太原小店污灌区农田土壤多环芳烃的污染特征及其来源

赵颖; 张丽

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.04.017

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

太原小店污灌区农田土壤多环芳烃的污染特征及其来源

试验研究

- 太原小店污灌区农田土壤多环芳烃的污染特征及其来源
- Pollution Characteristics and Sources of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Farmland Soil of a Sewage Irrigation Area
- 水土保持通报 2017年37卷第4期页码：99-105
- 作者机构：
  
  山西省环境科学研究院,山西,太原,030027
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“白洋淀湿地水-土-植被体系碳排放及其调控机理研”（41601202），“生态补水影响下白洋淀湿地水生态系统对水文-气象-环境要素的响应关系研究”（41401020）;山西省青年科技研究资助项目（2015021173）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.04.017
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
赵颖, 张丽. 太原小店污灌区农田土壤多环芳烃的污染特征及其来源[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(4):99-105.

ZHAO Ying, ZHANG Li. Pollution Characteristics and Sources of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Farmland Soil of a Sewage Irrigation Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(4): 99-105.
赵颖, 张丽. 太原小店污灌区农田土壤多环芳烃的污染特征及其来源[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(4):99-105. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.04.017.

ZHAO Ying, ZHANG Li. Pollution Characteristics and Sources of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Farmland Soil of a Sewage Irrigation Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(4): 99-105. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.04.017.

摘要

[目的]对太原小店污灌区农田土壤多环芳烃（PAHs）的污染特征及来源进行分析，为该区农田土壤环境质量评价及土壤污染防治对策的制定提供科学依据。[方法]采集太原小店污灌区15个表层土壤样品，利用GC/MS分析16种US EPA优控多环芳烃（PAHs）的含量，并对其来源和生态风险进行探讨。[结果]所有样品的16种PAHs均被检出，其检出率为100%。研究区农田土壤中总PAHs的浓度为0.315~7.661 μg/g，平均值为3.568 μg/g。在组成上，2，3环含量约占总量的64.2%，4环含量约占总量的14.2%，5，6环含量约占总量的21.6%，低环和中环PAHs含量所占的比例较高。根据特征比值法及调查结果判定，农田土壤中PAHs污染来源一方面与灌溉水质及灌溉历史有很大的关系，另一方面，主要通过燃煤或化石燃料产生的PAHs在大气干湿沉降和风力输送作用下进入到土壤环境中。[结论]与国内外其他地区的相关研究比较，小店污灌区农田土壤PAHs含量处于中高等污染水平。依据Maliszewska-Kordybach建议的分级标准评价，该区域所有采样点PAHs总量均超标；但基于我国《土壤环境质量标准（征求意见稿）（GB15618-2008）》提出的16种多PAHs污染物总量的农业用地标准值，该区域均未超出此标准。

Abstract

[Objective] This study analyzed the pollution characteristics and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs) in farmland soil from Xiaodian sewage irrigation area in Taiyuan City. The results should facilitate the development of farmland environment evaluation and soil pollution prevention strategy in the study area.[Methods] 15 surface soil samples were collected

and their concentrations and composition of 16 PAHs listed for prior control by US EPA were detected with a gas chromatography equipped with mass spectrometry (GC/MS). The sources and ecological risks of the soils were assessed.[Results] The results showed that 16 PAHs were generally detected

with the detection ratio of 100%. The total PAHs concentrations varied from 0.315 to 7.661 μg/g

with an average value of 3.568 μg/g. In terms of composition

the contents of PAHs of 2

3 rings accounted for 64.2% of the total PAHs

the contents of PAHs of 4 rings accounted for 14.2%

and the percentage of 5

6 ring-PAHs was 21.6%. Thus

the contents of PAHs with low and middle rings were much higher. Based on ratio method and in-site investigation

it was induced that the PAHs sources were not only related with water quality and history of sewage irrigation

but also with the sources from the combustions of wood

coal and fossil fuels.[Conclusion] Compared with the relative research of farmland soils at home and abroad

PAHs pollution in this area was in medium or higher level. According to the standards recommended by Maliszewska-Kordybach

the total concentrations of PAHs exceeded the limited value in all the sampling points. However

these values were below the "National Environmental quality standards for soils(GB15618-2008)" proposed by China.

关键词

Keywords

references

Basanta P, Zhang Yili, Li Shicheng, et al. Review of studies on land use and land cover change in Nepal[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2016,13(4):643-660.

Wu Kaiya, Ye Xinyue, Qi Zhifang, et al. Impacts of landuse/land cover change and socio-economic developmenton regional ecosystem services:The case of fast-growing Hang zhou metropolitan area[J]. Cities, 2013,31(2):276-284.

Radoslava K, Miriam K, Jozef N, et al. Land-use and land-cover changes in rural areas during different political systems:A case study of Slovakia from 1782 to 2006[J]. Land Use Policy, 2014,36(1):554-566.

Mooney H A. Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013,110(9):3665-3672.

李名勇,晏路明,王丽丽,等.基于高程约束的区域LUCC及其生态效应研究:以福州市为例[J].地理科学,2013,33(1):75-82.

刘纪远,匡文慧,张增祥,等.20世纪80年代末以来中国土地利用变化的基本特征与空间格局[J].地理学报,2014,69(1):3-14.

孙丕苓,许月卿,王数.环京津贫困带土地利用变化的地形梯度效应分析[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(14):277-288.

张静,任志远.秦巴山区土地利用时空格局及地形梯度效应[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(14):250-257.

李京京,吕哲敏,石小平,等.基于地形梯度的汾河流域土地利用时空变化分析[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(7):230-236.

吴见,王帅帅,谭靖.基于安徽省土地利用变化的地形梯度效应分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016,25(2):239-248.

龚文峰,袁力,范文义.基于地形梯度的哈尔滨市土地利用格局变化分析[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(2):250-259.

许宁,张广录,刘紫玉.基于地形梯度的河北省太行山区土地利用时空变异研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(10):1284-1292.

薄广涛,牛志君,郭义强,等.冀西北间山盆地区土地利用变化地形梯度效应[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(1):1-6.

陈学兄,张小军,常庆瑞.陕西省地形起伏度最佳计算单元研究[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(3):265-270.

喻红,曾辉,江子瀛.快速城市化地区景观组分在地形梯度上的分布特征研究[J].地理科学,2001,21(1):64-69.

陈楠,杨武年,李娟.巴中市丘陵山区土地利用在地形梯度上的分布特征[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(1):185-188.

庄逐舟,黄秋昊,石云.黄土丘陵区土地利用变化与地形梯度关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(4):331-337.

郭洪峰,许月卿,吴艳芳.基于地形梯度的土地利用格局与时空变化分析:以北京市平谷区为例[J].经济地理,2013,33(1):160-166,186.

王秀兰,包玉海.土地利用动态变化研究方法探讨[J].地理科学进展,1999,18(1):81-87.

高彦净,巩杰,贾珍珍,等.甘肃白龙江流域土地利用在地形梯度上的空间分布[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版,2014,60(5):680-686.

浏览量

1194

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

滨海小流域表层沉积物多环芳烃污染特征及风险评估

腐殖酸与活性污泥对污染土壤联合修复研究

兰州地区农田土壤速效磷与速效钾含量的变化特征

不同施肥措施对德州市农田土壤生物学性状的影响

太湖流域农村黑臭河流表层沉积物营养盐的污染特征