1. 甘肃中医药大学,甘肃,兰州,730020
2. 兰州大学 草地农业科技学院,甘肃,兰州,730020
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
谢晓蓉, 刘金荣, 王引权, 等. 功能性盐土改良肥对河西走廊草甸盐土的改土效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(3):67-74.
XIE Xiaorong, LIU Jinrong, WANG Yinquan, et al. Effect of Functional Solonchak Improvement Fertilizer on Saline Soil Improvement in Meadow of Hexi Corridor[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 67-74.
谢晓蓉, 刘金荣, 王引权, 等. 功能性盐土改良肥对河西走廊草甸盐土的改土效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(3):67-74. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.012.
XIE Xiaorong, LIU Jinrong, WANG Yinquan, et al. Effect of Functional Solonchak Improvement Fertilizer on Saline Soil Improvement in Meadow of Hexi Corridor[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 67-74. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.012.
[目的
]
解决河西走廊盐土存在的"旱、涝、盐、瘦"等疑难问题,为改良河西走廊盐土提供理论依据。[方法
]
采用酸碱中和原理、离子交换原理、土壤结构改良方法,将自主研发的盐碱调控剂、有机活性肥和甘草专用肥按比例合成功能性盐土改良肥,进行田间验证试验,以便对功能性盐土改良肥的改土效应作出科学的评价。[结果
]
功能性盐土改良肥最佳配方组合为:盐碱调控剂:有机活性肥:甘草专用肥为0.0724:0.9051:0.0225。功能性盐土改良肥施用量与草甸盐土总孔隙度、团聚体、持水量、阳离子交换能力(CEC)、有机质、速效氮磷钾、甘草农艺性状和根鲜重呈显著正相关关系,与容重、pH值和全盐含量呈显著的负相关关系。功能性盐土改良肥最佳施用量为24.95 t/hm
2
,甘草鲜根理论产量(y)为13.45 t/hm
2
。不同种类盐碱土改良剂对草甸盐土容重、pH值、全盐和真菌由大到小的变化顺序依次为:对照 > 沃丰隆盐碱土改良剂 > 抗盐丰盐碱土改良剂 > 功能性盐土改良肥;总孔隙度、团聚体、细菌、放线菌和酶活性由大到小的变化顺序依次为:功能性盐土改良肥 > 抗盐丰盐碱土改良剂 > 沃丰隆盐碱土改良剂 > 对照。施用功能性盐土改良肥与对照比较,容重、pH值、全盐和真菌分别降低13.38%,7.91%,39.82%和55.56%;总孔隙度、团聚体和甘草根鲜重增加15.42%,56.36%和21.62%;细菌、放线菌、蔗糖酶、脲酶、磷酸酶和多酚氧化酶分别增加60.26%,84.62%,65.23%,79.52%,68.42%和69.35%。[结论
]
在甘肃省河西走廊草甸盐土上施用功能性盐土改良肥,可以有效改善草甸盐土理化性质和生物学性质,提高土壤酶活性和持水量。
[Objective] To solve problems of drought
waterlogging
salination and infertility in salt soil and provide theoretical basis for the improvement of the saline soil in Hexi Corridor.[Method] Based on the principle of acid and alkali neutralization
ion exchange and the soil structure improvement method
we mixed in proportion of self-developed saline control agent
organic fertilizer and special fertilizer for liquorice
and carried out the field test experiments
evaluated the effect of mixed fertilizer on saline soil improvement.[Results] The fertilizer formula with the best functional improvement to saline soil was in the weight ratio:0.072 4:0.905 1:0.022 5 for salinity control agent
organic fertilizer
and special fertilizer for liquorice
respectively. The application amount of the functional improvement fertilizer was significantly and positively related to the total porosity of the meadow solonchak
the aggregate
water holding capacities
cation exchange capacity(CEC)
organic matters
available NPK
licorice agronomic characters and the fresh weight of root and were negatively related to the bulk density
pH value and the salt content. The best application amount was 24.95 t/hm2
the theoretical yield of the licorice fresh root(y) was 13.45 t/hm2. The effect of different saline soil conditioners on bulk density
pH value
total salt and fungal changed as control > Wofenglong saline soil improver > salt abundant saline soil improvement fertilizer > functional improvement fertilizer. The effects on the total porosity
the aggregate
bacteria
actinomyces and enzyme activity changes as follows:functional improvement fertilizer > salt abundant saline soil improver > Wofenglong saline soil improver > control. Compared with the control
the functional improvement fertilizer reduced bulk density
pH value
total salt and fungi respectively by 13.38%
7.91%
39.82% and 55.56%
and increased the total porosity
the aggregate and liquorice root fresh weight respectively by 15.42%
56.36% and 21.62%. Bacteria
actinomyces
sucrase
urease
phosphatase and polyphenol oxidase increased by 60.26%
84.62%
65.23%
79.52%
68.42% and 69.35%
respectively.[Conclusion] The application of functional improvement fertilizer in the meadow solonchak could effectively improve the physical
chemical and biological properties
and increase the soil enzyme activity and the water holding capacity of the meadow solonchak on the Hexi Corridor in Gansu Province.
金自学,张芬琴.河西走廊水资源变化对环境生态的影响[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(1):37-40.
赵松乔.中国干旱半干旱地区自然资源研究[M].北京:科学出版社,1988:89-95.
秦嘉海,吕彪.河西土壤与合理施肥[M].兰州:兰州大学出版社,2001.
王晓洋,陈效民,李孝良,等.不同改良剂与石膏配施对滨海盐渍土的改良效果研究[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(3):128-132.
张丹,王力华,孔涛,等.生物废弃物对滨海盐碱土改良效果[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(12):3289-3296.
赵秋,高贤彪,宁晓光,等.适用于滨海盐碱土改良剂的应用研究[J].西北农业学报,2014,23(3):107-111.
单德鑫,黄河,柳羽丰,等.改良剂组合对盐碱土的改良效果研究[J].安徽农业科学,2014,42(35):12491-12493.
石万普,俞仁培,苗春蓬,等.不同物料改良碱化土壤作用的比较[J].土壤学报,1997,34(2):221-224.
王睿彤,陆兆华,孙景宽,等.土壤改良剂对黄河三角洲滨海盐碱土的改良效应[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):239-244.
谷思玉,耿泽铭,汪睿,等.不同配比生物有机肥对盐渍土改良效果的分析[J].东北农业大学学报,2014,45(7):26-30.
安东,李新平,张永宏,等.不同土壤改良剂对碱积盐成土改良效果研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2012,26(4):239-244.
秦嘉海,吕彪.河西土壤与合理施肥[]M].兰州:兰州大学出版社,2001,150-155.
明道绪.田间试验与统计分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2014:185-188.
中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:科学技术出版社,1978:110-218.
中国土壤学会农业化学专业委员会.土壤农业化学常规分析法[M].北京:科学出版社,1983:106-208.
关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.
浙江农业大学.植物营养与肥料[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1988:268-269.
陈伦寿,李仁岗.农田施肥原理与实践[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1983:185-186.
陕西省农林学校.土壤肥料学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1987:227-228.
于秀林,任雪松.多元统计分析[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1999:166-170.
陆欣.土壤肥料学[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2004:50-52.
陕西省农林学校.土壤肥料学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1987:26-27.
0
浏览量
1280
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621