灰色关联投影模型在城市土地生态安全评价中的应用

李德胜; 王占岐; 侯现慧; 蓝希

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.04.033

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

灰色关联投影模型在城市土地生态安全评价中的应用

试验研究

- 灰色关联投影模型在城市土地生态安全评价中的应用
- Application of Grey Relation Projection Model to Evaluating Urban Land Ecological Security
- 水土保持通报 2017年37卷第4期页码：194-200
- 作者机构：
  
  中国地质大学(武汉) 公共管理学院,湖北,武汉,430074
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“新型城镇化背景下城市建设用地绩效评价及提升机制研究”（71673258）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.04.033
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李德胜, 王占岐, 侯现慧, 等. 灰色关联投影模型在城市土地生态安全评价中的应用[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(4):194-200.

LI Desheng, WANG Zhanqi, HOU Xianhui, et al. Application of Grey Relation Projection Model to Evaluating Urban Land Ecological Security[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(4): 194-200.
李德胜, 王占岐, 侯现慧, 等. 灰色关联投影模型在城市土地生态安全评价中的应用[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(4):194-200. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.04.033.

LI Desheng, WANG Zhanqi, HOU Xianhui, et al. Application of Grey Relation Projection Model to Evaluating Urban Land Ecological Security[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(4): 194-200. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.04.033.

摘要

[目的]构建城市土地生态安全综合评价指标体系，对2004，2009和2014年南昌市土地生态安全动态变化特征及主要障碍因子进行分析，为区域土地利用决策和生态维护提供方法基础和理论参考。[方法]利用灰色关联投影模型，引入安全水平变化动态度、安全水平标准差，开展土地生态安全动态评价及分析，运用障碍度模型诊断土地生态安全的影响因子和障碍度。[结果]（1）2004-2014年南昌市土地生态安全总水平缓慢提升，但安全水平处于低层次的低度安全等级，环境子系统从缓慢提升跌入缓慢退化阶段，经济子系统经历了由快速提升到缓慢提升阶段的变化，社会子系统始终处于缓慢提升变化状态，土地生态安全系统的内部协调性逐渐提高；（2）南昌市土地生态安全水平的障碍因子类别、障碍度及因子排序在时序上处于动态变化之中，障碍因子经历了从经济类因素向资源环境类因素的转变过程；（3）南昌市应针对土地生态系统安全暴露的问题，从土地可持续利用和健康城镇化入手，促进环境、经济、社会的和谐发展。[结论]土地生态安全评价结果符合客观实际，并针对土地生态系统暴露的主要问题提出相关对策措施。

Abstract

[Objective] An comprehensive evaluation index system of urban land ecological security was established and the dynamic change of land ecological security and the main obstacle indicators were analyzed in 2004

2009 and 2014. These were expected to provide bases for regional land use decision-making and ecological maintenance.[Methods] Dynamic evaluation and land ecological security were analyzed using grey relation projection model

dynamic degree and standard deviation. The obstacle indicators and its degree of land ecological security were measured by obstacle degree model.[Results] (1) The total degree of land ecological security during 2004-2014 increased slowly

but generally it was still in a lower level. The environmental subsystem had experienced two stages from slow promotion to gradual degradation; simultaneously

the economic one also had experienced two stages from rapid promotion to slow promotion; meanwhile

the social one always had been in a slow promotion stage. The internal coordination degree of land ecological security was improved gradually. (2) The categories

the obstacle degree

and the order of obstacle factors of land ecological security were all in dynamic change

the obstacle factors had evolved from economic factors to resources and environmental types. (3) In order to treat these problems exposed in land ecosystem security

it should be proceed with sustainable land use and healthy urbanization

hereby to achieve the coordinative development among economy

environment and the society of Nanchang City.[Conclusion] The evaluation results of land ecological security research were thought accordant with the objective reality. In view of the main problems exposed to the land ecosystem

relevant countermeasures are put forward wherein.

