考虑社会及环境效益的再生水投资效率评价

高旭阔; 邓旋

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.044

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

考虑社会及环境效益的再生水投资效率评价

试验研究

- 考虑社会及环境效益的再生水投资效率评价
- Evaluation of Investment Efficiency in Reclaimed Water with Consideration of Social and Environmental Benefits
- 水土保持通报 2017年37卷第1期页码：248-254
- 作者机构：
  
  西安建筑科技大学管理学院,陕西,西安,710055
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家社会科学基金项目“考虑环境成本与收益的再生水项目投资经济分析研究”（15BGL140）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.044
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
高旭阔, 邓旋. 考虑社会及环境效益的再生水投资效率评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(1):248-254.

GAO Xukuo, DENG Xuan. Evaluation of Investment Efficiency in Reclaimed Water with Consideration of Social and Environmental Benefits[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(1): 248-254.
高旭阔, 邓旋. 考虑社会及环境效益的再生水投资效率评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(1):248-254. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.044.

GAO Xukuo, DENG Xuan. Evaluation of Investment Efficiency in Reclaimed Water with Consideration of Social and Environmental Benefits[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(1): 248-254. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.044.

摘要

[目的] 考虑再生水的社会效益和环境效益，与投资相结合，对中国区域再生水的投资效率作出评价，并提出区域差别化的改进策略。[方法] 选取中国的22个省份，4个直辖市和5个自治区（不包括香港、澳门特别行政区和台湾省）为研究对象，运用DEA模型和Malmquist指数模型进行投资效率测算。[结果] 中国再生水投资效率为0.858，各省份效率值参差不齐。中国的再生水投资效率一般，相对于效率前沿存在着一定的改进空间。[结论] 综合考虑了经济、社会和环境效益的再生水投资效率高于仅考虑经济效益的再生水投资效率；区域发展不平衡，各省份的综合效率值相差较大且原因不同。根据不同省份的差异将其划分为不同的类别，并采取相应的技术、管理、政策及综合改进策略。

Abstract

[Objective] The study aims to evaluate the investment efficiency in reclaimed water projects in different regions of China with consideration of social and environmental benefits of the investment

and intend to propose differentiated improvement strategies for different regions. [Methods] This study selected 22 provinces

4 municipalities and 5 autonomous regions(excluding Hongkong

Macao Special Administrative Region and Taiwan Province) as the research objects and used DEA model and Malmquist index model to calculate the investment efficiency. [Results] The investment efficiency in reclaimed water in China was 0.858

and the efficiency was uneven among different provinces. The investment efficiency of reclaimed water in China is normal and it still has room to be improved. Investment efficiency of reclaimed water considering economic

social and environmental benefits is higher than that considering only economic efficiency. [Conclusion] Regional development is unbalanced

the investment efficiency is different among provinces due to different reasons. Therefore

provinces should be divided into different categories and different technology

management

policy and comprehensive improvement strategy should be proposed and carried out.

关键词

Keywords

references

刘洁,谢丽芳,杨国英,等.丰水区城镇化进程与水资源利用的关系[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(3):193-199.

赵良仕,孙才志,郑德凤.中国省际水资源利用效率与空间溢出效应测度[J].地理学报,2014,69(1):121-133.

刘瑜洁,刘俊国,赵旭,等.京津冀水资源脆弱性评价[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(3):211-218.

李俊晓,李朝奎,罗淑华,等.基于AHP—模糊综合评价方法的泉州市水资源可持续利用评价[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(1):210-214.

王震,吴颖超,张娜娜,等.我国粮食主产区农业水资源利用效率评价[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(2):292-296.

张娜娜,王海涛,吴颖超.基于数据包络分析模型的江苏省农业水资源利用效率评价[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(4):299-302.

李燕群,何通国,刘刚,等.城市再生水回用现状及利用前景[J].资源开发与市场,2011,27(12):1096-1100.

倪殷建.环境污染经济损失及污水处理效率的实证研究[J].重庆理工大学学报,2015,29(6):64-68.

刘杰,郑西来,高超,等.城镇污水处理厂用地。运行及建设费用研究[J].环境工程学报,2010,4(11):2522-2526.

Guerrini A, Romano G, Leardini C, et al. Measuring the efficiency of wastewater services through Data Envelopment Analysis[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2015,71(12):1845-1851.

Hernández-Sancho F, Molinos-Senante M, Sala-Garrido R. Energy efficiency in Spanish wastewater treatment plants: A non-radial DEA approach[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2011,409(14):2693-2699.

Molinos-Senante M, Hernández-Sancho F, Sala-Garrido R. Comparing the dynamic performance of wastewater treatment systems: A metafrontier Malmquist productivity index approach[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2015,161:309-316.

Sala-Garrido R, Molinos-Senante M, Hernández-Sancho F. How does seasonality affect water reuse possibilities? An efficiency and cost analysis[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2012,58:125-131.

Urkiaga A, Fuentes D L, Bis B, et al. Development of analysis tools for social, economic and ecological effects of water reuse[J]. Desalination, 2008,218(1):81-91.

熊家晴,华丽芳,王巧,等.再生水生命周期综合价值模型与计算[J].建筑科学,2008,24(10):95-99.

Liang Xiao, van Dijk M P. Cost benefit analysis of centralized wastewater reuse systems[J]. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2012,3(3):1-30.

刘晓君,魏莹军.基于环境会计视角的分散式污水再生利用工程综合评价研究[J].工业安全与环保,2014,40(12):58-61.

李缙荣,张小洪,张航宾,等.污水处理综合系统环境经济效益评估[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(8):2482-2492.

李闻一,钟里卉,祝麟.城镇污水处理项目成本效益分析[J].财会月刊,2015(15):67-70.

Cook W D, Seiford L M. Data envelopment analysis(DEA): Thirty years on[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009,192(1):1-17.

高琴,张辉国,安哲,等.基于DEA分析的乌鲁木齐市污水处理厂规模技术有效性研究[J].新疆大学学报:自然科学版,2006,23(2):211-215.

冯颖,姚顺波,刘东方.基于DEA方法下的河南省污水处理厂财务成本控制研究[J].华东经济管理,2009,23(10):150-154.

马乃毅,徐敏.基于Super-SBM模型的污水厂投资效率实证分析[J].企业经济,2011(1):170-173.

高旭阔.城市再生水资源价值评价研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2010.

浏览量

1061

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

陕北地区退耕还林草工程社会经济效益分析--以志丹县和子洲县为例

基于数据包络分析的溃坝洪水灾害脆弱性评价

干旱区内陆河流域不同规模城镇水资源利用效率评价——以石羊河流域为例

我国粮食主产区农业水资源利用效率评价

西部中小城市再生水项目投资效率研究