三峡库区紫色土坡耕地草本地埂植物根系分布及抗拉力学特征

周萍; 文安邦; 严冬春; 史忠林; 龙翼

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

三峡库区紫色土坡耕地草本地埂植物根系分布及抗拉力学特征

实验研究

- 三峡库区紫色土坡耕地草本地埂植物根系分布及抗拉力学特征
- Roots Distribution and Tensile Properties of Herbages on Hedge of Sloping Cultivated Lands of Purple Soils in Three Gorges Reservoir Region
- 水土保持通报 2017年37卷第3期页码：1-6
- 作者机构：
  
  中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 山地表生过程与生态调控重点实验室,四川,成都,610041
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“土质地埂对紫色土坡耕地梯化过程的作用机理”（41671286）;中国科学院科技服务网络（STS）项目“三峡库区生态清洁小流域建设技术体系试验示范”（KFJ-SW-STS-175，KFJ-EW-STS-008）;国家重点研发计划课题“多因素影响下长江泥沙来源及分布变化研究”（2016YFC0402301）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.001
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
周萍, 文安邦, 严冬春, 等. 三峡库区紫色土坡耕地草本地埂植物根系分布及抗拉力学特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(3):1-6.

ZHOU Ping, WEN Anbang, YAN Dongchun, et al. Roots Distribution and Tensile Properties of Herbages on Hedge of Sloping Cultivated Lands of Purple Soils in Three Gorges Reservoir Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 1-6.
周萍, 文安邦, 严冬春, 等. 三峡库区紫色土坡耕地草本地埂植物根系分布及抗拉力学特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(3):1-6. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.001.

ZHOU Ping, WEN Anbang, YAN Dongchun, et al. Roots Distribution and Tensile Properties of Herbages on Hedge of Sloping Cultivated Lands of Purple Soils in Three Gorges Reservoir Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 1-6. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.001.

摘要

[目的] 探究三峡库区紫色土坡耕地3种草本地埂植物根系分布及抗拉特征，为揭示地埂植物根系固结地埂提供理论依据和数据支持。[方法] 以三峡库区自然恢复的蓑草、人工种植的韭菜和蚕豆这3种草本地埂植物根系为研究对象，对比分析其根系在不同地埂土壤深度的分布规律及根系抗拉特性。[结果] （1）在0-40 cm深度土壤中3种草本地埂植物根系直径变化表现出：蚕豆根系>韭菜根系>蓑草根系。3种草本地埂植物根系直径与地埂土壤的土层深度间服从指数函数关系。（2）在0-40 cm地埂土层深度范围内，韭菜根系生物量与蓑草根系和蚕豆根系生物量之间存在显著性差异（p<0.05），韭菜和蚕豆地埂植物根系生物量随土层深度的增加而逐渐减小，蓑草地埂植物根系生物量随土层深度的增加先增加后减小。（3） 3种草本地埂植物根系的单根平均抗拉力次序为蚕豆根系（10.53 N） > 蓑草根系（6.03 N） > 韭菜根系（4.51 N），3种地埂植物根系单根抗拉力与根径呈幂函数关系（p<0.05）。3种地埂植物根系的抗拉强度表现为蓑草根系（45.91 MPa）>蚕豆根系（18.02 MPa）>韭菜根系（12.20 MPa）。（4） 3种草本地埂植物根系黏聚力变化顺序为：蓑草根系（0.0131 kPa） > 蚕豆根系（0.0094 kPa） > 韭菜根系（0.0055 kPa）且3种地埂植物根系黏聚力与土层深度呈指数函数关系（p<0.01）。[结论] 自然恢复的蓑草地埂在三峡库区较其他两种人工种植的地埂植物有更好的固结地埂效果，从而有效控制坡面土壤侵蚀和水土流失。草本植物固结地埂可为三峡库区坡耕地治理提供新思路。

Abstract

[Objective] We aimed to illustrate the roots distribution and tensile properties of three herbages on the hedge of sloping cultivated lands of purple soils in Three Gorges Reservoir region

in order to supply the theory evidence and data supports for hedge consolidation with hedge plants.[Methods] One natural herbage

