基于耕地非市场价值的三峡库区消落带生态休耕补偿标准研究

尹珂; 肖轶

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.036

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于耕地非市场价值的三峡库区消落带生态休耕补偿标准研究

试验研究

- 基于耕地非市场价值的三峡库区消落带生态休耕补偿标准研究
- Economic Compensation Criteria of Eco-fallow Based on Non-market Value of Cultivated Land in Water-level Fluctuation Zone of Three Gorges Reservoir Area
- 水土保持通报 2017年37卷第2期页码：239-246
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院,重庆,400047
  2. 重庆工商大学旅游与国土资源学院,重庆,400067
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  重庆市教委科学技术研究项目“重庆市三峡库区消落带农户生计资本差异对生态休耕行为的影响研究”（KJ1500337）;教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重庆工商大学长江上游经济研究中心开放基金项目（1456005）;国家自然科学基金项目（4120159,1301654）;教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目（13YJCZH207）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.036
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
尹珂, 肖轶. 基于耕地非市场价值的三峡库区消落带生态休耕补偿标准研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(2):239-246.

YIN Ke, XIAO Yi. Economic Compensation Criteria of Eco-fallow Based on Non-market Value of Cultivated Land in Water-level Fluctuation Zone of Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(2): 239-246.
尹珂, 肖轶. 基于耕地非市场价值的三峡库区消落带生态休耕补偿标准研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(2):239-246. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.036.

YIN Ke, XIAO Yi. Economic Compensation Criteria of Eco-fallow Based on Non-market Value of Cultivated Land in Water-level Fluctuation Zone of Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(2): 239-246. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.036.

摘要

[目的

]

对三峡库区消落带耕地非市场价值进行评估，为生态休耕经济补偿标准的厘定提供参考。[方法

]

通过双边界二分式CVM法开展评估和分析。[结果

]

（1）受访者基本可以构建起CVM假想市场，问卷理解度调查显示受访者的理解度达84.73%，调查可信度较高。（2）受访者支付意愿存在较大差异，农户愿意支付率达到75.65%，城镇居民愿意支付率仅占到64.80%。（3）Probit回归模型与Logit回归模型分析表明，收入状况是影响受访者支付意愿的主要因素。[结论

]

以受访者单位耕地支付意愿1 516.76元/（hm

·a）作为该区的生态休耕经济补偿标准，则所涉及的三峡库区9区县消落带耕地的非市场价值约为30.15亿元。

Abstract

[Objective] The low compensation leads to extensive cultivation on hydro-fluctuation belt

which continue to affect the water environment in the reservoir area. The compensation criteria should be redefined based on the value of cultivated land resources. [Methods] We adopt double-bounded dichotomous contingent valuation method(CVM) to evaluate the non-market benefits of cultivated land in the water-level fluctuation zone of Three Gorges Reservoir area

which is to provide reference for economic compensation criteria of eco-fallow. [Results] (1) The interviewees are basically able to build up the CVM hypothetical market

and the reliability of survey data is high because the questionnaire survey showed that interviewees'understanding level reached 84.73%. (2) The interviewees'willing to pay(WTP) is obviously different between households and urban residents

the former's WTP is 75.65% but the latter's WTP is only 64.80%. (3) The Probit regression model and Logit regression model analysis showed that income is the main factor affecting the interviewees'WTP. [Conclusion] We take the interviewees'WTP 1 516.76 yuan/(hm2·a) as economic compensation criteria of eco-fallow in this area

so the non-market benefits of cultivated land is 3.015×109 yuan in the research area.

关键词

Keywords

references

Pearce D W, Moran D. The Economic Value of Biodiversity[M]. Cambridge:Earthscan Publications, 1994.

Costanza R, Arge R, Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature, 1987,387(15):253-260.

李景刚,欧名豪,张效军,等.耕地资源价值重建及其货币化评价:以青岛市为例[J].自然资源学报,2009,24(11):1870-188.

谭永忠,陈佳,王庆日,等.基于选择试验模型的基本农田非市场价值评估:以浙江省德清县为例[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(11):1981-1994.

王冬银,杨庆媛,何涛.重庆市耕地资源非市场价值估算[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(10):76-82.

鄂施璇,宋戈.东北区县域耕地资源非市场价值测算及其空间分布[J].经济地理,2015,35(6):149-153.

樊辉,赵敏娟.自然资源非市场价值评估的选择试验法:原理及应用分析[J].资源科学,2013,35(7):1347-1354.

王瑞雪.耕地非市场价值评估理论方法与实践[D].湖北武汉:华中农业大学,2005.

Dorfman J H, Barnett B J, Bergstrom J C, et al. Searching for farmland preservation markets:Evidence from the Southeastern U S[J]. Land Use Policy, 2008,26(1):121-129.

Cho Seong-Hoon, Newman D H, Bowker J M. Measuring rural homeowners'willingness to pay for land conservation easements[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2005,7(5):757-770.

Banzhaf H S. Economics at the fringe:Non-market valuation studies and their role in land use plans in the United States[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2010, 91(3):592-602.

Chang Koyin, Ying Yunghsiang. External benefits of preserving agricultural land:Taiwan's rice fields[J]. The Social Science Journal, 2005,42(2):285-293.

王湃,凌雪冰,张安录.CVM评估休闲农地的存在价值:以武汉市和平农庄为例[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(6):66-71.

牛海鹏,张安录.耕地保护的外部性及其测算:以河南省焦作市为例[J].资源科学,2009,31(8):1400-1408.

诸培新,任艳利,曲福田.经济发达地区耕地非市场价值及居民支付意愿研究:以南京市为例[J].中国土地科学,2010,24(6):50-55.

金建君,江冲.选择试验模型法在耕地资源保护中的应用:以浙江省温岭市为例[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(10):1750-1757.

Desvousges W H, Johnson F R, Dunford R W, et al. Measuring natural resource damages with contingent valuation:tests of validity and reliability[R]//Hausman J A. Contingent valuation:a critical assessment. Amsterdam:NorthHolland, 1993.

Loomis J B, Walsh R G. Recreation Economic Decisions, Comparing Benefits and Costs[M]. State College, Pennsylvania:Venture Publishing, Inc., 1997.

Carson R T. Contingent valuation:A user's guide[J]. Environmental Scientific & Technology, 2000,34(8):1413-1418.

Venkatachalam L. The contingent valuation method:A review[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2004,24(1):89-124.

刘治国,李国平.陕北地区非再生能源资源开发的环境破坏损失价值评估[J].统计研究,2006(3):61-66.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Report of the NOAA Panel on contingent valuation[J]. Federal Register, 1993,58(10):4601-4614.

喻燕,卢新海.意愿评估法在农地非使用价值评估中的改进[J].中国土地科学,2010,24(l):15-21.

浏览量

1503

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

中国典型河口三角洲生态系统服务价值的时空异质性

海河流域气候-土地利用-生态治理对水生态系统服务的影响

数字经济对长江经济带农业生态产品价值转化效率的影响

西北地区生态产品价值实现成效评价——基于29个典型案例

不同改良剂对滨海盐渍土盐分离子及玉米生长的影响