1. 南阳理工学院,河南,南阳,473004
2. 中国科学院 成都山地灾害与环境研究所,四川,成都,610041
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
季宪军, 梁瑛, 潘华利, 等. 泥浆对黏性碎屑流坡面运移过程的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(1):88-92.
JI Xianjun, LIANG Ying, PAN Huali, et al. Influence of Mud on Migration Process of Viscous Debris Flow[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(1): 88-92.
季宪军, 梁瑛, 潘华利, 等. 泥浆对黏性碎屑流坡面运移过程的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(1):88-92. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.016.
JI Xianjun, LIANG Ying, PAN Huali, et al. Influence of Mud on Migration Process of Viscous Debris Flow[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(1): 88-92. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.016.
[目的
]
分析泥浆对黏性碎屑流坡面运动形态、横向宽度、纵向运动距离及运动速度影响,为此类灾害防治提供参考。[方法
]
制作黏性碎屑流实验模型,将不同含水率成都黏土泥浆与粗颗粒混合,制备黏性碎屑流试样,开展系列黏性碎屑流物理模型试验。[结果
]
随泥浆密度增大,粗颗粒间粘连作用增强,其运动形态由无黏碎屑流向黏性碎屑流再到整体块状运动形态转变;坡面横向宽度、纵向运移距离和速度随泥浆密度增加而减小;不同密度泥浆组成黏性碎屑流运动过程具有分类现象:密度低于1.413 g/cm
3
时,速度随时间增长快,变化梯度较稳定;密度大于1.413 g/cm
3
时,运动速度变化过程可分为2个阶段:前期速度随时间增长慢,变化梯度较小;后期速度随时间增长快,且较前阶段变化梯度有所增大,各高密度泥浆情况趋于一致。[结论
]
泥浆影响黏性碎屑流运移形态和运动过程。
[Objective] The aim of the study is to analyze the influence of mud on the moving ways
width and longitudinal distance and velocity of viscous debris flow on slope
and help to provide the references for disaster prevention. [Methods] The experimental model was built for viscous debris flow
and a series of model experiments were carried out through the device. The viscous debris flow composed of Chengdu clay mud and coarse particles. [Results] The adhesion force between the coarse particles increased
and the movement patterns changed from the inviscid debris flow to the viscous debris flow
and to the massive sliding with increasing mud density. The width and distance on slope decreased with increasing mud density. The migration process could be differentiated according to mud density. The velocity increases rapidly and the gradient is large when mud density was lower than 1.413 g/cm3. The migration process can be divided into two stages when mud density was higher than 1.413 g/cm3
the velocity increased slowly and the gradient changes little in the first stage but the velocity increased quickly
and the gradient changed quickly in the second stage. [Conclusion] The mud affects the movement pattern and the moving process of viscous debris flow.
许强,黄润秋,殷跃平,等.2009年6·5重庆武隆鸡尾山崩滑灾害基本特征与成因机理初步研究[J].工程地质学报,2009,17(4):433-444.
谢洪,王成华,林立相.标水岩沟滑坡型泥石流灾害及特征[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2000,11(3):23-25,30.
季宪军,欧国强,杨顺,等.崩滑土体坡面运动过程研究现状与展望[J].山地学报,2012,30(3):361-368.
胡厚田,刘涌江,邢爱国.高速远程滑坡流体动力学理论的研究[M].成都:西南交通大学出版社,2003.
刘涌江.大型高速岩质滑坡流体化理论研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2002.
Savage S B, Hutter K. The dynamics of avalanches of granular materials from initiation to runout(Part I): Analysis[J]. Acta Mechanica, 1991,86(1/2/3/4):201-223.
Pastor M, Merodo J A F, Herreros M I, et al. Mathematical, constitutive and numerical modelling of catastrophic landslides and related phenomena[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2008,41(1):85-132.
王涛,盛谦,熊将.基于颗粒流方法自然崩落法数值模拟研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(S2):4202-4207.
郑智能,张永兴,董强,等.边坡落石灾害的颗粒流模拟方法[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2008,19(3):46-49.
梁鑫,郑立宁.土石碎屑体稳定性离散元数值分析[J].铁道建筑, 2011(2):91-93.
左自波,张璐璐,王建华.降雨触发不同级配堆积体滑坡模型试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2015,37(7):1319-1327.
周中,傅鹤林,刘宝琛,等.土石混合体边坡人工降雨模拟试验研究[J].岩土力学,2007,28(7):1391-1396.
刘波,罗先启,张振华.三峡库区千将坪滑坡模型试验研究[J].三峡大学学报:自然科学版,2007,29(2):124-128.
吴火珍,冯美果,焦玉勇,等.降雨条件下堆积层滑坡体滑动机制分析[J].岩土力学,2010,31(S1):324-329.
李焕强,孙红月,孙新民,等.降雨入渗对边坡性状影响的模型试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2009,31(4):589-594.
尹洪江,王志兵,胡明鉴.降雨强度对松散堆积土斜坡破坏的模型试验研究[J].土工基础,2011,25(3):74-76.
0
浏览量
1181
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621