新疆农业大学 草业与环境科学学院/新疆土壤与植物生态过程实验室,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830052
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
蒋岩初, 张文太, 盛建东. 天山北坡典型小流域侵蚀沟形态特征及其成因[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(1):304-307.
JIANG Yanchu, ZHANG Wentai, SHENG Jiandong. Morphological Characteristics of Erosion Gully and Its Driving Factors in a Typical Small Watershed in Northern Slope of Tianshan Mountains[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(1): 304-307.
蒋岩初, 张文太, 盛建东. 天山北坡典型小流域侵蚀沟形态特征及其成因[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(1):304-307. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.053.
JIANG Yanchu, ZHANG Wentai, SHENG Jiandong. Morphological Characteristics of Erosion Gully and Its Driving Factors in a Typical Small Watershed in Northern Slope of Tianshan Mountains[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(1): 304-307. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.053.
[目的] 揭示天山北坡典型小流域侵蚀沟发育规律,为侵蚀沟的预警及防治提供科学依据。[方法] 选取天山北坡典型小流域10条侵蚀沟进行分析,采用野外实地调查与地理信息技术相结合的方法,对研究区侵蚀沟形态发育特征及其成因进行分析。[结果] (1)研究区侵蚀沟特征值之间存在着一定的相关关系:横截面积与平均沟宽、平均沟深呈极显著正相关;沟壑面积与沟长呈显著正相关;沟壑体积与横截面积、沟壑面积呈极显著正相关关系,与平均沟宽、平均沟深呈显著正相关关系;沟长、平均沟宽、平均沟深相互之间无明显的相关关系,汇水面积与特征值之间也无明显的相关关系。(2)研究区侵蚀沟均是开析型侵蚀沟和弱度割裂型侵蚀沟。(3)研究区侵蚀沟密度与坡度呈正相关关系,坡度越大,密度越大;侵蚀沟密度与沟长无相关关系,侵蚀沟密度随沟长的增加呈先增加后减小的趋势;研究区典型侵蚀沟密度在南坡最大,西坡和西南坡的密度相对较小。[结论] 坡度和坡向是影响小流域尺度侵蚀沟发育的重要地形因素。
[Objective] The objective of this study is to reveal the development of erosion gully in a typical small watershed in the northern slope of Tianshan Mountains
in order to provide a scientific basis for early warning and control of gully erosion. [Methods] This paper selected 10 erosion gullies in the northern slope of Tianshan Mountains
field survey and GIS technology was used to investigate the characteristics and morphological formation of erosion gully. [Results] (1) There was a significantly positive correlation between the cross section area and the average width and the depth of the gully. Gully area was positively related to the length of gully. Significant positive correlations existed between gully volume and cross-sectional area
and between gully volume and gully area. No significant correlations were found among gully length
average width of gully and the mean depth. Similarly
no obvious correlation existed between catchment area and characteristic value. (2) Erosion gullies in the study area were all open-type and weak erosion type. (3) Gully density was positively correlated with the slope
as greater the gully density tended to occur at the steeper slope. However
there was no correlation existed between gully density and gully length. Gully density was the largest in the southern slope
while in the west and southwest slope
the gully density was relatively small. [Conclusion] The slope and aspect are important geomorphological factors influencing gully development at small watershed scale.
岳中琦.香港滑坡灾害防治和社会效益[J].工程地质学报,2006,14(5)12-17.
唐辉明.地质环境与城市发展研究综述[J].工程地质学报,2006,14(6)728-733.
陈国金,陈海洋,陈秋义.巴东城区地质安全问题与防灾体系建设[J].上海地质,2006,9(4):52-57.
田蜜,施炜,李建华,等.江汉盆地西北部断陷带构造变形分析与古应力场演化序列[J].地质学报,2010,84(2):159-170.
向芳,罗来,林良彪,等.重庆—宜昌地区长江阶地和相关沉积研究及其对三峡研究的意义[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2008,36(5):475-479.
夏艳华,白世伟.传递系数法在滑坡治理削坡方案设计中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(S1):3281-3285.
沈尧亮,侯殿英.传递系数法的原型与衍生[J].工程勘察,2010(S1):477-485.
祁小辉,李典庆,周创兵,等.考虑土体空间变异性的边坡最危险滑动面随机分析方法[J].岩土工程学报,2013,35(4):745-753.
朱雷,黄润秋,王小群,等.基于滑带强度参数动态演化的滑坡稳定性研究[J].岩土力学,2015,36(S2):31-438.
任伟中,金亚兵,冯光平,等.滑(边)坡稳定性评估探讨[J].岩土力学,2010,31(7):2129-2134.
刘希林,唐川.泥石流危险性评价[M].北京:科学出版社,1995:1-26,62-66.
刘希林,莫多闻.泥石流风险及沟谷泥石流风险度评价[J].工程地质学报,2002,10(3):266-273.
刘希林.区域泥石流风险评价研究[J].自然灾害学报,2000,9(1):54-61.
颜光辉.成都地区膨胀土力学特性试验研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2013.
0
浏览量
1087
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621