甘肃农业大学 管理学院,甘肃,兰州,730070
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
乔蕻强, 程文仕, 程东林, 等. 基于DPSIR模型的土地整治规划环境影响评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(2):308-312.
QIAO Hongqiang, CHENG Wenshi, CHENG Donglin, et al. Impact Evaluation of Land Consolidation Planning on Environment Based on DPSIR Model[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(2): 308-312.
乔蕻强, 程文仕, 程东林, 等. 基于DPSIR模型的土地整治规划环境影响评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(2):308-312. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.047.
QIAO Hongqiang, CHENG Wenshi, CHENG Donglin, et al. Impact Evaluation of Land Consolidation Planning on Environment Based on DPSIR Model[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(2): 308-312. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.047.
[目的] 对甘肃省庆阳市20个土地整治规划环境影响进行评价,为黄土高原山区的土地整治项目环评提供借鉴。[方法] 基于DPSIR(驱动力-压力-状态-影响-响应)模型,建立科学合理的评价指标体系,对庆阳市20个土地整治规划项目环境影响进行评价。[结果](1)人均GDP与新增耕地量对土地整治变化具有较强的驱动作用;土壤污染情况对生态环境的压力最为突出;城市的森林覆盖率对项目区土地资源状态有重要影响;公众对环境的满意度对各类土地整治变化及其人口、资源和环境所产生影响相对突出;固体废弃物综合利用对环境影响的响应最突出。(2)研究区域环境影响的综合评价最大值和最小值分别为镇原县山岔镇周家庄土地整治项目(0.256 9)和庆城县太白梁乡庙山土地整理项目(0.130 4)。[结论] 各个项目区的综合指标基本在0.150 0~0.250 0浮动,说明庆阳市20个项目区生态环境提升潜力较大。
[Objective] Land renovation and the subsequent environmental impact were assessed in 20 land consolidation plans in Qingyang City of Gansu Province to provide a reference for environmental impact assessment by land consolidation in the mountainous area of eht Loess Plateau.[Methods] Based on the DPSIR(driving-force-pressure-state-impact-response) model
a scientific and reasonable evaluation index system was established to assess the environmental impacts of land consolidation in Qingyang City. [Results] (1) The per capita GDP and the increment of arable land had strong driving effect on land change. Impact on ecological environment was prominent by land pollution. City's forest coverage had an important effect on variation of land resources. People's feeling to environment was important with regard to land management
and the interlinks among population
resources and environment
as well. The impact of comprehensive utilization of solid waste was mostly important. (2) The maximum comprehensive environmental impact of land consolidation was assessed at 0.256 9 in Zhoujia village
Shancha Town
Zhenyuan County
and the minimum one was assessed at 0.130 4 in Miaoshan mountain
Taibailiang Town
Qingcheng County. [Conclusion] The comprehensive indexes of all the 20 consolidation areas largely varied between 0.150 0 to 0.250
indicating that the ecological environment in Qingyang City has great improvement potentiality.
陈光建.土地利用总体规划环境影响评价指标体系研究:以邛崃市土地利用总体规划为例[D].四川成都:中国科学院研究生院,2006.
国土资源部土地整理中心.土地开发整理标准[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2000.
李岩.土地整理的区域生态环境影响及其综合效益评价研究:以山东宁阳县土地整理为例[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学,2007.
翟小娟,申文金,田磊.土地整理规划规划环境影响评价研究[J].国土资源科技管理,2011,28(2):18-22.
王军,罗明,龙花楼.土地整理生态评价的方法与案例[J].自然资源学报,2013,18(3):363-367.
范金梅,王磊,陈原.关于中国农地整理中预测性环境影响评价问题[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(10):74-77.
蒋一军,于海英,王晓霞.土地整理中生态环境影响评价的理论探讨[J].中国软科学,2004(10):131-134.
艾东,朱道林,赫晓霞.土地整理与生态环境建设关系初探[J].生态环境,2007,16(1):257-263.
胡廷兰,杨志峰.农用土地整理的生态效益评价方法[J].农业工程学报,2004,20(5):275-280.
李文慧,李振国,李朝奎,等.基于生态足迹理论的土地整理规划可持续性评价:以湖南省韶山市为例[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(1):300-302,305.
安晨,刘世梁,李新举,等.景观生态学原理在土地整理中的应用[J].地域研究与开发,2009,28(6):68-74.
曹顺爱,余万军,吴次芳,等.农地整理对土地景观格局影响的定量分析[J].中国土地科学,2006,20(5):32-37.
王瑷玲,赵庚星,王瑞燕,等.区域土地整理生态环境评价及其时空配置[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(8):1481-1484.
高中贵,彭补拙.农地整理生态环境风险综合分析与评价:以广西柳州市融安县为例[J].资源科学,2007,27(2):45-50.
董霁红,卞正富,狄春雷.土地开发整理的生态安全评价:以江苏黄河故道为例[J].地域研究与开发,2006,25(1):106-110.
喻光明,胡秀丽,张敏,等.土地整理的生态风险评价[J].安全与环境学报,2007,7(6):83-88.
蔡玉梅,谢俊奇.2000年以来中国土地利用规划研究综述[J].中国土地科学,2006,20(6):58-61.
0
浏览量
3365
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621