1. 德州学院 资源环境与规划学院,山东,德州,253023
2. 德州学院 生态与园林建筑学院,山东,德州,253023
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
王琰, 井大炜, 付修勇, 等. 保水剂施用量对杨树苗土壤物理性状与微生物活性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(3):53-58.
WANG Yan, JING Dawei, FU Xiuyong, et al. Effects of Application Amount of Super-absorbent Polymer on Soil Physical Characteristics and Microbial Activity Under Poplar Seedlings[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 53-58.
王琰, 井大炜, 付修勇, 等. 保水剂施用量对杨树苗土壤物理性状与微生物活性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(3):53-58. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.009.
WANG Yan, JING Dawei, FU Xiuyong, et al. Effects of Application Amount of Super-absorbent Polymer on Soil Physical Characteristics and Microbial Activity Under Poplar Seedlings[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 53-58. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.009.
[目的] 探讨保水剂不同施用量对杨树土壤物理性状与微生物活性的作用效果,为中国杨树人工林节水高产实践模式提供理论依据与技术参考。[方法] 研究CK(常规灌量)、CL(60%常规灌量配施10 g保水剂)、CM(60%常规灌量配施30 g保水剂)和CH(60%常规灌量配施50 g保水剂)4个处理对杨树苗土壤物理性状、水稳性团粒结构、微生物数量、微生物呼吸和代谢熵的影响。[结果] 同CK相比,CM处理显著降低了土壤容重,并明显提高了非毛管孔隙度,其中土壤容重分别较CK,CL和CH处理显著下降13.71%,5.31%和7.76%;还明显促进了土壤大团聚体(>0.25 mm团粒)的形成。同时,CM处理明显增加了土壤微生物总量和微生物量碳、氮含量,并显著增强了土壤微生物呼吸作用,其微生物呼吸速率分别比CK,CL和CH处理提高30.77%,11.84%和7.59%。此外,CM处理还降低了代谢熵,分别较CK,CL和CH处理下降4.81%,8.29%和9.74%。[结论] 适宜的节水灌溉措施(60%常规灌量与30 g保水剂组合)有助于改善杨树苗土壤的物理环境,并增强微生物活性。
[Objective] The effects of different application amounts of super-absorbent polymer(SAP) on soil physical characteristics and microbial activity under growing poplar were researched to provide theoretical basis and technical reference for high-yield and water-saving practice modes in Chinese poplar plantation.[Methods] Four treatments
including CK(conventional irrigation)
CL(60% conventional irrigation quantity co-applied with 10 g SAP)
CM(60% conventional irrigation quantity co-applied with 30 g SAP) and CH(60% conventional irrigation quantity co-applied with 50 g SAP) were set. Their effects on soil physical properties
water stability of crumb structure
microbial populations
microbial respiration and metabolic quotient under poplar seedlings grew in pots were determined.[Results] The CM treatment significantly reduced soil bulk density and obviously increased non-capillary porosity. The soil bulk densities decreased in 13.71%
5.31% and 7.76% as compared with those of CK
CL and CH
respectively. The formation of soil large aggregate(>0.25 mm size) was also promoted by the CM treatment. Moreover
the CM treatment observably increased total microbial populations and the contents of microbial biomass carbon and microbial biomass nitrogen. And CM treatment significantly enhanced microbial respiration
having 30.77%
11.84% and 7.59% increases in microbial respiration rate in comparison with the ones of CK
CL and CH
respectively. In addition
the metabolic quotient was reduced by the CM treatment
having 4.81%
8.29% and 9.74% decreases as compared with the ones of CK
CL and CH
respectively.[Conclusion] As a result
the proper water-saving irrigation measure(60% conventional irrigation quantity co-applied with 30 g SAP) is beneficial to improve soil physical environment and enhance soil microbial activity under poplar seedlings.
Uttam K M, Sharma K L, Venkanna K, et al. Evaluating hydrogel application on soil water availability and crop productivity in semiarid tropical red soil[J]. Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development, 2015,30(2):1-10.
