1. 长安大学 环境科学与工程学院,陕西,西安,710054
2. 旱区地下水文与生态效应 教育部重点实验室,陕西,西安,710054
3. 中国建材地勘中心甘肃总队,甘肃,天水,741000
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
高策, 严婷, 葛佳亮, 等. 基于Visual Modflow的某油库地下水污染模拟[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(4):179-183.
GAO Ce, YAN Ting, GE Jialiang, et al. Numerical Simulation of Groundwater Pollution of an Oil Depot Based on Visual Modflow[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(4): 179-183.
高策, 严婷, 葛佳亮, 等. 基于Visual Modflow的某油库地下水污染模拟[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(4):179-183. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.04.030.
GAO Ce, YAN Ting, GE Jialiang, et al. Numerical Simulation of Groundwater Pollution of an Oil Depot Based on Visual Modflow[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(4): 179-183. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.04.030.
[目的]对陕西省黄陵县某油库地下水污染状况进行模拟,为油库区地下水污染的辅助预测和防治提供科学指导。[方法]通过野外调查试验获得初始参数,应用Visual Modflow软件建立了地下水水流模型,进行模型识别验证,获得最终水文地质参数。耦合水流方程与污染物迁移方程,得到地下水溶质运移模型。[结果]模拟了两种假设情形下运移情况:正常工况和油罐漏油。数值模拟预测了污染的范围和程度。到预测时间20 a,污染物影响范围最大。[结论]污染物主要沿水流方向运移,对水环境的影响随时间逐渐增大,污染浓度随距离增大而减小;两种情况下,油罐漏油时对水环境造成的影响更加恶劣,污染范围远超出油库区。
[Objective] The groundwater pollution status of a depot in Huangling County of Shaanxi Province were simulated to provide scientific guidance for auxiliary prediction and prevention of groundwater pollution in oil depot area.[Methods] Based on the initial parameters obtained through field investigation
we established a groundwater flow model using Visual Modflow software. Then through model identification and verification
we obtained the final hydrogeological parameters. And we derived a groundwater solute transport model in reference to water flow equation and contaminant transport equation.[Results] We simulated two hypothetical scenarios:one is under normal working condition and another one is when oil leakage happened for the oil tank. The range and degree of pollution were predicted by numerical simulation. The impact of pollutants was predicted that it would become the greatest in the following 20th year of leakage.[Conclusion] The results obviously showed that the contaminant transport mainly via flow direction
the impact on water environment tends to gradually increase with time going on. And there was a negative correlation between the concentration of pollution and the distance from oil tank. Oil tank leakage will cause more severe pollution to the water environment than normal operation can do
under that case
pollution is far beyond the scope of the depot area.
沈毅,晏晓林,梁爱学,等.厚层基材喷播边坡防护技术研究[J].公路交通科技,2007,24(2):151-154.
许文年,叶建军,周明涛,等.植被混凝土护坡绿化技术若干问题探讨[J].水利水电技术,2004,35(10):50-52.
张俊云,周德培.植被护坡工程技术[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2003.
刘甲荣,舒安平,郭建民.半干旱区高速公路生态护坡技术[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2011.
杨俊杰,王亮,郑建国,等.生态边坡客土稳定性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(02):414-422.
肖蓉,高照良,宋晓强,等.高速公路边坡植被特征分析及护坡模式优化研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(2):90-94.
程洪,张新全.草本植物根系网固土原理的力学试验探究[J].水土保持通报,2002,22(5):20-23.
邓卫东,周群华,严秋荣.植物根系固坡作用的试验与计算[J].中国公路学报,2007,20(5):7-12.
嵇晓雷,杨平.应用分形维数研究狗牙根根系边坡固坡效应[J].林业科技开发,2016,1(4):129-133.
卜宗举.植被根系浅层加筋作用对边坡稳定性的影响[J].北京交通大学学报,2016,40(3):55-60.
郑力文,刘小光,余新晓,等.油松根系直径对根-土界面摩擦性能的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2014,36(3):90-94.
嵇晓雷,杨平.基于根系形态的根系固坡作用数值分析[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2013,37(2):113-117.
万娟,肖衡林,何俊.多花木兰根系抗拉特性及边坡稳定性分析[J].华中科技大学学报:自然科学版,2014,42(8):109-113.
杨永红,王成华,刘淑珍,等.不同植被类型根系提高浅层滑坡土体抗剪强度的试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(2):233-235.
冯国建,朱维伟.草本植物根系对边坡浅层稳定性影响研究[J].草原与草坪,2015,35(4):23-26.
陈怿旸,孙树林,王恩喜,等.草及灌木根系对不同土质边坡稳定性影响分析[J].河北工程大学学报:自然科学版,2016,33(3):48-51.
肖宏彬,贺茜,李珍玉,等.根系对边坡土体抗崩解能力影响的试验研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2015,35(5):35-38.
0
浏览量
1234
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621