封育年限对干旱河谷灌丛土壤理化性质的影响

赵栋; 屠彩芸; 李丹春

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.006

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

封育年限对干旱河谷灌丛土壤理化性质的影响

试验研究

- 封育年限对干旱河谷灌丛土壤理化性质的影响
- Effects of Fencing Time on Soil Physicochemical Properties of Sophora Viciifolia in Semi-arid Valley
- 水土保持通报 2017年37卷第2期页码：39-44
- 作者机构：
  
  白龙江林业管理局林业科学研究所,甘肃,兰州,730070
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  甘肃省科技计划项目“拱坝河流域典型森林类型土壤有机碳及养分空间异质性研究”（1506RJZK179）;中央财政推广项目“白龙江干旱河谷乡土树种育苗与植被恢复技术推广示范”（[2015]ZYTG03）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.006
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
赵栋, 屠彩芸, 李丹春. 封育年限对干旱河谷灌丛土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(2):39-44.

ZHAO Dong, TU Caiyun, LI Danchun. Effects of Fencing Time on Soil Physicochemical Properties of Sophora Viciifolia in Semi-arid Valley[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(2): 39-44.
赵栋, 屠彩芸, 李丹春. 封育年限对干旱河谷灌丛土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(2):39-44. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.006.

ZHAO Dong, TU Caiyun, LI Danchun. Effects of Fencing Time on Soil Physicochemical Properties of Sophora Viciifolia in Semi-arid Valley[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(2): 39-44. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.006.

摘要

[目的

]

探讨不同封育年限对干旱河谷灌丛土壤理化性质的影响，为该地区的天然植被恢复与管理提供理论依据。[方法

]

采用野外调查和实验室分析相结合的方法开展研究。[结果

]

（1）封育后灌木层的盖度、密度、平均冠幅、高度明显升高，而草本层则相反。（2）随着封育年限的增加，土壤容重呈V形变化，封育13 a达到最小值，而群落植被特征、土壤孔隙度、土壤持水量、土壤养分，呈倒V形变化，封育13 a达到最大值。0-40 cm，封育13 a的土壤平均速效N，P，K较未封育草地分别增加26.42%，107.35%，33.92%；全量N，P，K含量分别增加了168.42%，47.62%和31.12%。（3）封育后，土壤理化性质有所改善，具有明显的表聚现象，土壤固碳能力有所提高，土壤有机碳密度表现为：F

> F

> CK；土壤有机碳储量表现为：F

> F

> CK，说明在狼牙刺群落封育恢复过程中，土壤环境有较为明显的改善。（4）采取封育措施后，外界干扰减少，狼牙刺灌丛覆盖度增加，从而增加地上生物量，使生产力得到提升，生物量与封育年限存在线型关系。[结论

]

采取封育措施后，干旱河谷地带的狼牙刺群落植被特征和土壤理化性质及有机碳密度和储量均优于未封育，植被自然恢复状态良好。

Abstract

[Objective] The effects of different fencing time on physical-chemical property of soil in arid valley shrub were studied to provide theoretical basis for the restoration and management of natural vegetation in this region. [Methods] Field investigation and laboratory analysis were used. [Results] (1) Coverage

density

average canopy and height of the shrub layer were significantly increased after hillsides closing

but it is opposite for the herb layer. (2) With the increase of closing age

soil bulk density showed a V-shaped change and reached the minimum value in 13 a. However

vegetation community characteristics

soil porosity

soil water retention capability and soil nutrient all showed an inverted V-shaped curve

they reached the maximum values around 13 a after the hillsides was closed. As compared with the no closing hillsides

the average soil available N

K in 0-40 cm layer increased by 26.42%

26.42%

107.35%

respectively; total amount of N

K content increased by 168.42%

47.62% and 31.12%. (3) After closing hillsides to facilitate afforestation was conducted

obvious surface convergence phenomenon was observed. Soil physio-chemical properties and carbon sequestration capacity increased. Soil organic carbon densities of plots(F) with different closing ages(n) showed as the following rank: F13 > F22 > F30 > F5 > CK. Soil organic carbon reserves was showed as: F5 > F13 > F22 > F30 > CK. It is showed that soil environment had more obvious improvement in Sophora viciifolia community along restoration process. (4) After close hillsides to facilitate afforestation was carried out

interference was decreased

the coverage of Sophora viciifolia bushes got increased

aboveground biomass and productivity also got increased. There was a positively linear relationship between biomass and closing hillsides to facilitate afforestation age. [Conclusion] After close hillsides to facilitate afforestation was carried out

Sophora viciifolia community vegetation characteristics

soil physio-chemical properties

soil organic carbon density and reserves were all better than the corresponding ones of no closing hillsides.

