西安市汽车站地表灰尘中重金属的污染评价及其来源识别

田东凡; 卢新卫; 景一鸣; 张蒙; 罗润

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.006

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

西安市汽车站地表灰尘中重金属的污染评价及其来源识别

试验研究

- 西安市汽车站地表灰尘中重金属的污染评价及其来源识别
- Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution and Source Identification in Surface Dust at Urban Coach Stations in Xi'an City
- 水土保持通报 2017年37卷第1期页码：34-39
- 作者机构：
  
  陕西师范大学旅游与环境学院,陕西,西安,710119
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“冶炼焦电工业区重金属与PAHs污染特征及人群健康风险研究”（41271510）;大学生创新创业训练计划项目（cx15041）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.006
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
田东凡, 卢新卫, 景一鸣, 等. 西安市汽车站地表灰尘中重金属的污染评价及其来源识别[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(1):34-39.

TIAN Dongfan, LU Xinwei, JING Yiming, et al. Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution and Source Identification in Surface Dust at Urban Coach Stations in Xi'an City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(1): 34-39.
田东凡, 卢新卫, 景一鸣, 等. 西安市汽车站地表灰尘中重金属的污染评价及其来源识别[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(1):34-39. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.006.

TIAN Dongfan, LU Xinwei, JING Yiming, et al. Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution and Source Identification in Surface Dust at Urban Coach Stations in Xi'an City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(1): 34-39. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.006.

摘要

[目的] 研究西安市长途汽车站地表灰尘中重金属的主要成分、可能来源及其污染水平，为改善汽车站内及周边环境现状提供科学依据。[方法] 利用X-Ray荧光光谱仪对西安市内20个具有代表性的汽车站地表灰尘中Cu，Mn，Ni，Pb，V和Zn的元素含量进行分析，采用地积累指数法及潜在生态风险指数法评价灰尘重金属的污染水平及环境风险，利用主成分分析。聚类分析等方法来研究城市汽车站地表灰尘中重金属的主要成分及其可能来源。[结果] Cu，Pb，Zn均在不同程度上超过陕西省土壤背景值，其含量的平均值分别为36.3，107.7，113.5 mg/kg。地积累指数法评价表明，除Pb为中度污染以外，其余元素均为无污染；潜在生态风险指数法表明，西安汽车站地表灰尘中的重金属元素处于中等污染水平，具有中等潜在生态风险。[结论] Cu，Mn和Ni主要来自于自然源和交通源，Pb和Zn主要来自汽车尾气的排放及零部件的磨损，V则主要来自于自然源。

Abstract

[Objective] The objective of the study is to investigate heavy metal pollution and possible sources of heavy metals in surface dust in coach stations of Xi'an City

in order to provide support for improving the environment in coach stations of Xi'an City. [Methods] Dust samples were collected from 20 representative coach stations in Xi'an City and the concentrations of Cu

and Zn were measured by X-Ray fluorescence spectroscopy. Pollution level and environmental risk of heavy metals in the dust were assessed using the geo-accumulation pollution index and the potentially ecological risk index

respectively. Correlation coefficient analysis

principal component analysis and cluster analysis were used to identify the possible sources of these heavy metals. [Results] The mean content of Cu

Pb and Zn in the dust was 36.3

107.7 and 113.5 mg/kg

respectively

which were significantly higher than their background values in soil in Shaanxi. The geo-accumulation index results indicated that the pollution level of Pb was medium

while other heavy metal pollution belonged to low-level. The potentially ecological risk index showed that the surface dust from coach stations was moderately polluted

and have medium ecological risk. [Conclusion] Source identification results suggest that Cu

Mn and Ni in the surface dust mainly came from nature and traffic

Pb and Zn mainly came from automobile exhaust emissions and worn-out parts

and V mainly came from the nature.

关键词

Keywords

references

朱礼学.城市尘土地球化学调查的意义及构想[J].四川地质学报,2003,23(3):174-175.

Xie Shanju,Dearing J A,Boyle J F, et al. Association between magnetic properties and element concentrations of Liverpool street dust and its implications [J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2001,48(2):83-92.

