1. 西安理工大学 西北旱区生态水利工程国家重点实验室,陕西,西安,710048
2. 河南省新乡市水文水资源勘测局,河南,新乡,353000
3. 黄委会西峰水土保持科学试验站, 甘肃 西峰,745000
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
李蓝君, 宋孝玉, 夏露, 等. 黄土沟壑区不同树龄侧柏林地土壤水分动态特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(6):92-100.
LI Lanjun, SONG Xiaoyu, XIA Lu, et al. Dynamic Characteristics of Soil Moisture for Different Age of Platycladus Orientalis in Gully Region of Loess Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(6): 92-100.
李蓝君, 宋孝玉, 夏露, 等. 黄土沟壑区不同树龄侧柏林地土壤水分动态特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(6):92-100. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.06.015.
LI Lanjun, SONG Xiaoyu, XIA Lu, et al. Dynamic Characteristics of Soil Moisture for Different Age of Platycladus Orientalis in Gully Region of Loess Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(6): 92-100. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.06.015.
[目的]研究黄土沟壑区侧柏林地土壤水分动态特征,为黄土沟壑区退耕还林、生态建设以及人工侧柏林地的经营管理工作提供支持。[方法]以黄土沟壑区典型小流域南小河沟流域内5,25以及35 a树龄侧柏为研究对象,使用烘干法对其生长季0-100 cm土层土壤水分进行观测,并对其时空分布特征、土壤层次以及各层次干燥化特征进行分析。[结果]①降雨对侧柏林地土壤水分的补给深度集中在0-40 cm范围内,侧柏根系吸水主要作用范围则分布在40-100 cm土层中。② 3种树龄侧柏生长季0-100 cm土层中的土壤水分的时间变化可以分为恢复期(5月)与消耗期(6-9月)。在恢复期,树龄对于土壤水分分布的影响不大,5,25与35 a侧柏0-100 cm土层蓄水量分别分布在230.3~304.2 mm,177.7~249.7 mm以及202.2~283.6 mm。在消耗期,10-40 cm土层中,土壤水分分布表现为:5 a侧柏 > 35 a侧柏 > 25 a侧柏,而在60-100 cm土层中,则表现为:5 a侧柏 > 25 a侧柏 > 35 a;3种树龄侧柏林地0-100 cm土层蓄水量则分布在131.2~207.2 mm,123.4~220.8 mm以及109.6~204.7 mm。③在恢复期,5 a侧柏林地各垂直分层土壤水分干燥化指数(SDI)差异不大,25与35 a侧柏林地SDI在活跃层与过渡层随着深度的增大而增大。在根系作用层,25与35 a侧柏林地SDI保持相对稳定。在消耗期,3种树龄侧柏林地SDI在活跃层较小,在过渡层随深度增大而增大,而在根系作用层保持相对稳定。[结论]与恢复期相比,在消耗期,3种树龄侧柏林地土壤水分变化剧烈程度均显著增大,其根系吸水能力随树龄增大而增大。
[Objective] Studying of dynamic characteristics of soil water in the gully region of Loess Plateau is very important to provide supports for the constructions of forest
ecological restoration and management of Platycladus orientalis.[Methods] Sites of 5
25 and 35 a Platycladus orientalis in typical small basin(Nanxiaohegou basin) in the gully region of Loess Plateau were selected
where the soil moistures in growing season were observed with drying method. On the basis of this
the spatial and temporal distributions of soil moisture in different layers and the desiccation characteristics of each layer were analyzed.[Results] ① The rainfall recharged depth on soil moisture of the Platycladus orientalis concentrated in 0-40 cm while the effect of Platycladus orientalis' roots on soil moisture concentrated in 40-100 cm. ② The temporal variation of 0-100 cm soil moisture during growth season can be divided into recovery period(May) and depletion period(Jun. to Sept.). In the recovery period
the age of the Platycladus orientalis had little effect on soil water distribution. The water storages of 5 a
25 a and 35 a Platycladus orientalis in 0-100 cm varied between 230.3~304.2 mm
177.7~249.7 mm and 202.2~283.6 mm
respectively. In the depletion period
the soil moistures of 10-40 cm in different sites ranked:5 a > 35 a > 25 a; while in 60-100 cm
the rank was 5 a > 25 a > 35 a. The 3 sites' water storages of 0-100 cm varied between 131.2~207.2 mm
123.4~220.8 mm and 109.6~204.7 mm
respectively. ③ In the recovery period
there was little difference for the SDIs among different soil layers; while the SDIs in the active layer and transition layer of 25 a and 35 a sites increased with the increase of depth. For root affected layer
its value was relatively stable. In the depletion period
SDI value of the Platycladus orientalis was smaller in the active layer and increased with the increase of depth in the transition layer. For the root layer
the value was relatively stable.[Conclusion] As compared with it in the recovery period
the change degree of soil moisture increased significantly in the depletion period
and the absorption capacity of root increased in older Platycladus orientalis site.
