1. 珠江水利委员会 珠江流域水土保持监测中心站,广东,广州,510611
2. 珠江水利委员会 珠江水利科学研究院,广东,广州,510611
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
寇馨月, 黄俊, 姜学兵, 等. 不同下垫面径流小区次降雨对产流产沙的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(2):27-31.
KOU Xinyue, HUANG Jun, JIANG Xuebing, et al. Effects of Rainfall on Runoff and Sediment Under Different Underlying Surfaces of Runoff Plots[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(2): 27-31.
寇馨月, 黄俊, 姜学兵, 等. 不同下垫面径流小区次降雨对产流产沙的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(2):27-31. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.004.
KOU Xinyue, HUANG Jun, JIANG Xuebing, et al. Effects of Rainfall on Runoff and Sediment Under Different Underlying Surfaces of Runoff Plots[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(2): 27-31. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.02.004.
[目的] 揭示南方红壤区人工径流小区次降雨对径流泥沙作用规律,为区域水土保持工程实践与基础理论研究提供参考。[方法] 基于云南摩布小流域3种下垫面(林地、农地、裸地)人工径流小区2013-2015年自然降雨观测资料,采用M-K趋势检验、灰色相关分析及双累积曲线等方法研究了次降雨量、径流量、泥沙量和入渗率的变化趋势及相关关系,以及降雨因子对径流泥沙的影响。[结果](1)2013-2015年摩布径流小区月降雨均呈先增加后减少的波动性变化趋势,3 a降雨量无显著性变化趋势。(2)相同降雨量各下垫面径流小区产流差异显著(p<0.05),其中林地最小,农地次之,裸地最大;3种下垫面次降雨径流深增长速率大小规律与此相同。(3)次降雨产沙量与降雨量、径流量均存在密切相关关系,相关系数分别为0.67~0.82,0.69~0.85。径流小区产沙能力随雨强增大而增强。相同雨量下,林地产沙能力最小,而裸地累积产沙量增速最大。(4)3个径流小区的入渗率均随降雨量和雨强增大而增大,其中林地入渗率最大,平均入渗率为94.03%;裸地入渗率最小,平均入渗率为86.28%。[结论] 与农地和裸地相比,林地不同程度提高了土壤入渗性能,降低了产流量和产沙量。
[Objective] Effects of rainfall on runoff and sediment in red soil region of Southern China were studied in runoff plots
to provide references for soil and water conservation engineering practice and fundamental research. [Methods] Based on three underlying surfaces (forest
agricultural land
bare land) of runoff plots in Mobu watershed of Yunnan Province
chrono-changes of rainfall
runoff
sediment and infiltration rate were observed from 2013 to 2015. Their relationships were analyzed by means of Mann-Kendall
grey correlation analysis and double cumulative curve
and so on. Meanwhile
effects of rainfall amount on runoff and sediment were studied. [Results] (1) The monthly rainfall during a year showed a fluctuated trend: firstly increased
and then decreased. The rainfall had no significant change among the three years. (2) Under same level of rainfall amount
significant difference in runoff among the three underlying surfac-runoff plots(p<0.05)
they ranked as: forest > agricultural land > bare land. For runoff depth
it had the same rank. (3) Sediment yield had a strong correlation with rainfall and runoff. The correlative coefficients were 0.67~0.82 and 0.69~0.85 respectively. The sediment yield increased with the increase of rainfall intensity. Under similar rainfall scenario
forest had the minimum sediment
while bare land had the largest one. (4) The infiltration rate increased with the growth of rainfall and rainfall intensity in all three runoff plots. The infiltration rate was the biggest in forest with an average infiltration rate of 94.03%; the infiltration rate was the smallest in bare land
its infiltration rate was 86.28%. [Conclusion] As compared with agricultural land and bare land
forest plot increased soil infiltration capacity and reduced the runoff and sediment yield to some extent.
李鹏,李占斌,郑良勇,等.坡面径流侵蚀产沙动力机制比较研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):66-69.
张晶晶,王力.坡面产流产沙影响因素的灰色关联法分析[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(2):159-162.
Piao Shilong, Ciais Philippe, Huang Yao, et al.The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China[J]. Nature, 2010,467(7311):43-51.
张晓明,余新晓,武思宏,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型流域土地利用/土地覆被变化对径流产沙的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2008,29(6):115-122.