Akther M S, Madany I M. Heavy metals in street and house dust in Bahrain [J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1993, 66(1):111-119.

向丽,李迎霞,史江红,等.北京城区道路灰尘重金属和多环芳烃污染状况探析[J].环境科学,2010,31(1):159-167.

Loganathan P, Vigneswaran S, Kandasamy J. Road-deposited sediment pollutants: A critical review of their characteristics, source apportionment, and management[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2013,43(13):1315-1348.

Jordanova D, Jordanova N, Petrov P. Magnetic susceptibility of road deposited sediments at a national scale-relation to population size and urban pollution[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2014,189(12):239-251.

Day J P, Hart M, Robinson M S. Lead in urban street dust[J].Nature, 1975,253(31):243-245.

Stigliani W M, Doelman P, Salomons W, et al. Chemical time bombs-predicting the unpredictable [J]. Environment, 1991,33(4):4-30.

李小飞,陈志彪,张永贺,等.福州市公交枢纽站地表灰尘重金属含量。来源及其健康风险评价[J].环境科学研究,2013,26(8):906-912.

韩秀凤,卢新卫,庞龙,等.包头市街道灰尘重金属空间分布及生态风险[J].干旱区地理,2014,37(3):561-569.

刘德鸿,王发园,周文利,等.洛阳市不同功能区道路灰尘重金属污染及潜在生态风险[J].环境科学,2012,33(1):253-259.

王利军,卢新卫,荆淇,等.宝鸡长青镇铅锌冶炼厂周边土壤重金属污染研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2012,3(2):325-330.

黄丽,卢新卫,翟萌,等.西安城市公园灰尘重金属污染及其风险评价[J].城市环境与城市生态.2010,23(1):17-20.

Müller G. Index of geoaccumulation in sediments of the Rhine River [J]. Geojournal, 1969, 2(3):108-118.

国家环境保护局,中国环境监测总站.中国土壤元素背景值[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1990:87-90;330-497.

张菊,邓焕光,陈振楼,等.上海市区街道灰尘重金属污染研究[J].土壤通报,2007,38(4):727-731.

王利军,卢新卫,雷凯.宝鸡市街尘重金属元素含量及其环境风险评价[J].土壤通报,2012,43(1):200-205.

陈秀端,卢新卫,赵彩凤,等.西安市二环内表层土壤重金属空间分布特征[J].地理学报,2011,66(9):1281-1288.

章明奎.浙江省汽车站地表灰尘中重金属含量及其来源研究[J].环境科学学报,2010,30(11):2294-2303.

Preciado H F, Li L Y, Evaluation of metal loadings and bioavailability in air, water and soil along two highways of British Columbia, Canada[J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2006, 172(1/2/3/4):81-108.

陈青林,王惠,杨宝山,等.济南市地表灰尘重金属含量及其污染评价[J].济南大学学报:自然科学版,2013,27(4):428-432.

Gunawardana C, Goonetilleke A, Egodawatta P, et al. Source characterization of road dust based on chemical and mineralogical composition[J].Chemosphere, 2012,87(2):163-170.

Amato F, Schaap M, Hugo A C, et al. Short-term variability of mineral dust, metals and carbon emission from road dust resuspension[J]. Environment, 2013, 74(2):134-140.

李海燕,石安邦.城市地表颗粒物重金属分布特征及其影响因素分析[J].生态环境学报,2014,23(11):1852-1860.

Pandian S, Gokhale S, Ghoshal A K. Evaluating effects of traffic and vehicle characteristics on vehicular emissions near traffic intersections[J]. Transportation Research(Part D): Transport and Environment, 2009,14(3):180-196.

浏览量

1146

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

蚌埠市地表灰尘重金属污染特征及潜在生态风险

渭河(咸阳段)表层沉积物中重金属形态分布特征

土壤环境污染与农产品质量

湖南湘潭市土壤重金属污染调查与评价

南昌市城市污泥重金属形态分布及其生物活性研究