不同生计方式农户生活能源消费行为及其影响因素

张敬飒; 吴文恒; 朱虹颖; 孙锦锦

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.06.044

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同生计方式农户生活能源消费行为及其影响因素

试验研究

- 不同生计方式农户生活能源消费行为及其影响因素
- Consumer Behavior of Rural Household Energy and Its Influential Factors Based on Different Livelihood Models
- 水土保持通报 2016年36卷第6期页码：265-271
- 作者机构：
  
  西北大学城市与环境学院,陕西,西安,710127
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“多元化利用方式下的农村生活能源消费行为与区域模式研究”（4101555）;陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目（2015M439）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.06.044
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2016
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张敬飒, 吴文恒, 朱虹颖, 等. 不同生计方式农户生活能源消费行为及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(6):265-271.

ZHANG Jingsa, WU Wenheng, ZHU Hongying, et al. Consumer Behavior of Rural Household Energy and Its Influential Factors Based on Different Livelihood Models[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(6): 265-271.
张敬飒, 吴文恒, 朱虹颖, 等. 不同生计方式农户生活能源消费行为及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(6):265-271. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.06.044.

ZHANG Jingsa, WU Wenheng, ZHU Hongying, et al. Consumer Behavior of Rural Household Energy and Its Influential Factors Based on Different Livelihood Models[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(6): 265-271. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.06.044.

摘要

[目的] 分析不同生计方式下农户生活能源消费行为及其影响因素，为区域制定能源利用与环境保护规划及政策提供参考。[方法] 基于西安市城郊地区381份调查问卷，采用优势能源系数法与Tobit模型开展研究。[结果] （1）纯农户主要使用秸秆、玉米芯、薪柴等生物质能源，经济性、可获性优先；兼业户生物质能、液化气和太阳能使用突出，可获性与便捷性兼顾，呈现互补性消费；非农户优势能源为煤及其制品、电能、太阳能等商品能源，便捷性、清洁性与高效性优先。（2）可获得性是影响纯农户生物质能消费的关键因素，主要体现在作物种植面积的多少，人均收入提高会减少其消耗；非农户生物质资源缺乏，煤及其制品、电能为主要生活用能，常住人口越多，煤炭、电能消费量越大，人均收入、家庭有效最高受教育程度对电能消费正向影响；兼业户液化气、太阳能消费受家庭规模与人均收入影响明显。[结论] 农户生活能源消费行为受家庭特征、人均收入、能源可获得性等方面影响，纯农、兼业、非农3种生计方式伴随收入水平提高以及商品化、高质化用能的演替过程，呈现了生活用能的阶梯提高。城郊农户大量使用排放系数较高的煤及其制品，不利于城市地区环境改善，应重视这类群体的用能导向和管理。

Abstract

[Objective] Consumer behavior of rural household energy and its influencing factors of different livelihood models were analyzed

which can provide reference for the development of energy utilization and environmental protection planning and policy.[Methods] 381 survey questionnaires in suburban area of Xi'an City were collected. Dominant energy coefficient method and the Tobit model method were used.[Results] Consumer behavior of rural household energy is influenced by livelihood model. Biomass energy such as straw

corncob and firewood are mainly used by the pure agricultural households

in which economy and availability of energy consumption are concerned firstly; coal and its products

electricity

solar energy and other commercial energy are prominent in the non-agricultural households

where the convenience

clean and high efficiency of energy use are preferred; as for households with combined occupations

the advantageous energies as biomass energy

liquefied petroleum gas and solar energy were preferred from the view of availability and convenience. The key factors affecting biomass energy consumption is the availability of energy. This is mainly reflected by the planted area

but per capita income increase will reduce biomass energy consumption. The non-agricultural households of the suburbs are lack of the biomass energy

coal and its products and electrical energy are the dominant household energy. The more resident population. the larger consumption. At the same time

the per capita income

and the effective family highest education level have the positive influence on the electrical energy consumption. Liquefied petroleum gas and solar energy consumption of households with combined occupations is mainly affected by family size and per capita income.[Conclusion] Consumer behavior of rural household energy is affected by family characteristics

per capita income

energy availability

and so on. With the increase of income level

and development of energy commercialization and the quality

all of the three livelihoods presented an improved energy use step by step. Around city center

coal and its products with high emission coefficient are not encouraged to use frequently. And that's not conducive to improve the environment of urban region

so attention should be paid to the energy consumption orientation of these groups.

