1. 中国科学院 西北生态环境资源研究院 阿拉善荒漠生态水文试验研究站/内陆河流域生态水文重点实验室,甘肃,兰州,730000
2. 中国科学院大学,北京,101408
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
李培都, 司建华, 冯起, 等. 基于小波分析和灰色预测的莺落峡年径流量特征分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(4):242-247.
LI Peidu, SI Jianhua, FENG Qi, et al. Analysis of Annual Runoff Characteristics of Yingluoxia Based on Wavelet Analysis and Gray Prediction[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(4): 242-247.
李培都, 司建华, 冯起, 等. 基于小波分析和灰色预测的莺落峡年径流量特征分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(4):242-247. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.04.041.
LI Peidu, SI Jianhua, FENG Qi, et al. Analysis of Annual Runoff Characteristics of Yingluoxia Based on Wavelet Analysis and Gray Prediction[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(4): 242-247. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.04.041.
[目的
]
研究黑河莺落峡年径流量的变化规律及周期特征,为水量调配和水资源管理提供理论基础与科学依据。[方法
]
基于黑河莺落峡水文站1944-2014年径流量实测资料,采用Morlet小波分析、Mann-Kendall突变和灰色预测等方法分析了莺落峡流域径流变化趋势及其变化特征。[结果
]
莺落峡年径流量呈现微弱的增加趋势,年径流量距平百分率的倾向率为2.78%/10 a。在莺落峡流域径流小波方差分析图中,有4个较为明显的峰值,它们依次对应的时间尺度为43,56,12和9 a。43 a时间尺度对应的最大峰是莺落峡流域年径流变化的第一主周期。根据年径流主周期的循环交替特征推测,在2020年左右莺落峡流域处于丰水时期,年径流量预测为1.843×10
9
m
3
。[结论
]
莺落峡年径流量周期变化特征明显,径流量呈增加趋势。
[Objective] The changing regularity and cycle characteristics of annual runoff of Yingluoxia in Heihe River was researched to provide theoretical and scientific bases for water allocation and water resources management.[Methods] Based on the measured data of runoff from Yingluoxia hydrological station in Heihe River basin during 1944 to 2014
Morlet wavelet analysis
Mann-Kendall mutation and gray prediction were used to analyze the trend of runoff and its variation characteristics.[Results] Yingluoxia annual runoff had a slight upward trend
the tendency of annual runoff anomaly percentage rate was 2.78%/10 a. Yingluoxia runoff wavelet variance figure had four obvious peaks
in turn corresponding to 43-year
56-year
12-year and 9-year time scales. Among them
the maximum peak is at 43-year time scale
and this is the first major cycle of runoff change. According to the cyclic alternation of main runoff
the Yingluo Gorge basin will be in the period of abundant water in 2020
and the annual runoff is predicted to be 1.843 billion m3.[Conclusion] The annual variation of runoff is obvious and the runoff is increasing in Yingluoxia basin.
孙建中.黄土学[M].香港:香港考古学会,2005.
王念秦,张倬元.黄土滑坡灾害研究[M].甘肃兰州:兰州大学出版社,2005.
Zhang Changliang, Zhang Yaguo, Li Tonglu, et al. In-situ observation research on the regularities of water migration in loess[J]. Water Resource and Environmental Protection, 2011,34(5):2745-2748.
徐张建,林在贯,张茂省.中国黄土与黄土滑坡[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(7):1297-1312.
范立民,岳明,冉广庆.泾河南岸崩岸型滑坡的发育规律[J].中国煤田地质,2004,16(5):37-39,46.
丁勇.人工降雨模拟作用下的黄土高边坡稳定性研究[D].陕西西安:西北大学,2011.
Tu Xingbing, Kwong A K L, Dai Fuchu, et al. Field monitoring of rainfall infiltration in a loess slope and analysis of failure mechanism of rainfall-induced landslides[J]. Engineering Geology, 2009,105(1/2):134-150.
刘海松,倪万魁,杨泓全,等.黄土路基降雨入渗现场试验[J].地球科学与环境学报,2008,30(1):60-63.
李萍,李同录,付昱凯,等.非饱和黄土中降雨入渗规律的现场监测研究[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2014,45(10):3551-3560.
武彩霞,戴福初,闵弘,等.台塬塬顶裂缝对黄土斜坡水文响应的影响[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2011,41(5):1512-1519.
许领,李宏杰,吴多贤.黄土台缘滑坡地表水入渗问题分析[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2008,19(2):32-35.
胡江洋.巨厚层黄土滑坡形成机理及综合处治方案优选研究[D].陕西西安:长安大学,2009.
李明.吴起大路沟滑坡治理方案优选研究[D].陕西西安:长安大学,2008.
白宇.吴起县大路沟特大型黄土滑坡治理设计优化研究[D].陕西西安:.西安科技大学,2014.
庄建琦,马鹏辉.一种降雨诱发滑坡灾害监测系统:中国,CN203812391U[P].2014.09.03.
吴吉春等.地下水动力学[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社.2009.
Genuchten M T V. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980,44(44):892-898.
李萍,李同录,王阿丹,等.黄土中水分迁移规律现场试验研究[J].岩土力学,2013,34(5):1331-1339.
张常亮,李萍,李同录,等.黄土中降雨入渗规律的现场监测研究[J].水利学报,2014,45(6):728-734.
欧阳斌强,唐朝生,王德银,等.土体水分蒸发研究进展[J].岩土力学,2016,37(3):625-636,654.
贾莲莲,王小江.黄土高原水面蒸发量初步估算[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(3):143-145.
Zhou Yuefeng, Tham L G, Yan R W M, et al. The mechanism of soil failures along cracks subjected to water infiltration[J]. Computers & Geotechnics, 2014, 55(2):330-341.
张茂省,李同录.黄土滑坡诱发因素及其形成机理研究[J].工程地质学报,2011,19(4):530-540.
0
浏览量
1163
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621