湖南农业大学 资源环境学院,湖南,长沙,410128
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
戴齐, 廖超林, 唐茹, 等. 湘中紫色丘陵区不同植被类型根际与非根际土壤理化特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(5):114-122.
DAI Qi, LIAO Chaolin, TANG Ru, et al. Physicochemical Characteristics of Rhizosphere and Non-rhizosphere Soils Under Different Vegetation Types in Purple Soil Hilly Region of Central Hu'nan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(5): 114-122.
戴齐, 廖超林, 唐茹, 等. 湘中紫色丘陵区不同植被类型根际与非根际土壤理化特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(5):114-122. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.05.020.
DAI Qi, LIAO Chaolin, TANG Ru, et al. Physicochemical Characteristics of Rhizosphere and Non-rhizosphere Soils Under Different Vegetation Types in Purple Soil Hilly Region of Central Hu'nan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(5): 114-122. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.05.020.
[目的] 探索湘中紫色丘陵区不同植被类型根际与非根际土壤的理化特征,为湘中地区生态修复提供理论依据。[方法] 以典型抽样方法调查湘中丘陵区草丛(G)、草灌(GS)、灌木(S)和乔灌(AS)4种典型植被,研究其根际与非根际土壤理化性质的差异,通过典型相关分析揭示根际与非根际土壤理化指标间的耦合关系。[结果] 研究区草丛和灌木根际土壤中细砂粒(0.25~0.05 mm)含量分别显著(p<0.05)低于乔灌63.84%和76.97%;粉粒(0.02~0.002 mm)含量表现为草和灌木分别显著高于乔灌的38.48%和37.66%。根际土壤0.25~0.05 mm微团聚体含量均表现为乔灌高于其他植被,0.02~0.002 mm微团聚体含量均表现为灌木高于其他植被。草灌与灌木非根际土壤有机质含量显著(p<0.05)低于根际土壤148.05%和121.92%,灌木和草灌根际土壤有机质含量显著(p<0.05)高于乔灌土壤84.28%和92.08%;草灌根际土壤全氮含量显著(p<0.05)高于非根际土壤83.33%,草灌根际土壤碱解氮含量显著(p<0.05)高于乔灌土壤200.83%;不同植被类型根际/非根际土壤磷含量差异不明显,总体来看,同一植被根际土壤全磷含量低于非根际土壤,而有效磷表现为乔灌最低;乔灌根际土壤速效钾含量分别显著(p<0.05)低于草丛和草灌土壤125.15%和137.71%,除草灌外,其余植被类型根际土壤全钾含量均低于非根际土壤。典范相关分析表明土壤有机质和全量养分含量,2~1,1~0.5,0.25~0.05 mm土粒含量,2~1,1~0.5 mm团聚体3组理化性状间相互关系密切。[结论] 改善土壤理化性质,促进湘中丘陵地区生态恢复,应注重协调土壤养分、颗粒组成及团聚体之间的耦合关系。
[Objective] To explore the physicochemical characteristics of rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils under different typical types of vegetation in purple soil hilly region of central Hunan Province
and to provide theoretical basis for ecological restoration.[Methods] The physical and chemical properties of rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils from grass(G)
grass-shrub(GS)
shrub(S) and arbor-shrub(AS) were obtained by sampling and experimental analysis to reveal the coupling relationships with regard to the indexes of physical and chemical properties of between rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils.[Results] The contents of fine sand(0.25~0.05 mm) in G and S rhizosphere soils were 76.97% and 63.84% lower that of AS (p<0.05). Whereas
the silt contents were 38.48% and 37.66% higher. The content of 0.25~0.05 mm microaggregate in the AS rhizosphere soil was higher than those of others and the 0.02~0.002 mm microaggregate content of S rhizosphere soil was the highest. The organic matter contents of GS and S in non-rhizosphere soil
were 148.05% and 121.92% (p<0.05) lower than the corresponding ones in rhizosphere soil. Organic matter contents in S and GS rhizosphere soils were 84.28% and 92.08% (p<0.05) higher that of AS. The total nitrogen content in GS rhizosphere soil was 83.33% higher than that in non-rhizosphere soil. The available nitrogen in GS rhizosphere soil was 200.83% higher (p<0.05) than that of AS. Either in rhizosphere soil or in non-rhizosphere soil
phosphorous contents had no significant differences among all types of vegetation. For the same type of vegetation
soil total phosphorous content in rhizosphere soil was lower than that in non-rhizosphere. Soil available phosphorous content in AS was the lowest. In comparison with the ones of G and GS
the available potassium content in AS rhizosphere soil was 125.15% and 137.71% lower(p<0.05). There were closed relationships among the three groups of soil physicochemical indices
referring to the group of soil organic matter and total nutrient content
the group of 2~1 mm
1~0.5 mm
0.25~0.05 mm particles and the group of 2~1 mm
1~0.5 mm aggregates.[Conclusion] The coupled relations among soil nutrient
soil particle and soil aggregates should be applied to improve soil physicochemical properties and accelerate the ecosystem restoration in hilly region of central Hunan Province.