曾群,蔡述明,杜耘.全球气候变化对水资源的潜在影响[J].资源环境与发展,2006,1(11):45-47.
井大炜,邢尚军,刘方春,等.畦灌配施保水剂改善杨树林下土壤物理性状提高微生物活性[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(14):116-122.
岳征文,王百田,王红柳,等.复合营养长效保肥保水剂应用及其缓释节肥效果[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(8):56-62.
井大炜,邢尚军,刘方春,等.保水剂-尿素凝胶对侧柏裸根苗细根生长和氮素利用率的影响[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(4):1046-1052.
Busscher W J, Bjorneberg D L, Sojka R E. Field application of PAM as an amendment in deep-tilled US southeastern coastal plain soils[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2009,104(2):215-220.
张丽华,闫伟平,谭国波,等.保水剂不同施用深度对玉米产量及土壤水分利用效率的影响[J].玉米科学,2016,24(1):110-113.
李希,贺纪正,郑袁明,等.新型保水剂应用于土壤-小白菜系统的环境安全评价[J].环境科学,2014,35(2):780-785.
白文波,王春艳,李茂松,等.不同灌溉条件下保水剂对新疆棉花生长及产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(10):69-76.
马海林,刘方春,马丙尧,等.保水剂对侧柏容器苗根际土壤微生物种群结构及干旱适应能力的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2016,22(1):43-48.
叶桂梅,井大炜,邢尚军,等.味精废浆与化肥配施对杨树幼苗土壤活性有机碳与微生物活性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(5):291-296.
陈帅,陈强,孙涛,等.黑土坡耕地秸秆覆盖对表层土壤结构和导气性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(1):17-21.
鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999:24-214.
井大炜,邢尚军,刘方春,等.保水剂施用方式对侧柏根际微生态环境的影响[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(5):146-154.
贾德新,李士平,王风丹,等.蚯蚓粪对豇豆根际土壤生物学特征及微生物活性的影响[J].浙江农业学报,2016,28(2):318-323.
井大炜,王明友,张红,等.鸡粪对芸豆土壤有机碳氧化稳定性与碳库管理指数的影响[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(8):192-200.
Busscher W J, Bjorneberg D L, Sojka R E. Field application of PAM as an amendment in deep-tilled US southeastern coastal plain soils[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2009,104(2):215-220.
李中阳,吕谋超,樊向阳,等.不同类型保水剂对冬小麦水分利用效率和根系形态的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(12):3753-3758.
侯贤清,李荣,何文寿,等.2种保水剂对旱作土壤物理性状及马铃薯产量的影响比较[J].核农学报,2015,29(12):2410-2417.
许紫峻,韩舒,师庆东.不同保水剂对土壤物理性质影响的探究[J].节水灌溉,2016(10):10-14.
崔英德,郭建维,阎文峰,等. SA-IP-SPS型保水剂及其对土壤物理性能的影响[J].农业工程学报,2003,19(1):28-31.
杨宁,张荣标,张永春,等.基于微生物生态效益的土壤肥力综合评价模型[J].农业机械学报,2013,44(5):108-112.
张明锦,陈良华,张健,等.马尾松人工林林窗内凋落叶微生物生物量碳和氮的动态变化[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(3):672-680.
刘洋,史薪钰,陈梦华,等.不同保水措施对退化干旱山地新植核桃园土壤养分和微生物的影响[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(4):218-222.
李小林,李强,金鑫,等.采收期松茸菌塘土壤理化特性及对细菌多样性的影响[J].微生物学通报,2016,43(3):541-549.
井大炜,王明友,张红,等.蚯蚓粪配施尿素对豇豆根系特征与根际土腐殖质的影响[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(1):212-219.
康亚龙,景峰,孙文庆,等.加工番茄连作对土壤理化性状及微生物量的影响[J].土壤学报,2016,53(2):533-542.
刘方春,马海林,杜振宇,等.根际促生细菌应用方式下金银花生长与根际环境特征[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(11):163-171.
0
浏览量
1237
下载量
15
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621