黔中喀斯特区典型土地利用方式及耕作措施的水土流失调控效应

李瑞; 李勇; 熊康宁; 张弛; 文雅琴

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.06.022

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

黔中喀斯特区典型土地利用方式及耕作措施的水土流失调控效应

试验研究

- 黔中喀斯特区典型土地利用方式及耕作措施的水土流失调控效应
- Regulating Effects on Soil and Water Loss of Typical Slope Land Use Patterns and Tillage Methods in Karst Area of Central Guizhou Province
- 水土保持通报 2017年37卷第6期页码：136-140
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 贵州师范大学喀斯特研究院,贵州,贵阳,550001
  2. 国家喀斯特石漠化防治工程技术研究中心,贵州,贵阳,550001
  3. 贵州省水土保持监测站,贵州,贵阳,550002
  4. 盘州市老厂国有林场, 贵州盘州,553537
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“喀斯特区典型石漠化坡耕地覆盖措施水土流失调控效应”（31760243）;贵州省科技计划项目（黔科合社G字[2012]4008）;贵州省林业厅科研课题（黔林科合[2017]13号）;贵州师范大学2017年博士科研启动项目
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.06.022
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李瑞, 李勇, 熊康宁, 等. 黔中喀斯特区典型土地利用方式及耕作措施的水土流失调控效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(6):136-140.

LI Rui, LI Yong, XIONG Kangning, et al. Regulating Effects on Soil and Water Loss of Typical Slope Land Use Patterns and Tillage Methods in Karst Area of Central Guizhou Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(6): 136-140.
李瑞, 李勇, 熊康宁, 等. 黔中喀斯特区典型土地利用方式及耕作措施的水土流失调控效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(6):136-140. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.06.022.

LI Rui, LI Yong, XIONG Kangning, et al. Regulating Effects on Soil and Water Loss of Typical Slope Land Use Patterns and Tillage Methods in Karst Area of Central Guizhou Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(6): 136-140. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.06.022.

摘要

[目的]探讨贵州省中部喀斯特地区坡面几种典型土地利用类型及耕作措施对土壤水分、土壤侵蚀及坡面径流的调控效应，探明其差异显著性，为区域坡面水土流失防治提供参考。[方法]采用野外径流小区定位观测法，以贵州省龙里县羊鸡冲小流域及贵阳修文龙场小流域为研究对象，开展坡面不同土地利用及耕作方式水土流失调控效应的研究。[结果]林地、撂荒地及农耕地对土壤水分的调控效应差异不显著（p > 0.05），对土壤侵蚀的调控效应差异显著（p < 0.05）。3种土地利用方式对径流的调控效应相对复杂，具体为撂荒地显著低于林地（p < 0.05），但林地与农耕地间、撂荒地与农耕地间均无显著差异（p > 0.05）；两种典型耕作措施研究结果显示，蔬菜种植（春甘蓝）对土壤水分、水土流失的调控效应优于玉米种植（单作），但两者对土壤水分及水土流失的调控效应均无显著差异（p > 0.05）。[结论]黔中喀斯特区3种土地利用方式中，撂荒地水土流失调控效应显著高于林地和耕地；蔬菜种植水土流失调控效应高于玉米单作，但是两者无显著差异（p > 0.05）。

Abstract

[Objective] This study aimed to explore the regulating effects of different slope land use patterns and tillage methods on soil moisture and soil & water loss in karst area of Central Guizhou Province

and to provide references for soil & water conservation on karst hillslope.[Methods] Yangjichong small watershed in Longli County

Longchang small watershed in Xiuwen County were took as the research areas

and the soil moisture

runoff and soil erosion were observed by using runoff plot method.[Results] The soil moistures among forestland

abandoned land and farmland were not significantly different(p > 0.05)

though soil erosion was significantly different(p < 0.05). The effects on runoff among forestland

abandoned land and farmland were relatively complicated:runoff on abandoned land was significantly lower than the ones on forestland(p < 0.05); while there were no significant differences between forestland and farmland

and between abandoned land and farmland(p > 0.05). The study results of 2 typical tillage methods on soil moisture and soil & water loss indicated that the regulating effects of vegetable planted(spring cabbage) were better than the one of corn planted(monocrop)

however

there were no significant differences between these 2 tillage methods on soil moisture and soil & water loss(p > 0.05).[Conclusion] Among the 3 different land use patterns

abandoned land had significant effect on soil and water conservation as compared to the ones of forestland and farmland in karst area of central Guizhou Province

and there was no significant difference between vegetable planted and planted corn.

