甘肃政法学院,甘肃,兰州,730000
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
杨彬如. 自然保护区居民生计资本与生计策略[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(3):113-118.
YANG Binru. Livelihood Capital and Livelihood Strategies of Residents in Nature Reserve[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 113-118.
杨彬如. 自然保护区居民生计资本与生计策略[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(3):113-118. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.020.
YANG Binru. Livelihood Capital and Livelihood Strategies of Residents in Nature Reserve[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 113-118. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.020.
[目的] 研究自然保护区居民的生计资本核算和生计策略,帮助保护区居民根据生计资本特点选择生计策略。[方法] 选取地理区位和自然环境特点各具代表性的3个自然保护区农村并分析其社会经济数据,使用可持续生计资本框架的扩展核算这3个村庄的生计资本。[结果] 通过核算这3个村庄生计资本的总量和结构,发现自然资本相对优良的中沙村的生计资本总量反而最小,而自然资本相对薄弱的西靖村和李子坝的生计资本总量反而较高。李子坝村的物质资本和金融资本在其生计资本中所占比例均较高,说明物质资本和金融资本对自然保护区居民生计资本总量的作用强度较高。[结论] 自然资本对自然保护区居民生计资本总量的作用强度较低,信息资本在保护区居民生计资本总量增长和积累中的作用越来越明显。
[Objective] The livelihood capital and livelihood strategies of residents in nature reserve were researched to help the residents in nature reserve to choose livelihood strategy according to characteristic of its livelihood capital.[Methods] Three representative villages with regard to their geographic location and natural environment in rural areas were selected and the socioeconomic data were collected. The expanded sustainable livelihood framework was used for accounting livelihood capital of these 3 villages.[Results] According to the amount and structure of livelihood capital
we found that
in Zhongsha Village
though the natural capital was relatively good
the livelihood capital was the minimum. On the contrary
the livelihood capital was higher in Xijing and Liziba Village where the natural capitals were relatively weak. The proportions of material capital and financial capital in Liziba Village were comparatively higher
indicating that the two items have more important role for total livelihood capital.[Conclusion] The natural capital was unimportant for local residents' livelihood capital. At the same time
the role of information capital acting on the growth and accumulation of total amount of livelihood capital of residents in nature reserves is becoming more and more obvious.
任慧,郝孟曦,张萌,等.我国国家级自然保护区数量特征研究[J].生态科学,2012,31(3):225-232.
杨亮亮,崔国发.我国自然保护区数量特征分析[J].林业实用技术,2009(3):54-56.
UK Department for International Development. Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets[R]. London:DFID, 1999:21-53.
Maretzki A N. Women's NutriBusiness cooperatives in Kenya:An integrated strategy for sustaining rural livelihoods[J]. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 2007,39(6):327-334.
刘婧,郭圣乾.可持续生计资本对农户收入的影响:基于信息熵法的实证[J].统计与决策,2012(9):103-105.
Odero K K. Extending the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework[D]. Zimbabwe:University of Zimbabwe, 2010:18-29.
许汉石,乐章.生计资本、生计风险与农户的生计策略[J].农业经济问题,2012(10):100-105.
蔡志海.汶川地震灾区贫困村农户生计资本分析[J].中国农村经济,2010(12):55-67.
时红艳.外出务工与非外出务工农户生计资本状况实证研究[J].统计与决策,2011(4):79-81.
段伟,任艳梅,冯冀,等.基于生计资本的农户自然资源依赖研究:以湖北省保护区为例[J].农业经济问题,2015(8):74-82.
乔辉,何军,胡凌啸.劳动力流动、社区资源与农户的现代农业参与[J].农业经济,2015(10):89-94.
道日娜.农牧交错区域农户生计资本与生计策略关系研究:以内蒙古东部四个旗为例[J].中国人口资源与环境,2014(S2):274-278.
王彦星,潘石玉,卢涛,等.生计资本对青藏高原东缘牧民生计活动的影响及区域差异[J].资源科学,2014(10):157-164.
王沛沛,许佳君.生计资本对水库移民创业的影响分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(2):150-156.
贺爱琳,杨新军,陈佳,等.乡村旅游发展对农户生计的影响:以秦岭北麓乡村旅游地为例[J].经济地理,2014(12):174-181.
冯磊.基于二分式CVM的三江平原湿地景观价值评价[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2012:9-21.
IPCC.2006 IPCC guidelines for national green house gas inventories:VolumeⅡ[R]. Japan:the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies,2008[2008-07-20].
罗正月.劳动收入的最优化:农民工工资增长的新思路[J].西北农林科技大学学报:社会科学版,2013(1):6-11.
官爱兰,蔡燕琦.农村人力资本开发对农业经济发展的影响:基于中部省份的实证分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2015(1):31-37.
杨培涛.牧民生计资本与生计策略的关系研究:以甘南藏族自治州为例[D].兰州:西北师范大学,2009:18-27.
苏芳,蒲欣冬,徐中民,等.生计资本与生计策略关系研究:以张掖市甘州区为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2009,19(6):119-125.
韦惠兰,冯茹,范文安.生态补偿与林缘社区的可持续生计:以甘肃白水江国家级自然保护区为例[J].农村经济,2008(4):62-65.
唐莹,穆怀中.我国耕地资源价值核算研究综述[J].中国农业资源与区划,2014(5):73-79.
0
浏览量
1061
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621