1. 长安大学 环境科学与工程学院,陕西,西安,710054
2. 陕西地矿九〇八水文地质工程地质大队,陕西,西安,710600
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
孙启明, 柯贤敏, 田国林, 等. 基于渗流井理论的放水试验数值模拟及水文地质参数不确定性分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(3):290-294.
SUN Qiming, KE Xianmin, TIAN Guolin, et al. Numerical Simulation and Analysis of Hydrogeological Parameter Uncertainty Based on Seepage Well Theory[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 290-294.
孙启明, 柯贤敏, 田国林, 等. 基于渗流井理论的放水试验数值模拟及水文地质参数不确定性分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(3):290-294. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.050.
SUN Qiming, KE Xianmin, TIAN Guolin, et al. Numerical Simulation and Analysis of Hydrogeological Parameter Uncertainty Based on Seepage Well Theory[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 290-294. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.050.
[目的] 建立可靠的地下水数值模型,为煤矿矿坑涌水的预测提供参考。[方法] 采用Modflow-2005中的Conduit Flow Process(CFP)方法对某煤矿放水试验进行模拟,并用局部灵敏度分析方法进行水文地质参数不确定性分析。[结果] 建立了"渗流-管流耦合模型",经过反复调参,分析拟合结果,求得最佳拟合的水文地质参数。通过灵敏度分析,获得最大的灵敏度参数。[结论] 研究区内含水层渗透性差异比较大,在疏放水过程中要做好预防措施;灵敏度分析结果表明,井管C值对放水试验影响最大,纵向上侏罗系下统延安组渗透系数的影响大于其他含水岩组。
[Objective] To establish a reliable groundwater numerical model
and to provide reference for the prediction of coal mine pit water inflow.[Methods] The flow process conduit(CFP) of Modflow-2005 was used to simulate the dewatering test of a coal mine
and the uncertainty analysis of hydrogeological parameters was carried out using local sensitivity analysis method.[Results] A coupling model of seepage and pipe flow was established. After repeated adjustment and analysis of fitting results
the best fitting of the hydrogeological parameters was obtained. Through sensitivity analysis
the maximum sensitivity parameter was obtained.[Conclusion] There are big differences in the permeability of the aquifers in the study area
precautions should be taken in the process of drainage. The sensitivity analysis results showed that the conductance of the pipe has the greatest influence. Vertically
of Lower Jurassic Yan'an group(J2Y)the permeability was higher than that of other aquifer groups.
房佩贤.专门水文地质学[M].北京:地质出版社,1987.
薛禹群,吴吉春.地下水数值模拟在我国:回顾与展望[J].水文地质工程地质,1997(4):21-24.
Kuniansky E L, Halford K J, Shoemaker W B. Permeameter data verify new turbulence process for MODFLOW[J]. Ground water, 2008,46(5):768-771.
Shoemaker W B, Birk S, Bauer S, et al. Documentation of a conduit flow process(CFP)for MODFLOW-2005[M]//Techniques & Methods, 2008.
Reimann T, Hill M E. MODFLOW-CFP:A new conduit flow process for MODFLOW-2005[J]. Ground Water, 2009,47(3):321-325.
张蓉蓉,束龙仓,闵星,等.管道流对非均质岩溶含水系统水动力过程影响的模拟[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2012(S2):386-392.
水兵.《地下水不稳定混合抽水的渗流-管流耦合模型及其应用》研究成果简介[J].水文地质工程地质,1994,21(1):49-49.
陈崇希,林敏,叶善士,等.地下水混合井流的理论及应用[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1998.
Chen Chongxi, Jiao Jiujimmy. Numerical simulation of pumping tests in multilayer wells with non-darcian flow in the well bore[J]. Ground Water, 1999,37(3):465-474.
陈崇希,胡立堂.渗流-管流耦合模型及其应用综述[J].水文地质工程地质,2008,35(3):70-75.
王玮.渗流井取水计算模型及其应用[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,2010.
杜京浓,宋汉周,霍吉祥,等.大坝基础渗流数值模拟参数灵敏度探讨[J].低温建筑技术,2014,36(11):90-92.
吴雯倩,靳孟贵.淮北市地下水流数值模拟及水文地质参数不确定性分析[J].水文地质工程地质,2014,41(3):21-28.
0
浏览量
1144
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621