关键词

Keywords

references

刘国华,傅伯杰,陈利顶,等.中国生态退化的主要类型、特征和分布[J].生态学报,2002.20(1):13-19.

陈国鹏,曹秀文,王会儒,等.白龙江干旱河谷岩生植物持水性能[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):43-46.

樊宏,张建平.岷江上游干旱河谷土地利用/土地覆盖研究[J].中国沙漠,2002,22(3):273-278.

Johnson K H, Vogt K A, Clark H J, et al. Biodiversity and the productivity and stability of ecosystems[J].Trends in Ecological Evolution, 1996,11(9):372-377.

章家恩,徐琪.现代生态学研究的几大热点问题透视[J].地理科学进展,1997,16(3):29-37.

刘国华,傅伯杰,陈利顶,等.中国生态退化的主要类型、特征和分布[J].生态学报,2002,20(1):13-19.

彭少麟.恢复生态学与植被重建[J].生态科学,1996,15(2):26-31.

彭少麟,陆宏芳.恢复生态学焦点问题[J].生态学报,2003,23(7):249-257.

杨晓晖,张克斌,侯瑞萍,等.封育措施对半干旱沙地草场植被群落特征及地上生物量的影响[J].生态环境,2005,14(5):730-734.

任海,彭少麟.恢复生态学导论[M].北京:科学出版社,2001:28-134.

沈彦,冯起勇,张克斌,等.围栏封育对农牧交错区沙化草地植物群落影响:以宁夏盐池为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2008(6):156-159.

赵栋,刘锦乾,杨永红,等.白龙江水源涵养林不同林龄土壤性状[J].安徽农业科学,2013,41(32):12616-12619.

冶民生,吴斌,关文彬,等.岷江干旱河谷主要草本种群生态位研究[J].青海大学学报:自然科学版,2008,26(5):48-53.

国家林业局.中华人民国和国林业行业标准:森林土壤分析方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2000:75-115.

岳曼,常庆瑞,王飞,等.土壤有机碳储量研究进展[J].土壤通报,2008,39(5):1173-1178.

徐艳,张凤荣,段增强,等.区域土壤有机碳密度及碳储量计算方法探讨[J].土壤通报,2005,36(6):836-839.

单贵莲,初晓辉,田青松,等.典型草原恢复演替过程中土壤性状动态变化研究[J].草业学报,2012,21(4):1-9.

王丹丹,郑纪勇,颜永毫,等.生物炭对宁南山区土壤持水性能影响的定位研究[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(2):101-104.

刘国华,马克明,傅伯杰,等.岷江干旱河谷主要灌类型地上生物量研究[J].生态学报,2003,23(9):1757-1764.

邵新庆,石永红,韩建国,等.典型草原自然演替过程中土壤理化性质动态变化[J].草地学报,2008,16(6):566-571.

何念鹏,周道玮,吴泠.极端干旱干扰下松嫩草原土壤含水量与植物的反映[J].干旱区资源与环境,2001,15(3):53-56.

苏永中,赵哈林.持续放牧和封育对科尔沁退化沙地草地碳截存的影响[J].环境科学,2003,24(4):23-28.

蒋德明,曹成有,李雪华,等.科尔沁沙地植被恢复及其对土壤的改良效应[J].生态环境,2008,17(3):1135-1139.

浏览量

1173

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同改良剂对滨海盐渍土盐分离子及玉米生长的影响

林火干扰对云南松林土壤养分和生态化学计量特征的影响

砒砂岩区4种人工林林下草本植物多样性与土壤理化性质

颗粒状白酒污泥对土壤养分及重金属含量的影响

长期施肥对黄土区连作苜蓿草地植被特征的影响