土地利用类型对侵蚀黄壤腐殖质及土壤酶的影响

王战台; 曹旻霞; 蔡文昌; 黄惠群; 曾和平

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.05.005

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

土地利用类型对侵蚀黄壤腐殖质及土壤酶的影响

试验研究

- 土地利用类型对侵蚀黄壤腐殖质及土壤酶的影响
- Effects of Land Use on Humus and Soil Enzymes of Yellow Soil Under Soil Erosion
- 水土保持通报 2017年37卷第5期页码：27-33
- 作者机构：
  
  昆明理工大学环境科学与工程学院,云南,昆明,650000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“腐殖酸在水土流失固液界面的迁移行为研究：以云南楚雄龙川江流域为例”（41461061）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.05.005
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王战台, 曹旻霞, 蔡文昌, 等. 土地利用类型对侵蚀黄壤腐殖质及土壤酶的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(5):27-33.

WANG Zhantai, CAO Minxia, CAI Wenchang, et al. Effects of Land Use on Humus and Soil Enzymes of Yellow Soil Under Soil Erosion[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(5): 27-33.
王战台, 曹旻霞, 蔡文昌, 等. 土地利用类型对侵蚀黄壤腐殖质及土壤酶的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(5):27-33. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.05.005.

WANG Zhantai, CAO Minxia, CAI Wenchang, et al. Effects of Land Use on Humus and Soil Enzymes of Yellow Soil Under Soil Erosion[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(5): 27-33. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.05.005.

摘要

[目的] 研究土壤侵蚀条件下，土地利用类型对黄壤不同土层深度的腐殖质（胡敏酸、富里酸和胡敏素）和4种重要土壤酶的影响，为保持土壤肥力提供科学依据。[方法] 采用锯齿形布点法，采集土壤表层至30 cm深度的3个土层土壤样品，用3次4分法淘汰多余样品，再测定相应指标。[结果] （1）保持土壤肥力最好的是灌丛和园地，耕地最容易受侵蚀；土壤肥力高低与胡敏素的含量有直接关系。（2）土壤侵蚀导致水分和氮元素流失会影响胡敏酸的含量；林地、园地和耕地土壤表层的富里酸易流失，而草地仅对于土壤表层肥力保持有作用。（3）耕作对土壤表层的脲酶、碱性磷酸酶和过氧化氢酶活性的不利影响较大；土壤侵蚀导致的土壤pH值改变对土壤酶的影响也很明显。（4）相关性分析表明腐殖质各组分含量与4种土壤酶都有着密切的联系且互相影响。[结论] 黄壤受侵蚀下，土地利用类型对腐殖质及土壤酶有明显不同的影响。

Abstract

[Objective] The effects of land use on humus (humic acid

fulvic acid and humin) and four kinds of important soil enzymes in different yellow soil horizon under soil erosion condition were studied in order to provide some scientific basis for maintaining soil fertility.[Methods] Soil samples were collected in different soil horizon (0-10 cm

10-20 cm and 20-30 cm) at each sample point by zigzag method. Then

soil samples of each layer were mixed evenly in situ and removing of redundant sample was performed by quartering in three times and the corresponding indicators were determined.[Results] (1) Scrub woodland and garden plot had better effect in maintaining soil fertility. However

cultivated land was extremely susceptible to erosion. Soil fertility was directly related with the content of humin of yellow soil. (2) Soil erosion may also affect humic acid content through the loss of water and nitrogen. Fulvic acid of soil in forest land

garden plot and cultivated land lost more easily. However

the grassland had only impact on maintain soil surface fertility. (3) Tillage had significantly adverse effect for activity of urease

alkaline phosphatase and catalase. Meanwhile

soil erosion also evidently affects soil enzymes through the change of soil pH value. (4) Correlation analysis showed that the content of humus component had close contact with the activities of the four kinds of soil enzymes and influenced each other.[Conclusion] The land use types of yellow soil have significantly different effects on humus and soil enzyme activity under erosion.

关键词

Keywords

references

马国霞,石敏俊,李玫.中国水土流失经济损失的货币化评价[J].中国人口资源与环境,2009,19(1):162-168.

Wang Zhijie, Jiao Juying, Rayburg S, et al. Soil erosion resistance of "Grain for Green" vegetation types under extreme rainfall conditions on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Catena, 2016,141:109-116.

Yang Jisong, Yu Junbao, Liu Jingshuang, et al. Humus distribution and fraction of typical marsh soil depth profiles in the Sanjiang Plain[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2006,37(5):865-868.

关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.

王旭东,张一平,姚永斌.长期不同施肥对土壤腐殖质性质及存在形态的影响[C]//中国土壤学会青年工作委员会.迈向21世纪的土壤与植物营养科学.北京:中国农业出版社,1997.171-172.

黄继川,彭智平,于俊红,等.施用玉米秸秆堆肥对盆栽芥菜土壤酶活性和微生物的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(2):348-353.

鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.

赵护兵,刘国彬,曹清玉.黄土丘陵区不同植被类型对水土流失的影响[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(2):153-155.

李生,任华东,姚小华,等.典型石漠化地区不同植被类型地表水土流失特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(2):1-6.

李海波,韩晓增,王风,等.不同土地利用下黑土密度分组中碳、氮的分配变化[J].土壤学报,2008,45(1):112-119.

程励励,文启孝,吴顺令,等.植物物料的化学组成和腐解条件对新形成腐殖质的影响[J].土壤学报,1981,18(4):360-367.

张晓曦,刘增文,朱博超,等.半干旱黄土丘陵区纯林土壤腐殖质异化特征及与其他性质的关系[J].生态学报,2015,35(6):1779-1787.

丁咸庆,马慧静,朱晓龙,等.大围山不同海拔森林土壤有机碳垂直分布特征[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):258-262.

陈恩凤.土壤酶与土壤肥力研究[M].北京:科学出版社,1979.

杨佳佳,安韶山,张宏,等.黄土丘陵区小流域侵蚀环境对土壤微生物量及酶活性的影响[J].生态学报,2015,35(17):5666-5674.

张翠英,徐德兰,万蕾等.环境因子对湖泊沉积物碱性磷酸酶活性的影响[J].环境科学与技术,2013,36(4):23-27.

冯宏,郭彦彪,韦翔华,等.赤红壤丘陵坡地不同侵蚀部位土壤养分和微生物特征变异性研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(6):149-152.

于江,朱昌雄,郭萍,等.生物腐植酸对甘草生物量和土壤腐殖质组分含量及土壤酶活性的影响[J].草地学报,2011,19(1):68-74.

Tabatabai M A, García-Manzanedo A M, Acosta-Martinez V. Substrate specificity of arylamidase in soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2002,34(1):103-110.

安韶山,黄懿梅,刘梦云.宁南山区土壤酶活性特征及其与肥力因子的关系[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,15(5):55-58.

浏览量

1618

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

降雨与植被对大别山“林改园”区土壤侵蚀的影响

藏东南干旱河谷区土壤抗蚀性和水土流失过程模拟

2010—2023年秦岭北麓（西安段）土壤侵蚀特征

土壤改良剂在防治南方红壤区土壤侵蚀中的应用研究进展

基于无人机摄影测量的平陆运河弃土场水土流失综合防控研究