赵传普,徐学选,高朝侠,等.黄土丘陵区不同植被类型下土壤水分动态[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(1):68-72.
Gad M R M, Kelan S S. Soil seed bank and seed germination of sand dunes vegetation in North Sinai-Egypt[J]. Annals of Agricultural Sciences, 2012,57(1):63-72.
Wang Yunqing, Shao Mingan, Shao Hongbo. A preliminary investigation of the dynamic characteristics of dried soil layers on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2010,381(1/2):9-17.
刘宪锋,任志远,张翀,等.1959-2008年黄土高原地区年内降水集中度和集中期时空变化特征[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(9):1157-1163.
郭敏杰,张亭亭,张建军,等.1982-2006年黄土高原地区植被覆盖度对气候变化的响应[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(5):35-40.
王舒,马岚,张栋.晋西黄土区不同林龄人工刺槐林下植被及土壤水分特征[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2016,52(3):253-258.
韩磊.黄土半干旱区主要造林树种蒸腾耗水及冠层蒸腾模拟研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2011:1-2.
王丹丹.晋西黄土高原不同植被覆盖下的土壤抗冲性研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2014:3-4.
张建军,李慧敏,徐佳佳.黄土高原水土保持林对土壤水分的影响[J].生态学报,2011,31(23):7056-7066.
郭忠升,邵明安.黄土丘陵半干旱区柠条锦鸡儿人工林对土壤水分的影响[J].林业科学,2010,46(12):1-7.
杨光,荣丽媛.黄土高原沟壑区人工植被类型对土壤水分和碳氮的影响[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(6):30-33.
赵荣玮,张建军,李玉婷,等.晋西黄土区人工林地土壤水分特征及其对降雨的响应[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(1):178-183.
程东娟,张亚丽.土壤物理试验指导[M].北京:水利水电出版社,2012:68-79.
张义,谢永生,郝明德.黄土高原沟壑区苹果园土壤水分特征分析[J].土壤,2011,43(2):293-298.
包睿,邹养军,马锋旺,等.种植年限及密度对渭北旱塬苹果园深层土壤干燥化的影响[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(15):143-149.
李军,陈兵,李小芳,等.黄土高原不同干旱类型区苜蓿草地深层土壤干燥化效应[J].生态学报,2007,27(1):75-88.
王爱娟,章文波.林冠截留降雨研究综述[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(4):55-59.
李伟平,孙菽芬,刘新,等.阿尔卑斯山杉林冠层影响辐射传输的个例分析[J].高原气象,2008,27(4):749-756.
赵梦启,高满,陈喜,等.不同覆被下的温度日变化特征及空间尺度效应:以贵州陈旗小流域为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(S1):115-122.
于洋,卫伟,陈利顶,等.黄土丘陵区坡面整地和植被耦合下的土壤水分特征[J].生态学报,2016,36(11):3441-3449.
莫保儒,蔡国军,杨磊,等.半干旱黄土区成熟柠条林地土壤水分利用及平衡特征[J].生态学报,2013,33(13):4011-4020.
赵磊磊,朱清科,聂立水,等.陕北黄土区陡坡土壤水分变异规律研究[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(2):253-259.
赵永宏,刘贤德,张学龙,等.祁连山区亚高山灌丛土壤含水量的空间分布与月份变化规律[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(4):672-681.
蔡鲁,朱婉芮,王华田,等.鲁中南山地6个造林树种根系形态的比较[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(2):84-92.
赵忠,李鹏.渭北黄土高原主要造林树种根系分布特征及抗旱性研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(1):96-100.
0
浏览量
944
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621