关键词

Keywords

references

熊康宁,朱大运,彭韬,等.喀斯特高原石漠化综合治理生态产业技术与示范研究[J].生态学报,2016,36(22):7109-7113.

熊康宁,李晋,龙明忠.典型喀斯特石漠化治理区水土流失特征与关键问题[J].地理学报,2012,67(7):878-888.

袁道先,章程.岩溶动力学的理论探索与实践[J].地球学报,2008,29(3):355-365.

李瑞,刘瑞禄,吕涛,等.贵州省喀斯特地区典型小流域不同种植模式坡面径流产沙研究[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(5):132-135.

朱青,陈正刚,李剑,等.贵州坡耕地三种种植模式的水土保持效果对比研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(4):22-25.

颜萍,熊康宁,檀迪,等.喀斯特石漠化治理不同水土保持模式的生态效应研究[J].贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版,2016(01):1-7,21.

赵一鹤,杨时宇,周祥,等.巨尾桉工业原料林地与不同土地利用类型坡面产流产沙特征对比分析[J]. 水土保持通报,2012,32(1):77-81,88.

沈奕彤,郭成久,金珊,等.土壤容重对黑土坡面养分流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(1):26-30.

Newaj R, Chaturvedi O P, Handa A K. Recent development in agroforestry research and its role in climate change adaptation and mitigation[J]. Indian Journal of Agroforestry, 2016,18(1):1-9.

Sepúlveda R B, Carrillo A A. Soil erosion and erosion thresholds in an agroforestry system of coffee(

Coffea arabica

)and mixed shade trees(

Inga

spp and

Musa

spp)in Northern Nicaragua[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2015,210(6):25-35.

Murungu F S, Chiduza C, Muchaonyerwa P, et al. Mulch effects on soil moisture and nitrogen, weed growth and irrigated maize productivity in a warm-temperate climate of South Africa[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2011,112(1):58-65.

Mwango S, Msanya B, Mtakwa P W, et al. Effectiveness of mulching under miraba in controlling soil erosion, fertility restoration and crop yield in the usambara mountains, Tanzania[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2014,27(4):1266-1275.

Salah A M A, Prasse R, Marschner B. Intercropping with native perennial plants protects soil of arable fields in semi-arid lands[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2016,130(7):1-13.

Prosdocimi M, Jordán A, Tarolli P, et al. The immediate effectiveness of barley straw mulch in reducing soil erodibility and surface runoff generation in Mediterranean vineyards[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016,547(5):323-330.

Kairis O, Karavitis C, Kounalaki A, et al. The effect of land management practices on soil erosion and land desertification in an olive grove[J]. Soil Use and Management, 2013,29(4):597-606.

Zhang Shulan, Li Pingru, Yang Xueyun, et al. Effects of tillage and plastic mulch on soil water, growth and yield of spring-sown maize[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2011,112(1):92-97.

顾再柯,刘凤仙.贵州省水土保持监测点径流小区存在问题与优化对策[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(2):18-20.

刘凤仙,覃莉,顾再柯.贵州省水土保持监测点的运行和管理[J].中国水土保持,2012(6):59-61.

浏览量

1301

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于文献计量学的1993—2023年水土流失监测技术研究进展

皖西大别山区土壤抗蚀与抗冲特征及其影响因素

兰新铁路风沙区提速改建工程对水土流失的影响及防治措施

黄土丘陵区坡耕地土地退化研究

新疆喀什噶尔河流域克孜河下游水土流失现状及对策