杨宁,邹冬生,杨满元,等.衡阳紫色土丘陵坡地植被不同恢复阶段土壤理化特征分析[J].农业现代研究,2012,33(6):757-761.
Majdi H, Persson H. Effects of ammonium sulphate application on the chemistry of bulk soil, rhizosphere, fine-roots and fine-root distribution in a
Picea abies
(L.) Karst stand[J]. Plant And Soil, 1995,168-169(1):151-160.
张福锁,曹一平.根际动态过程与植物营养[J].土壤学报,1992,29(3):239-250.
廖超林,傅灵艺,盛浩,等.紫色丘陵区旱地撂荒自然恢复提高土壤蓄水性能[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(21):111-119.
Riley D, Barber S A. Bocarbonate accumulation and pH changes at the soybean root soil interface[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1969,33:905-908.
詹媛媛,薛梓瑜,任伟,等.干旱荒漠区不同灌木根际与非根际土壤氮素的含量特征[J].生态学报,2009,29(1):59-66.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M]. 3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2005.
中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤物理分析[M].北京:科学出版社,1978.
周虎,吕贻忠,杨志臣,等.保护性耕作对华北平原土壤团聚体特征的影响[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(9):1973-1979.
张超,刘国彬,薛萐,宋籽霖,张昌胜.黄土丘陵区不同植被类型根际土壤微团聚体及颗粒分形特征[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(3):507-515.
杜虎,彭晚霞,宋同清,等.桂北喀斯特峰丛洼地植物群落特征及其与土壤的耦合关系[J].植物生态学报,2013,37(3):197-208.
沈慧,姜凤崎,杜晓军,等.水土保持林土壤肥力及评价指标[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(2):60-65.
朱冰冰,李占斌,李鹏,等.黄丘区植被恢复过程中土壤团粒分形特征及抗蚀性演变[J].西安理工大学学报,2009,25(4):377-382.
周萍,刘国彬,侯喜禄.黄土丘陵区不同恢复年限草地土壤微团粒分形特征[J].草地学报,2008,16(4):396-402.
刘金福,洪伟.不同起源格氏栲林地的土壤分形特征[J].山地学报,2001,19(6):565-569.
叶存旺,翟巧绒,郭梓娟,等.沙棘-侧柏混交林土壤养分、微生物与酶活性的研究[J].西北林学院学报,2007,22(5):1-6.
侯杰,叶功富,张立华.林木根际土壤研究进展[J].防护林科技,2006(1):30-33.
吉艳芝,冯万忠,陈立新,等.落叶松混交林根际与非根际土壤养分、微生物和酶活性特征[J].生态环境2008,17(1):339-343.
苏永中,赵哈林,张铜会.几种灌木、半灌木对沙地土壤肥力影响机制的研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(7):802-806.
薛梓瑜,周志宇,詹媛媛,等.干旱荒漠区旱生灌木根际土壤磷变化特征[J].生态学报2010,30(2):0341-0349.
0
浏览量
1062
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621