Eulaliopsis binata

and two artificial herbages

Allium tuberosum and Vicia faba were selected and their root distributions and root tensile properties in different soil depths were compared.[Results] (1) Diameters of the three herbages in 0-40 cm soil depth ranked as:V. faba > A. tuberosum > E. binata. Exponential function can be used to described their relationship between their diameter and the distributed soil depth. (2) There existed obviously significant difference between the roots biomass of A. tuberosum and the root biomass of V. faba and E. binata in 0-40 cm soil depth(p<0.05). Root biomass of A. tuberosum and V. faba were both decreased with the downward distribution in soil

but the root biomass of E. binata firstly increased then decreased with the increase of soil depth. (3) Mean root tensile force of the three hedge herbages ranked as:V. faba(10.53 N) > E. binata(6.03 N) > A. tuberosum(4.51 N). And mean root tensile force was found dependent in power function upon root dimeter(p<0.05). Meanwhile

the rank of mean root tensile strength was E. binata(45.91 MPa) > V. faba(18.02 MPa) > A. tuberosum(12.20 MPa). (4) The mean root cohesion of the three herbages ranked as:E. binata(0.013 1 kPa) > V. faba(0.009 4 kPa) > A. tuberosum(0.005 5 kPa). And exponential relationship between mean root cohesion and soil depths was well fitted(p<0.01).[Conclusion] The natural hedge herbage of E. binata had better performances in soil reinforcement and soil conservation in this region

which could be used to effectively conserve soil and water from the sloping lands. And the herbage reinforcement of the hedge is a new idea for sloping cultivated land harness in the Three Gorges Reservoir region.

关键词

Keywords

references

Roering J J, Schmidt K M, Stock J D, et al. Shallow landsliding, root reinforcement, and the spatial distribution of trees in the Oregon Coast Range[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003,40(2):237-253.

De Baets S, Poesen J, Reubens B, et al. Root tensile strength and root distribution of typical Mediterranean plant species and their contribution to soil shear strength[J]. Plant and Soil, 2008,305(1/2):207-226.

Wu T H, McKinnell Ⅲ W P, Swanston D N. Strength of tree roots and landslides on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1979,16(1):19-33.

Martin D. Bioengineering techniques for stream bank restoration:A review of central European practices[C]. USA:Water shed Restoration Project Report, 1995:4-9.

宋维峰,陈丽华,刘秀萍.根系与土体接触面相互作用特性试验[J].中国水土保持科学,2006,4(2):62-65.

杨亚川,莫永京,王芝芳,等.土壤-草本植被根系复合体抗水蚀强度与抗剪强度的试验研究[J].中国农业大学学报,1996,1(2):31-38.

刘国彬,蒋定生,朱显谟.黄土区草地根系生物力学特性研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1996,2(3):21-28.

张欣,姚喜军,刘静,等.土壤孔隙水承压条件下4种根-土复合体抗剪特性[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(4):22-26.

蒋坤云,陈丽华,杨苑君,等.华北油松、落叶松根系抗拉强度与其微观结构的相关性研究[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(2):8-12.

苑淑娟,牛国权,刘静,等.瞬时拉力下两个生长期4种植物单根抗拉力与抗拉强度的研究[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(5):22-26.

熊燕梅,夏汉平,李志安,等.植物根系固坡抗蚀的效应与机理研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(4):895-904.

Waldron L J, Dakessian S. Soil reinforcement by roots:Calculation of increased soil shear resistance from root properties[J]. Soil Science, 1981,132(6):427-435..

李建兴,何丙辉,谌芸,等.不同护坡草本植物的根系分布特征及其对土壤抗剪强度的影响[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(10):144-152.

Zhang Chaobo, Chen Lihua, Liu Xiuping, et al. Triaxial compression test of soil-root composites to evaluate influence of roots on soil shear strength[J]. Ecological Engineer, 2010,36(1):19-26.

程洪,谢涛,唐春,等.植物根系力学与固土作用机理研究综述[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(1):97-102.

李勇,吴钦孝,朱显谟,等.黄土高原植物根系提高土壤抗冲性能的研究(Ⅰ):油松人工林根系对土壤抗冲性的增强效应[J].水土保持学报,1990,4(1):1-5.

周萍,文安邦,张信宝,等.植物固结地埂的水土保持功能探析[J].人民长江,2012,43(7):81-84.

赵丽兵,张宝贵.紫花苜蓿和马唐根的生物力学性能及相关因素的试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(9):7-12.

Genet M, Stokes A, Salin F, et al. The influence of cellulose content on tensile strength in tree roots[J]. Plant and Soil, 2005,278(1):1-9.

浏览量

1369

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同雨强和坡度下新安江流域典型土壤坡面的产流产沙特征

基于生态系统服务和生态敏感性评价的云中山-系舟山生态网络构建

典型黄土区人工林土壤水分与养分的区域特征

不同改良剂对滨海盐渍土盐分离子及玉米生长的影响

不同空间尺度耕地埂坎提取方法及其分布特征