1. 陇东学院 土木工程学院,甘肃,庆阳,745000
2. 甘肃省高校黄土的工程性质及工程应用省级重点实验室,甘肃,庆阳,745000
3. 庆阳市荒漠化防治研究中心,甘肃,庆阳,745000
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
张建香, 张多勇, 刘万锋, 等. 基于ESAI的黄土高原荒漠化风险评估[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(2):339-344.
ZHANG Jianxiang, ZHANG Duoyong, LIU Wanfeng, et al. ESAI Based Assessment of Desertification Risk in Loess Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(2): 339-344.
张建香, 张多勇, 刘万锋, 等. 基于ESAI的黄土高原荒漠化风险评估[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(2):339-344. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.051.
ZHANG Jianxiang, ZHANG Duoyong, LIU Wanfeng, et al. ESAI Based Assessment of Desertification Risk in Loess Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(2): 339-344. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.051.
[目的] 对黄土高原荒漠化风险进行评估,为黄土高原生态环境的恢复、建设和保护提供科学依据。[方法] 通过收集黄土高原的地形、气候、植被、土壤以及社会经济等方面的数据,借助RS和GIS平台,实现黄土高原荒漠化风险评估的空间化和数字化,在此基础上分析荒漠化的成因,构建荒漠化风险评价指标体系,建立基于环境敏感性区指标(ESAI)的荒漠化风险评估模型,分析荒漠化风险程度的空间格局,探索黄土高原不同区域荒漠化形成的主要原因。[结果](1)基于土壤、气候、植被3种要素的环境敏感区生物物理指标显示:黄土高原大约1/4的区域(25.2%)为高风险区,属于严重荒漠化,几乎2/3的区域(62.8%)是轻微荒漠化,11.5%的地区为潜在荒漠化,只有0.5%的地区无荒漠化现象;(2)加入人类诱发因素后,改变了黄土高原荒漠化风险区的原有格局。其中,极低、低度和极高度敏感区减少了5.6%,1.1%和3.8%;与此同时,较低和较高度敏感区增加了4.4%和4.5%。[结论](1)该模型能很好地说明黄土高原荒漠化风险的空间分布格局,其荒漠化程度由西北向东南地区逐渐减弱;(2)人类活动已经在一定程度上打破了长期稳定的自然生态系统,并且缩小了不同程度荒漠化之间的差距。
[Objective] The risk of desertification was evaluated in Loess Plateau to provide scientific basis for the restoration
construction and protection of ecological environment. [Methods] Data of landform
climate
vegetation
soil and other socio-economic data were collected. Spatialization and digitalization were conducted using GIS and remote sensing. Upon which
desertification reasons were analyzed
and evaluation indices and risk assessment model were framed based on index of environmentally sensitive areas. [Results] (1) According to the bio-physical index in the framed model
under the scenario only considering natural factors as soil
climate and vegetation
25.2% of Loess Plateau was determined as high desertification risk area
where desertification was worst; 62.8% and 11.5% of Loess Plateau were determined as moderate and potential desertification risk areas; only 0.5% was considered having no risk. (2) If both natural factors and human interference were considered
risk area changed: coverages of extreme low
low and extreme high risk levels decreased by 5.6%
1.1% and 3.8%
respectively; whereas
coverages of lower and higher risk levels increased by 4.4% and 4.5%. [Conclusion] (1) The ESAI model can well explain the spatial distribution pattern of desertification risk of Loess Plateau
and the degree of desertification is gradually weakened from the northwest to the southeast. (2) Human activities have upset the long-term evolved stability of the natural eco-system to some extent
and have narrowed the gap between different risk levels of desertification.
Ladisa G, Todorovic M, Trisorio L G. A GIS-based approach for desertification risk assessment in Apulia region, SE Italy[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2012,49(3):103-113.
杨军.柴达木盆地荒漠化成因分析及产生机理探讨[D].陕西西安:长安大学,2004.
Kosmas Costas, Ferrara Agostino, Briassouli Helen, et al. Methodology for mapping ESAs to desertification[M]//Kosmas C, Kirkby M. Geeson N. The MEDALUS Project-Mediterranean Desertification and Land Use. Manual on Key Indicators of Desertification and Mapping Environmentally Sensitive Areas to desertification, EUR18882, 1999:31-47.
Coscarelli Roberto, Minervino Ivana. Methods for the characterization of areas sensitive to desertification:An application to the Calabrian territory[C]//Sorriso-Valvo. Proceedings of the international conference held at Solsona[J]. Catalonia:IAHS, 2005:298-299.
张希彪,上官周平,王金成,等.陇东黄土高原农牧交错带土地荒漠化过程中自然与人为因素的定量分析[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(2):203-208.
中国科学院黄土高原综合科学考察队.黄土高原地区资源环境社会经济数据集[M].北京:中国经济出版社,1992.
Zhao Yifei, Zou Xinqing, Zhang Jianxiang, et al. Spatio-temporal variation of reference evapotranspiration and aridity index in the Loess Plateau region of China, during 1961-2012[J]. Quaternary International, 2014,349(10):196-206.
Li Zhi, Liu Wenzhao, Zhang Xunchang, et al. Impacts of land use change and climate variability on hydrology in an agricultural catchment on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2009,377(1/2):35-42.
Zhang Xunchang, Liu Wenzhao. Simulating potential response of hydrology, soil erosion, and crop productivity to climate change in Changwu tableland region on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2005,131(3/4):127-142.
Sun Wenyi, Shao Quanqin, Liu Jiyuan, et al. Assessing the effects of land use and topography on soil erosion on the Loess Plateau in China[J]. Catena, 2014,121(7):151-163.
Agostino F, Luca S, Adele S A, et al. Performance evaluation and cost assessment of a key indicator system to monitor desertification vulnerability[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012,23(5):123-129.
Gad A, Lofty I. Use of remote sensing and GIS in mapping the environmental sensitivity areas for desertification of Egyptian territory[J]. Earth Discussions, 2008,3(2):41-85.
Ferrara Agostino. Expert system for evaluating the Environmental Sensitivity Index(ESI)of a local area[EB/OL]. (2005-02-03)[2005-10-23]. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/projects/desertlinks/indicatorsystem/index.htm.
王慧芳,邵明安,王国丽.黄土高原土石山区碎石分布特征及其导水性质分析[J].灌溉排水学报,2010,29(3):116-120.
Bagnouls Franco. L'indice xérothermique[R]. Paris:Bulletin de l'Association de Géographes francais, 1952.
Sharply A N, Williams J R. Epic-erosion Productivity Impact Calculator(I):Model Documentation[M]. Washington D C:US Department of Agriculture,1990.
石建华,喻理飞,孙保平.陕北地区退耕还林生态健康评价分析研究:以吴起县为例[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(6):332-336.
ANPA. Centro Tematico Nazionale Conservazione della Natura. Selezione di indicatori ambientali per itemi relativi alla biosfera[C]. Roma:RTI CTN_CON, 2000.
0
浏览量
2585
下载量
9
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621