1. 安康学院 旅游与资源环境学院,陕西,安康,725000
2. 安康市汉江水资源保护与利用工程技术研究中心,陕西,安康,725000
3. 安康学院 政治与社会发展学院,陕西,安康,725000
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
安彬, 何家理, 肖薇薇. 秦巴山区自我发展能力测算及时空演变实证分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(4):303-309.
AN Bin, HE Jiali, XIAO Weiwei. A Case Analysis on Spatio-temporal Evolution Analysis of Self-development Capacity in Qinba Mountain Areas[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(4): 303-309.
安彬, 何家理, 肖薇薇. 秦巴山区自我发展能力测算及时空演变实证分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(4):303-309. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.04.051.
AN Bin, HE Jiali, XIAO Weiwei. A Case Analysis on Spatio-temporal Evolution Analysis of Self-development Capacity in Qinba Mountain Areas[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(4): 303-309. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.04.051.
[目的]了解并测算秦巴山区自我发展能力,为该区域开展减贫与经济社会发展提供科学依据。[方法]基于生态经济视角,从产业能力、市场能力、空间能力和软实力4个维度,构建秦巴山区自我发展能力测算的指标体系,应用均方差权重法对2006,2010,2014年秦巴山区自我发展能力进行测算,并分析自我发展能力及其各维度的时空演变规律。[结果](1)秦巴山区自我发展能力总体偏低,发展不平衡;(2)秦巴山区自我发展能力整体上属于市场能力制约-空间能力驱动型;(3)2006-2014年秦巴山区自我发展能力都呈增强趋势,各维度时空演变格局存在差异性;(4)秦巴山区自我发展能力的内部结构存在着不合理性。[结论]秦巴山区自我发展能力整体偏弱,区域的能力制约与驱动因素存在差异性,未来可从各子区域的产业结构、市场定位、生态功能及科技创新能力4方面制定针对性更强的发展对策。
[Objective] Investigation and calculation of the regional self-development capacity(RSC) were the keys of alleviating poverty and promoting development persistently in Qinba Mountain areas.[Methods] Based on the ecological economic perspective
taking Qinba Mountain areas as a typical example
a complicated system of RSC with four dimensions
including industry capacity(IC)
market capacity(MC)
space capacity(SC) and soft power(SP) was built up. Then
the RSCs of all the counties in 2006
2010 and 2014 were estimated and their spatio-temporal evolution were estimated by multi-index comprehensive calculation method.[Results] The RSC of Qinba areas is generally low and unbalanced. As a whole
the RSC of Qinba areas belongs to MC constraint-SC drive. From 2006 to 2014
the RSC in Qinba Mountain areas had the trend of aggrandizement
and "rising in central but declining in southeast" in spacial evolution. There are differences among the four dimensions of RSC in spatio-temporal evolution. The internal structure of RSC was unreasonable in Qinba Mountain areas.[Conclusion] The entire Qinba Mountain areas is weak in self-development ability. The regional restriction and the driving factors are also different. In the future
targeted measures for development can be made when considering the aspects of regional industrial structure
market position
ecological function and science innovation.
杨龙辉.日本生态旅游发展现状对我国的启示[J].中南林业科技大学学报:社会科学版,2016,10(4):85-88.
叶加那提·托呼涛.中国生态旅游发展的现状、问题及对策研究[J].旅游纵览月刊,2016(5):6.
李冰,吴海锁,毕军,等.旅游专项规划环境影响评价编制技术要点探讨[J].江苏环境科技,2008,21(4):46-49.
王建春,任丽军.旅游景区开发规划环境影响评价研究:以锦屏山旅游规划为例[J].山东师范大学学报:自然科学版,2008,23(1):87-90.
李巍,谢德嫦,张杰,等.景观生态学方法在规划环境影响评价中的应用:以大连森林公园东区规划环境影响评价为例[J].中国环境科学,2009,29(6):605-610.
宋睿.生态服务价值理论在规划环评中的应用研究[D].辽宁大连:大连理工大学,2007:9-11.
欧阳志云,王如松,赵景柱.生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(5):635-640.
欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(5):607-613.
谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-195.
白杨,欧阳志云郑华等.海河流域森林生态系统服务功能评估[J].生态学报,2011,31(7):2029-2039.
江波,欧阳志云苗鸿,等.海河流域湿地生态系统服务功能评估[J].生态学报,2011,31(8):2236-2244.
李艳峰,雷国平.基于生态系统服务功能价值方法的土地利用总体规划环境影响评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(5):305-310.
赵海兰.生态系统服务分类与价值评估研究进展[J].生态经济,2015,31(8):27-33.
0
浏览量
1336
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621