子牙河水系滨岸带植物群落结构及其与环境的关系

梁雪; 何萍; 任颖; 钱金平; 戴霞

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.051

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

子牙河水系滨岸带植物群落结构及其与环境的关系

试验研究

- 子牙河水系滨岸带植物群落结构及其与环境的关系
- Relationship Between Plant Communities and Environment Factors in Riparian Zone Along Ziya River
- 水土保持通报 2017年37卷第1期页码：292-296
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 河北师范大学资源与环境科学学院,河北,石家庄,050024
  2. 中国环境科学研究院国家环境保护区域生态过程与功能评估重点实验室,北京,100012
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项“海河流域河流生态完整性影响机制与恢复途径研究”（2012ZX07203-006）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.051
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
梁雪, 何萍, 任颖, 等. 子牙河水系滨岸带植物群落结构及其与环境的关系[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(1):292-296.

LIANG Xue, HE Ping, REN Ying, et al. Relationship Between Plant Communities and Environment Factors in Riparian Zone Along Ziya River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(1): 292-296.
梁雪, 何萍, 任颖, 等. 子牙河水系滨岸带植物群落结构及其与环境的关系[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(1):292-296. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.051.

LIANG Xue, HE Ping, REN Ying, et al. Relationship Between Plant Communities and Environment Factors in Riparian Zone Along Ziya River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(1): 292-296. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.051.

摘要

[目的

]

以海河流域子牙河水系河流滨岸带植物为对象，研究影响植物群落结构和分布格局的主要环境因子，为相关研究提供依据。[方法

]

2013年6月，在子牙河水系干支流设置了94个滨岸带样地，调查植被结构和海拔、护岸类型、堤外土地利用类型等6个环境因子。[结果

]

子牙河水系滨岸带植物共249种，分属于51科，166属。山区河段滨岸带有199种植物，分属于43科，135属，优势物种有芦苇（

Phragmites australis

）、蒙古蒿（

Artemisia mongolica

）、荆条（

Vitex negundo

）、黄花蒿（

Artemisia annua

）等；平原河段滨岸带有36种植物，分属于22科35属，优势物种主要有芦苇（

P.australis

）、反枝苋（

Amaranthus retroflexus

）等，山区植物丰富度明显高于平原区。[结论

]

海拔高度和堤外土地利用类型与植物群落结构显著相关。水热条件和人类活动压力是影响植被构成的主要成因。

Abstract

[Objective] The study aims to find out factors that influence the plant community structure and distribution pattern in the riparian zone along Ziya river

and provide references for related research. [Methods] In June

2013

we investigated plant community structure and six environmental factors in 94 plots including altitude

levee type and land use type outside the levee in the Ziya river system. [Results] Totally

we found 249 species

which covers 51 families and 166 genera

of which

199 species covering 43 families and 135 genera were found in the mountain regions in the mountainous region and 36 species covering 22 families and 35 genera were found in the plain. Phragmites australis

Artemisia mongolica

Vitex negundo

Artemisia annua were the dominant species in the mountain rivers and P. australis

Amaranthus retroflexus in the plain rivers. The species richness in mountain was significantly higher than that in the plain areas. [Conclusion] The altitude and the land use type outside levee significantly associated with the plant community structure. Hydrothermal conditions and human activities are the main factors affecting the vegetation composition and spatial distribution.

关键词

Keywords

references

王根绪,李元首,吴青柏,等.青藏高原冻土区冻土与植被的关系及其对高寒生态系统的影响[J].中国科学,2006,36(8):743-754.

吴青柏,牛富俊.青藏高原多年冻土变化与工程稳定性[J].科学通报,2013,58(2):115-130.

甘华阳,卓慕宁,李定强,等.广州城市道路雨水径流的水质特征[J].生态环境,2006,15(5):969-973.

荆红卫,张志刚,郭婧.北京北运河水系水质污染特征及污染来源分析[J].中国环境科学,2013,33(2):319-327.

Nielsen D R, Bouma J. Soil Spatial Variability: Proceedings of a Workshop of the ISSS and the SSSA, Las Vegas, Nev., USA, 1984[M]. Vageningen: Pudoc. 1985.

陈莹,赵剑强,胡博.西安市城市主干道路面径流污染特征研究[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(5):781-788.

Gromaire M C, Garnaud S, Saad M, et al. Contribution of different sources to the pollution of wet weather flows in combined sewers[J]. Water Research, 2001,35(2):521-533.

董欣,杜鹏飞,李志一,等.城市降雨屋面、路面径流水文水质特征研究[J].环境科学,2008,29(3):607-612.

Furumai H, Balmer H, Boller M. Dynamic behavior of suspended pollutants and particle size distribution in highway runoff[J]. Water Science Technology, 2002,46(11/12):413-418.

陈莹,赵剑强,胡博.西安市城市主干道路面径流污染及沉淀特性研究[J].环境工程学报,2011,5(2):331-336.

李贺,张雪,高海鹰,等.高速公路路面雨水径流污染特征分析[J].中国环境科学,2008,28(11):1037-1041.

王和意,刘敏,刘巧梅,等.城市暴雨径流初始冲刷效应和径流污染管理[J].水科学进展,2006,17(2):181-185.

Bertrand-Krajewski J L, Chebbo G, Saget A. Distribution of pollutant mass vs volume in stormwater discharges and the first flush phenomenon[J]. Water Research, 1998,32(8):2341-2356.

Saget A, Chebbo G, Bertrand-Krajewski J L. The first flush in sewer systems[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1996,33(9):101-108.

Li Qing, Cheng Qing, Qing Ci, et al. First flush of storm runoff pollution from an urban catchment in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2007,19(3):295-299.

Luo Hongbing, Luo Lin, Huang Gu, et al. Total pollution effect of urban surface runoff[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2009,21(9):1186-1193.

王书敏,郭树刚,何强,等.城市流域降雨径流水质特性及初期冲刷现象[J].环境科学研究,2015,28(4):532-539.

Barrett M E, Irish L B, Malina J F, et al. Characterization of highway runoff in Austin, Texas, area[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1998,124(2):131-137.

Stotz G. Investigations of the properties of the surface water runoff from federal highways in the FRG[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 1999,59:329-337.

Pagotto C, Legret M, Le Cloirec P. Comparison of the hydraulic behaviour and the quality of highway runoff water according to the type of pavement[J]. Water Research, 2000,34(18):4446-4454.

浏览量

1146

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

高寒矿区排土场边坡植被恢复年限对产流产沙的影响

黄延高速公路边坡植被与土壤特性调查研究

宁夏盐池平沙地主要植物群落土壤水分季节动态

宁夏盐池县人工封育区植物群落的β多样性

城市不同植物群落在小尺度范围内降温增湿效应的时空变化