan Island

to provide basis for land use planning and policy development.[Methods] Under the background of planning and constructing in Pingtan County Experimental Area in Fujian Province

this study combined the model of Markov model and the CLUE-S model to simulate spatial distribution pattern of land use in 2021

under the scenarios of either spontaneously developing pattern or rapid urbanization development. The possible evolved landscape patterns under different development scenarios were predicted by landscape index and landscape ecological risk index.[Results] ① The forecast results of 2021 are compared to the land use situation in 2013. The areas of forest

shrub

wetland

farmland decreased by 9.58%

5.53%

2.33%

8.82%

respectively under the scenario of spontaneous development mode; while

these items decreased by 12.86%

6.16%

2.40%

11.67% in the rapid urbanization development scenario. Construction land areas increased by 24.56% and 31.79% in scenarios of spontaneous development and rapid urban development. ② Haitan island landscape patch fragmentation will becoming increasingly serious. The numbers of plaques in forests

shrubs

wetlands

croplands

construction sites and unused land increased differently; the construction land will on the rise but the unused land might change little. ③ The landscape ecological risk indexes were 0.334

0.337

0.351 in 2013 and under different development models in 2021.[Conclusion] The whole landscape of Haitan Island tends to be broken and discretized. Landscape ecological risk index is on the rise and the degree of fragmentation of landscape patches is becoming more and more serious.

关键词

Keywords

references

Sohl T L, Claggett P R. Clarity versus complexity:Land-use modeling as a practical tool for decision-makers[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013,129(C):235-243.

Foley J A, Defries R, Asner G P, et al. Global consequences of land use[J]. Science, 2005,309(5734):570-574.

吴文斌,杨鹏,唐华俊,等.土地利用对土壤性质影响的区域差异研究[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(8):1697-1702.

Liu J, Diamond J. China's environment in a globalizing world[J]. Nature, 2005,435(7046):1179.

于兴修,杨桂山,王瑶.土地利用/覆被变化的环境效应研究进展与动向[J].地理科学,2004,24(5):627-633.

陈佑启,杨鹏.国际上土地利用/土地覆盖变化研究的新进展[J].经济地理,2001,21(1):95-100.

秦丽杰,张郁,许红梅,等.土地利用变化的生态环境效应研究:以前郭县为例[J].地理科学,2002,22(4):508-512.

邬建国.景观生态学中的十大研究论题[J].生态学报,2004,24(9):2074-2076.

Matthews R B, Gilbert N G, Roach A, et al. Agent-based land-use models:A review of applications[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2007,22(10):1447-1459.

Brömmelstroet M T. Equip the warrior instead of manning the equipment:Land use and transport planning support in the Netherlands[J]. Journal of Transport & Land Use, 2010,3(1):25-41.

Verburg P H, Koning G H J D, Kok K, et al. A spatial explicit allocation procedure for modelling the pattern of land use change based upon actual land use[J]. Ecological Modelling, 1999,116(1):45-61.

Veldkamp A, Lambin E F. Predicting land-use change[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2001,85(1/3):1-6.

Jiang Weiguo, Chen Zheng, Lei Xuan, et al. Simulating urban land use change by incorporating an autologistic regression model into a CLUE-S model[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2015,25(7):836-850.

冯仕超,高小红,顾娟,等.基于CLUE-S模型的湟水流域土地利用空间分布模拟[J].生态学报,2013,33(3):985-997.

潘影,刘云慧,王静,等.基于CLUE-S模型的密云县面源污染控制景观安全格局分析[J].生态学报,2011,31(2):529-537.

摆万奇,张永民,阎建忠,等.大渡河上游地区土地利用动态模拟分析[J].地理研究,2005,24(2):206-212.

Peng Jian, Cai Yunlong, P. H. Verburg.Simulation of land use/cover change scenarios in karst mountain areas[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2007,23(7):64-70.

Zheng Xinqi, Zhao Lu, Hu Yecui, et al. Spatio-temporal allocation of general land-use planning index.[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010, 6(4):297-305(9).

王丽艳,张学儒,张华,等. CLUE-S模型原理与结构及其应用进展[J].地理与地理信息科学,2010,26(3):73-77.

张永民,赵士洞, P. H. Verburg. CLUE-S模型及其在奈曼旗土地利用时空动态变化模拟中的应用[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(3):310-318.

曾永年,何丽丽,靳文凭,等.长株潭城市群核心区城镇景观空间扩张过程定量分析[J].地理科学,2012,32(5):544-549.

谢花林.基于景观结构和空间统计学的区域生态风险分析[J].生态学报,2008,28(10):5020-5026.

曾永年,靳文凭,王慧敏,等.青海高原东部土地利用变化模拟与景观生态风险评价[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(4):185-194.

谢花林.基于景观结构和空间统计学的区域生态风险分析[J].生态学报,2008,28(10):5020-5026.

浏览量

1037

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

土地利用方式及土壤理化性质对有效态锌累积的影响

四川省汶川地震灾区震后山地灾害综合风险评价

有机化工污染场地修复后的再利用风险评价

喀斯特地区土地石漠化风险及评价指标体系

黔西北喀斯特区域土地利用/覆盖变化对土壤侵蚀的影响