1. 南京农业大学 公共管理学院,江苏,南京,210095
2. 江苏省耕地质量与农业环境保护站,江苏,南京,210036
3. 南京农业大学 资源与环境科学学院,江苏,南京,210095
4. 江苏省互联网农业发展中心,江苏,南京,210036
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
付文凤, 姜海, 房娟娟, 等. 竺山湾湖滨缓冲带生态工程综合效益评价——以江苏省宜兴市周铁镇为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(2):268-273.
FU Wenfeng, JIANG Hai, FANG Juanjuan, et al. Evaluation on Comprehensive Benefits of Lake Buffer Zone Ecological Engineering in Zhushan Bay-Taking an Example of Zhoutie Town, Yixing City, Jiangsu Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(2): 268-273.
付文凤, 姜海, 房娟娟, 等. 竺山湾湖滨缓冲带生态工程综合效益评价——以江苏省宜兴市周铁镇为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(2):268-273. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.040.
FU Wenfeng, JIANG Hai, FANG Juanjuan, et al. Evaluation on Comprehensive Benefits of Lake Buffer Zone Ecological Engineering in Zhushan Bay-Taking an Example of Zhoutie Town, Yixing City, Jiangsu Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(2): 268-273. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.040.
[目的] 对江苏省竺山湾地区宜兴市周铁镇湖滨缓冲带生态工程的综合效益进行评价,定量分析生态工程建设的价值,为太湖及其他流域湖滨缓冲带生态工程建设效益评价提供借鉴和参考。[方法] 在长期定点观测周铁镇竺山湾湖滨缓冲带生态工程建设和运行基础上,从生态、社会、经济3层面构建包括水质净化、涵养水源、保护生物多样性、大气调节、提供就业、科研教育、社会稳定、旅游休闲、提供水产品等内容的综合效益评价指标体系,运用成果参照法、影子工程法、旅行费用法、条件价值法、替代法、直接市场法等对各项指标价值进行评价。[结果] 周铁镇湖滨缓冲带生态工程综合效益价值约为176.66万元/a,生态效益、社会效益、经济效益的价值分别为125.55,33.61和17.5万元/a,表现为:生态效益 > 社会效益 > 经济效益。单项指标价值对比发现,水质净化价值最大,达60.52万元/a,大气调节价值次之,为47.15万元/a。[结论] 周铁镇湖滨缓冲带生态工程建设有效改善了湖泊水环境,生态效益最为显著,符合生态工程建设的生态效益优先原则。
[Objective] The objective of this research is to evaluate comprehensive benefits of ecological engineering in the lake buffer zone in Zhushan Bay in Zhoutie Town
Yixing City
Jiangsu Province to quantitatively analyze the value of ecological conservation and to provide a basis and reference for the benefit assessment of ecological engineering in Taihu Lake basin and other watersheds. [Methods] Based on long-term fixed point observation of the ecological engineering construction in Zhoutie Town
we build an evaluation system from three aspects of economy
society and ecology. Indicators of evaluation system include water purification
water conservation
protection of biological diversity
air modulation
providing employment opportunities
research and education
social stability
leisure tourism
aquatic production and so on. Methods of indicators value evaluation are reference method
shadow project method
travel cost method
contingent valuation method
substitution method and direct market method. [Results] The comprehensive benefit of lake buffer zone ecological engineering in Zhoutie Town is 1.766 6 million yuan per year
including 1.255 5 million yuan per year of ecological benefits
336.1 thousand yuan per year of social benefits and 175 thousand yuan per year of economic benefits
that means ecological benefits > social benefits > economic benefits. The result of single index value comparison found that the value of water purification is largest
up to 605.2 thousand yuan per year. The following is the value of air modulation
which is 471.5 thousand yuan per year. [Conclusion] Ecological engineering in Zhoutie Town effectively improved the aquatic environment of lakes. The ecological benefit is most remarkable
which is in accordance with the principal that priority of ecological value is in priority in ecological engineering.
太湖流域管理局.太湖流域及东南诸河水资源公报(2014年)[R].上海:太湖流域管理局,2015.
路云霞,吴长年,黄戟,等.由"无锡太湖水华事件"论太湖富营养化的防治[J].生态学杂志,2007,14(2)155-157.
陈荷生.太湖生态修复治理工程[J].长江流域资源与环境,2001,10(2):173-178.
Mark E G, Anthony T O, David L. Vegetative Filter Strips for Nonpoint Source Pollution Control in Agriculture[M]. California:Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 2006.
Ye Chun, Li Chunhua, Yu Haichan, et al. Study on ecological restoration in near-shore zone of a eutrophic lake, Wuli Bay, Taihu Lake[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2011,37(9):1434-1437.
叶春,李春华,陈小刚,等.太湖湖滨带类型划分及生态修复模式研究[J].湖泊科学,2012,24(6):822-828.
颜昌宙,金相灿,赵景柱,等.湖滨带退化生态系统的恢复与重建[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(2):360-364.
Hees P A W V, Jones D L, Nyberg L, et al. Modelling low molecular weight organic acid dynamics in forest soils[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2005,37(3):517-531.
Woodward R T, Wui Y S. The economic value of wetland services:A meta-analysis[J]. Ecological Economics, 2001,37(2):257-270.
徐婷,徐跃,江波,等.贵州草海湿地生态系统服务价值评估[J].生态学报,2015,35(13):4295-4303.
王凤珍,周志翔,郑忠明.城郊过渡带湖泊湿地生态服务功能价值评估:以武汉市严东湖为例[J].生态学报,2011,31(7):1946-1954.
韩美,张晓慧.黄河三角洲湿地主导生态服务功能价值估算[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2009,19(6):37-43.
果超,孙保平,方思超,等.儋州市退耕还林工程生态效益评价[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(4):308-313.
赖亚飞,朱清科,张宇清,等.吴旗县退耕还林生态效益价值评估[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(3):83-87.
郑国权,杨宪杰,温美丽,等.广东省小流域综合治理效益的定量评价:以瑶安小流域为例[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(4):237-243.
许罗丹,黄安平.水环境改善的非市场价值评估:基于西江流域居民条件价值调查的实证分析[J].中国农村经济,2014(2):69-81.
Iamtrakul P, Student D, Teknomo K, et al. Public park valuation using travel cost method[J]. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 2005(5):1249-1264.
王昌海,温亚利,李强,等.秦岭自然保护区群的社会效益计量研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(7):113-121.
赵玲,王尔大.基于Meta分析的自然资源效益转移方法的实证研究[J].资源科学,2011,33(1):31-40.
谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
孟宪民,崔保山,邓伟,等.松嫩流域特大洪灾的醒示:湿地功能的再认识[J].自然资源学报,1999,14(1):14-21.
李金昌.生态价值论[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,1999.
Costanza R D, Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387(15):235-260.
黄玉洁.太湖典型湿地恢复区植物群落及沉积物特征[D].江苏南京:南京林业大学,2011.
房娟娟,付文凤,赵海燕,等.湖滨带农村常住居民支浜生态修复需求与支付意愿:以太湖竺山湾地区为例[J].嘉兴学院学报,2015,27(1):88-92.
阿雷莫夫,塔拉索娃.风险评价与管理[M].邢涛,译.北京:对外经济贸易大学出版社,2011.
0
浏览量
1280
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621