关键词

Keywords

references

韦新良,马俊,刘恩斌,等.生态景观林树种选择适宜性评价技术研究[J].西北林学院学报,2008,23(6):207-212.

吴志华,李天会,张华林,等.广东湛江地区绿化树种抗风性评价与分级选择[J].亚热带植物科学,2011,40(1):18-23.

孙海滨,刘佳胜.哈尔滨乡土树种综合评价[J].吉林农业,2012(2):145-182.

童丽丽,吴祝慧,王哲宇,等.层次分析法与熵技术评价在南京城市绿化生态树种选择中的应用[J].东北林业大学学报,2010,38(9):58-61.

刘常富,何兴元,陈玮,等.沈阳城市森林群落的树种组合选择[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(12):2103-2107.

王瑞辉,马履一,奚如春.论城市森林建设树种选择的原则[J].中南林学院学报,2005,25(3):58-62.

杨静怡.宜居城市绿化评价研究:以北京为例[D].北京:北京林业大学,2011.

Zahra Nazeri. Application of analytical hierarchy process in land suitability for forest park location(case study:Ilam County, Iran)[J]. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences, 2014,4(4):301-309.

Ali Sarvazad. Determining the potential of Bistoon Forest Park using hierarchical analysis method(AHP)[J]. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences, 2014,2(4):289-294.

马俊,韦新良,尤建林,等.生态景观林树种选择定量研究[J].浙江林学院学报,2008,25(5):578-583.

白如雪,杨立新,昝世明,等.基于层次分析法的矿区生态修复树种选择研究:以辽宁省葫芦岛市杨家杖子钼矿区为例[J].中国园艺文摘,2012,28(1):50-51.

李向军.山西太行山区造林树种决策模型研究[J].科技情报开发与经济,2004,14(4):166-167.

袁菲,张星耀,梁军.基于干扰的汪清林区森林生态系统健康评价[J],生态学报,2013,33(12):3722-3731.

郑德祥,陈平留.层次分析法在防火树种选择中的应用[J].北华大学学报:自然科学版,2000,1(5):443-446.

徐红梅,潘磊,史玉虎,等.三峡库区水土保持树种选择研究[J].湖北林业科技,2011(6):5-10.

Cay T, Uyan M. Evaluation of reallocation criteria in land consolidation studies using the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)[J]. Land Use Policy, 2013,30(1):541-548.

Godratollah Barzekar. Using analytical hierarchy process(AHP)for prioritizing and ranking of ecological indicators for monitoring sustainability of ecotourism in Northern Forest, Iran[J]. Ecologia Balkanica, 2011,3(1):59-67.

Elizabeth D C. An Exploration of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and its Potential for Use in Forest Engineering[C]. Forest Operations Among Competing Forest Uses. Council on Forest Engineering(COFE) Conference Proceedings, 2003.

李兰花,孙树光,朱金兆,等.北京市低山区水土保持林评价与分级[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(4):134-137.

陈何盾.半干旱风沙区立地类型划分与抗逆树种选择[J].山西林业科技,2009,38(3):29-32.

季元祖.半干旱黄土丘陵沟壑区适生树种选择[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2006.

张海,牛秀峰,孙平阳,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区多树种立地适生性评价试验研究[J].林业科学,2005,41(5):66-71.

王华田,张光灿,刘霞.论黄土丘陵区造林树种选择的原则[J].世界林业研究,2001,14(5):74-78.

李新平.太行山中段造林树种选择研究[J].山西林业科技,2012,41(1):1-5,26.

中国林业科学研究院林业研究所.太行山适地适树与评价研究报告集[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1999.

许树柏.层次分析法原理[M].天津:天津大学出版社,1988.

雷远鸣.对AHP层次总排序方法的扩展[J].系统工程理论与实践,1992,12(6):63-65.

浏览量

1459

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

聊城市土地生态安全评价

福建省土地生态安全动态评价

基于物元模型的苏南地区土地生态安全评价

河北省海洋可持续发展动态评价

基于生态足迹的港口型城镇土地生态安全研究——以宁波市镇海区为例