Fu Bojie, Chen Liding, Ma Keming, et al. The relationships between landuse and soil conditions in the hilly area of the Loess Plateau in northern Shanxi, China[J]. Catena, 2000,39(1):69-78.
Verstraeten G, van Rompaey A, Poeson J. Evaluating the impact of watershed management scenarios on changes in sediment delivery to rivers:The interactions between sedments and water[J]. Hydrobiology, 2003,494(2):153-158.
Rai S C, Sharma E. Comparative assessment of runoff characteristics under different land use patterns within a Himalayan Watershed[J]. Hydrological Processes, 1998,53(2):2235-2248.
张守红,刘苏峡,莫兴国,等.降雨和水保措施对无定河流域径流和产沙量影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2010,32(4):161-168.
BOOTH D B, KARR J R, Schauman S, et al. Reviving urban streams:Land use, hydrology, biology and human behavior[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2004,40(5):1351-1364.
宋晓猛,张建云,占车生,等.气候变化和人类活动对水文循环影响研究进展[J].水利学报,2013,44(7):779-790.
汪邦稳,肖胜生,张光辉,等.南方红壤区不同利用土地产流产沙特征试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(2):239-243.
符素华,刘宝元,路炳军,等.官厅水库上游水土保持措施的减水减沙效益[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(2):18-23.
陈月红,余新晓,谢崇宝.黄土高原吕二沟流域土地利用及降雨强度对径流泥沙影响初探[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(1):8-12.
刘栋,刘普灵,邓瑞芬,等.不同下垫面径流小区次降雨侵蚀特征相关分析[J].水土保持通报,2011,2(2):99-102.
姜娜,邵明安.黄土高原小流域不同坡地利用方式的水土流失特征[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(6):36-41.
陈伟,魏永霞,王存国,等.不同水土保持技术模式的坡耕地产流、产沙特征[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(6):27-30.
寇馨月,王玉杰,张晓明,等.黄土丘陵第Ⅲ副区典型流域水沙演变过程及其驱动因素分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2015,37(7):85-93.
李洪丽,韩兴,张志丹,等.东北黑土区野外模拟降雨条件下产流产沙研究[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(4):49-52.
张晓明,余新晓,武思宏,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型流域土地利用/土地覆被变化水文动态响应[J].生态学报,2007,27(2):414-423.
王盛萍,张志强,孙阁,等.黄土高原流域土地利用变化水文动态响应:以甘肃天水吕二沟流域为例[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,28(1):48-54.
郑明国,蔡强国,王彩峰,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区坡面水保措施及植被对流域尺度水沙关系的影响[J].水利学报,2007,38(1):47-53.
覃莉,刘凤仙,杨智.喀斯特地区不同坡度径流小区水土流失特征分析[J].中国水土保持,2015,8(08):63-65.
李月,周运超,白晓永,等.径流小区法监测水土流失的百年历程(1915-2014年)[J].中国水土保持,2014(12):63-66.
申震洲,刘普灵,谢永生,等.不同下垫面径流小区土壤水蚀特征试验研究[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(3):6-9.
Lacombe G, McCartney M, Forkuor G. Drying climate in Ghana over the period 1960-2005:Evidence from the resampling-based Mann-Kendall test at local and regional levels[J]. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2012,57(8):1594-1609.
冉大川,刘斌.双累积曲线计算水土保持减水减沙效益方法探讨[J].人民黄河,1996(6):24-25.
林和平,刘丁慧,鲍乃源.灰色相关分析及其应用研究[J].吉林大学学报:信息科学版,2007,25(1):84-90.
赵阳,余新晓.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型流域气候和土地利用变化对径流泥沙产量的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2013,35(3):39-45.
申希平,丁建生,李娟生,等.在SPSS中利用均数和标准差做两独立样本t检验[J].现代预防医学,2007,34(21):4066-4067.
王万忠.黄土地区降雨特性与土壤流失关系的研究[J].水土保持通报,1983,2(4):7-13.
周佩华,豆葆璋,孙清芳,等.降雨能量的试验研究初报[J].水土保持通报,1981,1(1):51-61.
蔡进军,李生宝,蒋齐,等.宁南黄土丘陵区典型水保工程措施对土壤入渗性能的影响[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(1):22-26.
0
浏览量
1210
下载量
8
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621