西安理工大学 陕西省西北旱区生态水利工程重点实验室,陕西,西安,710048
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
张伟超, 宋策, 郭梦京, 等. 基于MIKE建模的城市生态公园行洪能力分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(1):128-131.
ZHANG Weichao, SONG Ce, GUO Mengjing, et al. Flood Discharging Capacity of Urban Ecological Park Based on MIKE Modeling[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(1): 128-131.
张伟超, 宋策, 郭梦京, 等. 基于MIKE建模的城市生态公园行洪能力分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(1):128-131. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.023.
ZHANG Weichao, SONG Ce, GUO Mengjing, et al. Flood Discharging Capacity of Urban Ecological Park Based on MIKE Modeling[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(1): 128-131. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.023.
[目的] 预测并分析工程对河道行洪能力变化的影响,为城市生态公园工程防洪影响评价提供研究技术方法。[方法] 基于MIKE 21建立城市生态公园工程河段的平面二维水流数学模型,以渭河宝鸡段为例,选取1954型洪水过程验证模型合理性,模拟3种典型流量下河道流场和水位的变化特征,讨论城市生态公园修建后对河道行洪能力的安全影响。[结果] 3种典型流量洪水下沿线水位均低于堤顶高程,对城市行洪安全不构成威胁,因此行洪安全可以保证。但由于河道行洪宽度变窄左岸流速增大,加剧了对岸堤的冲刷,采取岸堤加固措施是极为必要的。[结论] 河道形状的改变会影响水的流态,水流速度过大会影响河堤结构稳定性,最终影响河道的行洪能力。
[Objective] The study aims to predict and analyze the project impacts on the river flood discharging capacity
and provide methods for assessing flood controlling impacts of urban ecological park projects.[Methods] Based on MIKE 21
we constructed a 2-dimension water flow model for urban ecological park section in Weihe River in Baoji City
selected 1954 flooding process to verify the rationality of the model
and simulated three typical flow characteristics of flow field and changes in water level and discuss the urban ecological park impacts on river flood discharging capacity. [Results] Under the three typical flow flooding events
the water level along the river was below embankment and not a threat to urban flood discharging safety
and the flooding safety can be guaranteed. But as a result of flooding passage narrowing and increasing velocity
the erosion of the embankment was intensified
and reinforcement measures was urgently needed. [Conclusion] The river shape will affect the flow regime. The higher water flow speed will affect the stability of embankment structure thus influencing the river flood discharging capacity.
Duan N, Liu X D, Dai J, et al. Evaluating the environmental impacts of an urban wetland park based on emergy accounting and life cycle assessment: A case study in Beijing[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2011,222(2):351-359.
Li Yufeng, Liu Hongyu, Zheng Nan, et al. Analysis of trophic status and its influence factors of different water body types in Xixi National Wetland Park, China[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2010(2):768-780.
Li Xiaoping, Chen Manman, Anderson B C. Design and performance of a water quality treatment wetland in a public park in Shanghai, China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2009,35(1):18-24.
Johnston J. Nature Areas For City People[M]. London: Ecology Unit, 1990.
邓毅.城市生态公园的发展及其概念之探讨[J].中国园林,2003,19(12):51-53.
唐铭.西北地区城市生态公园评价体系研究:以兰州银滩生态公园为例[J].山东农业大学学报:自然科学版,2010,41(1):80-86.
宋策,谭奇林.水电工程干扰下饮用水水源地的水质风险评估[J].长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(1):59-65.
刘冀,李伟,张弛,等.碧流河水库下游河道行洪能力及洪水淹没模拟[J].中国农村水利水电,2008(2):22-25.
王庆改,戴文楠,赵晓宏,等.基于Mike21 FM的来宾电厂扩建工程温排水数值模拟研究[J].环境科学研究,2009,22(3):332-336.
李大鸣,管永宽,李玲玲,等.蓄滞洪区洪水演进数学模型研究及应用[J].水利水运工程学报,2011(3):27-35.
李大鸣,林毅,徐亚男,等.河道、滞洪区洪水演进数学模型[J].天津大学学报:自然科学与工程技术版,2009,42(1):47-55.
Savage B M, Johnson M C. Flow over ogee spillway: Physical and numerical model case study[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2001,127(8): 640-649.
何杰,辛文杰.含有紊动黏性项浅水方程的数值求解[J].水利水运工程学报,2010(3):95-100.
高庆先,胡铭,杨新兴,等,湖泊流体动力学模型及其应用[J].环境科学研究,2001,14(6):29-32.
0
浏览量
1088
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621