1. 中国科学院 地理科学与资源研究所 资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室,北京,100101
2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
3. 南京信息工程大学 地理与遥感学院,江苏,南京,210044
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
李鑫杨, 刘庆生, 白淑英. 四川省雅安市泥石流灾害危险性评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(2):278-283.
LI Xinyang, LIU Qingsheng, BAI Shuying. Evaluation of Debris Flow Hazard in Ya'an City of Sichuan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(2): 278-283.
李鑫杨, 刘庆生, 白淑英. 四川省雅安市泥石流灾害危险性评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(2):278-283. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.042.
LI Xinyang, LIU Qingsheng, BAI Shuying. Evaluation of Debris Flow Hazard in Ya'an City of Sichuan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(2): 278-283. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.042.
[目的] 对四川省雅安市泥石流灾害危险性进行评价,为科学合理地预测和应对该区泥石流的发生提供科学依据。[方法] 首先构建危险性评价指标体系,选取3类8个评价因子并进行量化分级,再用层次分析法(AHP)给指标赋权重,最后用危险性评价模型叠置分析评价因子,进行雅安市危险度区划,将雅安市范围的泥石流危险性级别分为轻度(Ⅰ)、中度(Ⅱ)、较高(Ⅲ)、高度(Ⅳ)。[结果] 宝兴县的Ⅳ区域占比(8.8%)最小,整体泥石流危险性最低。天全县危险性相对偏低。雨城区、芦山县、名山区的Ⅳ级都占比约20.0%,整体泥石流危险性居中;荥经县和汉源县整体泥石流危险性偏高,Ⅳ级占比约45.0%;石棉县的泥石流危险性最高,Ⅳ级区域占比高达57.4%,Ⅲ级区域占比高达24.4%。[结论] 加强预防高度危险区的泥石流灾害能力,警惕较高危险区泥石流潜在危险性。采用合理有效的措施(灾害监测,气象预报,植树种草)将雅安市泥石流危险性尽可能降低。
[Objective] The risk of debris flow in Ya'an City was evaluated to provide scientific basis for predicting and dealing with debris flow scientifically and reasonably. [Methods] Firstly
a quantitative-hierarchy factors assessing system
including nine factors of three categories
was established. The factors were weighted by method of analytic hierarchy process(AHP). Finally
assessment model of hazard was applied to the spatial overlay analysis and took debris flow hazard division in Ya'an City. The division map of debris flow hazard included low-risk zone(I)
risk zone(Ⅱ)
high-risk zone(Ⅲ)and higher-risk zone(Ⅳ). [Results] Baoxing county had the lowest risk
only 8.8% was covered by Ⅳ zone.Risk of debris flow in Tianquan County was determined as fairly low as well. About 20.0% of Yucheng
Lushan
Mingshan County are covered by Ⅳ zone
and the two counties have moderate level risk. Risk of debris flow in Yingjing and Hanyuan County is fairly high
Ⅳ zone covered 45.0% approximately. The debris flow risk in Shimian County hits the top. The percent of Ⅳ going up to 57.4%
and the percent of Ⅲ up to 24.4%. [Conclusion] The capacity of debris flow disaster should be enhanced in prevention of Ⅳ grade risk
be alert to the potential danger in Ⅲ. The measures have monitoring
weather forecast
tree and grass plantation.
张迎春.铁路泥石流灾害风险评价与防治研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2007.
钟敦伦.1981年四川暴雨泥石流[J].大自然探索,1982(1):52-58.
李辉霞.雅安地区水土流失危险度评价、分区和发展趋势分析[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(6):17-19.
刘希林,苏鹏程.四川省泥石流风险评价[J].灾害学,2004,19(2):23-28.
陈宜娟,刘希林,赵源.四川省雅安市泥石流风险区划[C]//中国灾害防御协会风险分析专业委员会.中国灾害防御协会风险分析专业委员会第二届年会论文集(1).北京:应用基础与工程科学学报,2006.
刘希林,陈宜娟.泥石流风险区划方法及其应用:以四川西部地区为例[J].地理科学,2010,30(4):558-565.
于金蓉,鞠丽红,李显.基于GIS空间建模的泥石流危险度评估[J].科学中国人,2014(4):30.
刘丽娜.芦山地震区泥石流易发性评价[D].北京:中国地质大学,2015.
王家柱,任光明,余天斌,等.四川芦山震区大叶龙沟泥石流发育特征及危险度评价[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2015,26(4):1-5.
Saaty T L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M]. Mc Graw:Hill Company,1980:2271.
王庆满,王家鼎,谷天峰,等.GIS和层次分析法在地震地质灾害小区划中的应用[J].长江大学学报:自然科学版,2011,8(11):28-29.
祁元,刘勇,杨正华,等.基于GIS的兰州滑坡与泥石流灾害危险性分析[J].冰川冻土,2012,34(1):96-104.
陈国玉.喜马拉雅山中部地区泥石流危险性评价研究[D].吉林长春:吉林大学,2010.
王霖琳. GIS支持下的泰山地区泥石流危险性评价研究[D].山东济南:山东农业大学,2004.
朱红春.数字高程模型(DEM)空间数据挖掘研究[D].陕西西安:西北大学,2003.
王琼,杨武年,南聪强,何祯明.基于RS和GIS的水土流失评价:以四川省若尔盖县为例[J].中国水土保持,2011(9):33-36.
韩金华.基于GIS的白龙江流域泥石流危险性评价研究[D].甘肃兰州:兰州大学,2010.
0
浏览量
1276
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621