天津市临港城市湿地植物群落特征及多样性

万媛媛; 李洪远; 莫训强; 吕铃钥; 鲍海泳; 杨佳楠

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.06.055

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

天津市临港城市湿地植物群落特征及多样性

试验研究

- 天津市临港城市湿地植物群落特征及多样性
- Plant Community Characteristics and Diversity of Urban Wetland at Lingany District of Tianjin City
- 水土保持通报 2016年36卷第6期页码：326-332
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 南开大学环境科学与工程学院,天津,300350
  2. 天津师范大学城市与环境科学学院,天津,300387
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金青年项目“双向演替下消落带湿地碳汇波动机制及其影响因素”（41301096）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.06.055
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2016
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
万媛媛, 李洪远, 莫训强, 等. 天津市临港城市湿地植物群落特征及多样性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(6):326-332.

Plant Community Characteristics and Diversity of Urban Wetland at Lingany District of Tianjin City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(6): 326-332.
万媛媛, 李洪远, 莫训强, 等. 天津市临港城市湿地植物群落特征及多样性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(6):326-332. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.06.055.

Plant Community Characteristics and Diversity of Urban Wetland at Lingany District of Tianjin City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(6): 326-332. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.06.055.

摘要

[目的] 探究城市湿地植被恢复的群落特征及物种多样性格局，为城市湿地保护和恢复策略的制订提供科学依据。[方法] 采用样方法对天津临港恢复湿地的植物群落进行调查，计算群落植物种重要值，并利用组平均法聚类，分析物种多样性格局。[结果] （1）乔灌草各层主要优势物种分别为国槐（Sophora japonica）、刺槐（Robinia pseudocaacia）；柽柳（Tamarix chinensis）和芦苇（Phragmites australis），灌木层中的柽柳重要值最大。（2）植被划分为4组、17个群丛类型，过渡区广布种斑块频度最大（32.7%），以国槐+银杏群落（Sophora japonica+Ginkgo biloba）为主；滨水湿地斑块群落频度最小（17.3%），以柽柳-芦苇群落（Tamarix chinensis-Phragmites australis）为主。（3） Shannon-Wiener指数与Simpson指数总体变化趋势较一致，最高值均出现在金叶榆-紫穗槐（Ulmus pumila-Amorpha fruticosa）群落；Pielou均匀度指数≥0.8的样方占样方总数的53.8%；近水绿地斑块丰富度指数强度较大，物种复杂度高。（4）调查中发现有刺槐、旱柳（Salix matsudana）、火炬树（Rhust yphina）等乔木更新苗出现，出现明显的群落演替和自然更新现象。[结论] 研究区植物种类丰富，近水绿地斑块物种多样性较高，但湿生植物群落总体优势不明显。

Abstract

[Objective] The plant community characteristics and species diversity patterns in restored urban wetland were researched to provide scientific basis for urban wetland protection and restoration strategies of vegetation.[Methods] Plant community of restored urban wetland at Lingany District of Tianjin City was investigated using quadrat sampling method. Species diversity-patterns was analyzed through group average clustering with data of important values.[Results] (1) The community's dominant species of tree layer

shrub layer layer and herb layer were Sophora japonica and Robinia pseudoacacia

Tamarix chinensis

and Phragmites communis. In shrub layer

Tamarix chinensis had the maximum important value. (2) Vegetation was divided into 4 groups

17 cluster types. Widespread species in the transitional area owned the biggest frequency(32.7%); Sophora japonica+ginkgo community accounted for the largest proportion; Tamarix chinensis-Phragmitesaustralis community accounted for the largest proportion in waterfront wetland patch which had the smallest frequency(17.3%). (3) The overall change trend of Shannon-Wiener diversity and Simpon diversity was consistent. The highest value appeared in Ulmus pumila-Amorpha fruticosa community. The ratio of≥0.8 Pielu evenness accounted for 53.8% of the total sample plots

and species richness of water-around green patches showed greater intensity. (4) Robinia pseudoacacia

Salix matsudana and Rhus typhina seedlings were found

which meaning community succession and natural regeneration emerged.[Conclusion] Plant species is very abundant in overall research area

water around green patches own high species diversity and the dominance of hygrophyte community is not obvious.

关键词

Keywords

references

谈明洪,李秀彬,吕昌河.20世纪90年代中国大中城市建设用地扩张及其对耕地的占用[J].中国科学(D):地球科学,2004,34(12):1157-1165.

Churkina G. Modeling the carbon cycle of urban systems[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2008,216(2):107-113.

Jo H K, McPherson G E. Carbon Storage and flux in urban residential greenspace[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 1995,45(2):109-133.

Pouyat R V, Effland W R. The investigation and classification of humanly modified soils in the Baltimore ecosystem study[C]//Kimble J M, Ahrens R J,&Bryant R B, Eds. Classification, Correlation, and Management of Anthropogenic Soils. Lincoln, NE:USDA-NRCS, National Soil Survey Center, Nevada and Califormia,1999:141-154.

Jo H J. Impacts of urban greenspace on offsetting carbon emissions for middle Korea[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2002,64(2):115-126.

Pouyat R V, Yesilonis I D, Nowak D J. Carbon storage by urban soils in the United States[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2006,35(4):1566-1575.

Churkina G, Brown D G, Keoleian G. Carbon stored in human settlements:The conterminous united states[J]. Global Change Biology, 2010,16(1):135-143.

章明奎,周翠.杭州市城市土壤有机碳的积累和特性[J].土壤通报,2006,37(1):19-21.

史利江,郑丽波,梅雪英,等.上海市不同土地利用方式下的土壤碳氮特征[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(9):2279-2287.

谢双玉,王亚玲,黄涛,等.武汉市主城区土地利用/覆被变化及其对土壤有机碳储量的影响[J].华中师范大学学报,2014,48(3):442-447.

孙艳丽,马建华,李灿,等.开封市不同功能区城市土壤有机碳含量与密度分析[J].地理科学,2009,29(1):124-128.

罗上华,毛齐正,马克明,等.北京城市绿地表层土壤碳氮分布特征[J].生态学报,2014,34(20):6011-6019.

何跃,张甘霖.城市土壤有机碳和黑碳的含量特征与来源分析[J].土壤学报,2006,43(2):177-181.

邱敏.福州市不同功能区土壤有机碳和黑碳的对比研究[D].福建福州:福建师范大学,2009.

王秋兵,段迎秋,魏忠义,等.沈阳市城市土壤有机碳空间变异特征研究[J].土壤通报,2009,40(2):252-257.

罗上华,毛齐正,马克明,等.城市土壤碳循环与碳固持研究综述[J].生态学报,2012,32(22):7177-7188.

陕西省土壤普查办公室.陕西土壤[M].北京:科学出版社,1992:91-110.

石辉.城市环境学[M].陕西西安:陕西科学技术出版社,2010:95-111.

浏览量

936

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

天津地区湿地退化特征与驱动因素的多变量相关分析

高寒矿区排土场边坡植被恢复年限对产流产沙的影响

砒砂岩区4种人工林林下草本植物多样性与土壤理化性质

喀斯特石漠化生态治理区结构与物种多样性研究

天津城市用地时空扩展研究