华中农业大学 公共管理学院,湖北,武汉,430070
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
丁翔宇, 赵芸逸, 王秀兰, 等. 政府主导型城乡建设用地的增减挂钩效益研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(3):140-145.
Increase-Decrease Linked Benefit of Urban and Rural Construction Land Dominated by Government[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 140-145.
丁翔宇, 赵芸逸, 王秀兰, 等. 政府主导型城乡建设用地的增减挂钩效益研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(3):140-145. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.024.
Increase-Decrease Linked Benefit of Urban and Rural Construction Land Dominated by Government[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 140-145. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.024.
[目的] 分析政府主导模式下的城乡建设用地增加挂钩项目效益的特征,为完善增减挂钩制度提供依据。[方法] 以湖北省内的3个政府主导型增减挂钩项目作为研究对象,从经济、社会、生态效益3方面选取15个指标构建城乡建设用地增减挂钩项目效益评价指标体系,运用层次分析法和模糊综合评价法,测度增减挂钩项目在实施前后的经济、社会、生态效益以及综合效益的隶属度。[结果] 在政府主导模式下,3个增减挂钩项目的综合效益隶属度的增长率分别为21.56%,19.13%,21.94%,增长幅度一般,但较为稳定,其中社会效益增长最大,其次是经济效益,而生态效益小幅度下降。[结论] 完善相关政策制度,加强政府对关键环节的监控,同时引入市场机制,可以弥补政府主导模式中的资金缺乏和效率低下等问题。
[Objective] To analyze the characteristics of benefit from projects of "Linking the Increase in Land Used for Urban Construction with the Decrease in Land Used for Rural Construction" in the government-led mode
in order to provide a basis for project consummation.[Methods] Based on the research data of 3 projects in Hubei Province
from 3 aspects of the economic
social and ecological benefits
this paper selected 15 indicators to build the evaluation system. Analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehension evaluation model were used to measure the economic
social
ecological benefits and the membership of comprehensive benefits before and after the project implementation.[Results] In the government-led model
the memberships of comprehensive benefits of 3 projects were 21.56%
19.13%
and 21.94%
which illustrated the growth rate was at normal but stable level. The growth of social benefit was biggest
the economic benefit followed
while the ecological benefit declined slightly.[Conclusion] Relevant policies should be perfected
the government's management on the macroscopic supervision and the control of the key links in project should be strengthened
and the market mechanism should be introduced to make up for the funds gap and resolve the inefficiency under the government pattern.
张桂芳,杨玉珍.宅基地闲置程度及退出影响因素分析[J].中国土地,2016,3(7):23-25.
周小平,黄蕾,谷晓坤,等.城乡建设用地增减挂钩规划方法及实证[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(10):79-85.
李旺君,王雷.城乡建设用地增减挂钩的利弊分析[J].国土资源情报,2009(4):34-37.
朱琳.城乡建设用地增减挂钩政策研究[D].成都:西南大学,2010.
易小燕,陈印军,肖碧林,等.城乡建设用地增减挂钩运行中出现的主要问题与建议[J].中国农业资源与区划,2011,32(1):11-13.
王君,朱玉碧,郑财贵.对城乡建设用地增减挂钩运作模式的探讨[J].农村经济,2007,8(3):29-31.
叶剑平.一样的土地,不一样的生活[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010:24-26.
邱铃章.天津市、成都市城乡建设用地增减挂钩模式的启示[J].发展研究,2010,10(4):32-35.
顾汉龙,冯淑怡,曲福田.重庆市两类城乡建设用地增减挂钩模式的比较[J].中国土地科学,2014,9(28):11-16.
徐庆朗,张凤伟,李楠,等.影响城乡建设用地增减挂钩实施效果的因素分析[J].国土资源情报,2011,9:50-52.
周婧,杨庆媛.农户层面农村宅基地流转研究进展与述评[J].地理科学进展,2012,2(31):139-148.
Chaney P, Sherwood K. The resale of right to buy dwellings:A case study of migration and social change in rural England[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2000,16(1):79-94.
黄春芳.城乡建设用地增减挂钩项目后效益评价研究[D].成都:西南大学,2011.
邵裔娉.城乡建设用地增减挂钩项目后绩效评价研究[D].辽宁抚顺:东华理工大学,2013.
0
浏览量
1100
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621