龙门山地区水土流失敏感性评价及其空间分异

陈盼盼; 胡利利; 李亦秋; 邓欧

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.040

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

龙门山地区水土流失敏感性评价及其空间分异

实验研究

- 龙门山地区水土流失敏感性评价及其空间分异
- Sensitivity Assessment and Spatial Distribution of Soil Erosion in Longmen Mountains Region
- 水土保持通报 2017年37卷第3期页码：237-241
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 绵阳师范学院生态安全与保护四川省重点实验室,四川,绵阳,621000
  2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京,100100
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“库坝工程开发的生态极化效应发生机理及其敏感性评”（41371486）;生态安全与保护四川省重点实验室项目（ESP201304，QD2014A001）;四川省教育厅资助项目（14ZA0258）;绵阳师范学院工程硕士研究生创新实践基金资助（XYCXXM201510）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.040
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈盼盼, 胡利利, 李亦秋, 等. 龙门山地区水土流失敏感性评价及其空间分异[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(3):237-241.

CHEN Panpan, HU Lili, LI Yiqiu, et al. Sensitivity Assessment and Spatial Distribution of Soil Erosion in Longmen Mountains Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 237-241.
陈盼盼, 胡利利, 李亦秋, 等. 龙门山地区水土流失敏感性评价及其空间分异[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(3):237-241. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.040.

CHEN Panpan, HU Lili, LI Yiqiu, et al. Sensitivity Assessment and Spatial Distribution of Soil Erosion in Longmen Mountains Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 237-241. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.040.

摘要

[目的] 确定水土流失优先保护区和需要生态修复的区域，为龙门山的生态环境治理和社会经济发展提供重要的决策依据。[方法] 主要考虑降水、土壤侵蚀和地形起伏和植被覆盖等通用土壤流失方程中的水土流失影响因子，对龙门山地区水土流失敏感性进行辨识，并借助于3S技术强大的空间数据采集和分析功能，计算水土流失敏感性综合得分值，按照ArcGIS自然断点分类方法将水土流失敏感性分为不敏感区、较敏感区、低度敏感区、中度敏感区和极敏感区5个等级。[结果] 龙门山东部山前丘陵地区，人类活动频繁，水土流失敏感性最强，占总面积的34.12%；中部中海拔山地区域，水土流失敏感性次之，占总面积的28.30%；西部山区，水土流失敏感性最低，所占面积比重较小，为13.65%。[结论] 龙门山地区水土流失敏感性具有明显的地域分异特点，人类活动频繁，对自然生态系统的干扰强烈，水土流失敏感性最强，人类活动是加剧龙门山地区水土流失敏感性的主要因素。

Abstract

[Objective] The regional priority with regard to soil and water loss and ecological restoration was explored to provide some major decision-making bases for ecological environment management and social and economic development in Longmen Mountains area.[Methods] Based on the powerful spatial analysis function of GIS

the spatial values of soil erosive sensitivity in Longmen Mountains area were identified and calculated in consideration of all comprehensive influence factors of soil and water loss

as precipitation

soil erosion

topography relief and vegetation cover

etc. According to the classification method of natural breakpoint of ArcGIS

areas in term of sensitivity degree of soil erosion were designated as following:insensitive area

sensitive area

low sensitive area

moderate sensitive area and extreme sensitive area.[Results] The highest sensitivity areas were mainly distributed in the eastern piedmont hills and alluvial plains

accounting for 34.12% of the total area. Moderate sensitivity areas were mainly distributed in the central hilly areas

accounting for 28.30% of the total area. Low sensitivity zone were mainly distributed in the western mountains

accounting for 13.65% of the total area. The covered areas by different sensitivity degree were largely overlapped spatial distribution of human activity frequency.[Conclusion] The sensitivity of soil and water loss in the study area had obvious regional differentiation with regard to the erosive sensitivity. It is the frequent human activity that cause strong disturbance to natural ecosystem and cause subsequent strong sensitivity to soil erosion.

关键词

Keywords

references

赵乾坤.山西省水土保持功能分区及生态脆弱性评价[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学,2014:5-7.

欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究[J].生态学报,2000,20(1):9-12.

刘康,康艳,曹明明,等.基于GIS的陕西省水土流失敏感性评价[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(5):168-170.

Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses:A guide to conservation planning[Z]. United States Department of Agriculture:Agricultural Handbook, 1978:537.

Laflen J M, Lane L J, Foster G R. WEPP:A new generation of erosion prediction technology[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1991,46(1):34-38.

Morgan R P C, Quinton J N, Smith R E, et al. The European soil erosion model (EUROSEM):A dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1998(23):527-544.

蔡强国,刘纪根,刘前进.岔巴沟流域次暴雨产沙统计模型[J].地理研究,2004,23(4):433-439.

蔡强国,袁再健,程琴娟,等.分布式侵蚀产沙模型研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2006,25(3):48-54.

崔普伟.基于单元流域的黄土丘陵沟壑区岔巴沟流域次暴雨产沙经验模型研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2010:20-26.

Baffalt C, Nearing M A, Nicks A D. Impact of GLIGEN parameters on WEPP predicted average soil loss[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1996,39(2):1001-1020.

朱强,黄丽玲,俞孔坚.景观规划的环境学途径[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2006.

Turner B L, Kasperson R E, Matson P A, et al. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003,100(14):8074-8079.

Forbes V E, Calow P. Applying weight-of-evidence in retrospective ecological risk assessment when quantitative data are limited[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2002,8(7):1625-1639.

凡非得,王克林,熊鹰,等.西南喀斯特区域水土流失敏感性评价及其空间分异特征[J].生态学报,2011,31(21):6353-6362.

徐广才,康慕谊,赵从举,等.阜康市生态敏感性评价研究[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2007,43(1):88-92.

陈立春,冉勇康,王虎,等.芦山地震与龙门山断裂带南段活动性[J].科学通报,2013,58(20):1925-1932.

李艳菊.龙门山中北段区域地学景观及传统聚落适宜性研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2013:29-33.

李嘉.四川稻城地区地质景观研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2011:25-28.

谢云,林燕,张岩.通用土壤流失方程的发展与应用[J].地理科学进展,2003,22(3):279-287.

王万忠,焦菊英.中国的土壤侵蚀因子定量评价研究[J].水土保持通报,1996,16(5):1-20.

卜兆宏,卜宇行,陈炳贵,等. 用定量遥感方法监测UNDP试区小流域水土流失研究[J].水科学进展,1999,10(1):31-36.

卜兆宏,杨林丈,卜宇行,等.太湖流域苏皖汇流区土壤可蚀性

值及其应用研究[J].土壤学报,2002,39(3):296-300.

浏览量

1123

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同雨强和坡度下新安江流域典型土壤坡面的产流产沙特征

基于CSLE模型的2024年福建省典型区域水土流失特征及其差异评估

2019—2024年珠江流域人为扰动地类分布及其水土流失特征

大暴雨条件下宁夏生产道路侵蚀特征及影响因素

青海省2004—2023年水土流失变化及其驱动力