关键词

Keywords

references

Song Malin, Wang Shuhong, Yu Huayin, et al. To reduce energy consumption and to maintain rapid economic growth:Analysis of the condition in China based on expended IPAT model[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011,15(9):5129-5134.

宋佩珊,计军平,马晓明.广东省能源消费碳排放增长的结构分解分析[J].资源科学,2012,34(3):551-558.

Davis S J, Caldeira K, Matthews H D. Future CO

emissions and climate change from existing energy infrastructure[J]. Science, 2010,329(5997):1330-1333.

Peters G P, Weber C L, Guan D, et al. China's growing CO

emissions:A race between increasing consumption and efficiency gains[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007,41(17):5939-5944.

Jiang Yong. China's water scarcity[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009,90(11):3185-3196.

檀菲菲,张萌,李浩然,等.基于集对分析的京津冀区域可持续发展协调能力评价[J].生态学报,2014,34(11):3090-3098.

Tan Zongfu, Li Li, Wang Jianjun, et al. Examining the driving forces for improving China's CO

emission intensity using the decomposing method[J]. Applied Energy, 2011,88(12):4496-4504.

张旺,周跃云.基于结构分解法的北京市能源碳排放增量分析[J].资源科学,2013,35(2):275-283.

Acaravci A, Ozturk I. On the relationship between energy consumption, CO

emissions and economic growth in Europe[J]. Energy, 2010,35(12):5412-5420.

Wang Ping, Wu Wanshui, Zhu Bangzhu, et al. Examining the impact factors of energy-related CO

emissions using the STIRPAT model in Guangdong Province, China[J]. Applied Energy, 2013,106(11):65-71.

Ozturk I, Acaravci A. CO

emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010,14(9):3220-3225.

Wang Shaojian, Fang Chuanglin, Guan Xinliang, et al. Urbanisation, energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions in China:A panel data analysis of China's provinces[J]. Applied Energy, 2014,136(S):738-749.

Zhang Zhuoying, Shi Minjun, Yang Hong. Understanding Beijing's water challenge:A decomposition analysis of changes in Beijing's water footprint between 1997 and 2007[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012,46(22):12373、12380.

Zhao Chunfu, Chen Bin. Driving force analysis of the agricultural water footprint in China based on the LMDI method[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014,48(21):12723-12731.

张陈俊,章恒全,龚雅云.中国结构升级,技术进步与水资源消耗:基于改进的LMDI方法[J].资源科学,2014,36(10):1993-2002.

Minx J C, Baiocchi G, Peters G P, et al. A "carbonizing dragon":China's fast growing CO

emissions revisited[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011,45(21):9144-9153.

宋杰鲲.基于LMDI的山东省能源消费碳排放因素分解[J].资源科学,2012,34(1):35-41.

Ang B W. The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis:A practical guide[J]. Energy Policy, 2005,33(7):867-871.

Ang B W.Decomposition analysis for policymaking in nergy:Which is the preferred method[J]. Energy Policy, 2004,32(9):1131-1139.

Li Li, Chen Chenhong, Xie Shichen, et al. Energy demand and carbon emissions under different development scenarios for Shanghai, China[J]. Energy Policy, 2010,38(9):4797-807.

Yue Ting, Long Ruyin, Chen Hong, et al. The optimal CO

emissions reduction path in Jiangsu Province:An expanded IPAT approach[J]. Applied Energy, 2013,112(4):1510-1517.

岳书敬,许耀,胡姚雨.长三角地区行业间水资源消耗差异性分析[J].资源科学,2014,36(10):2003-2011.

浏览量

1030

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于Tobit模型的农户层次农业土地用途变更分析

中国干旱区农户气候变化感知及适应性行为研究

土地用途管制框架下农户土地利用行为特征及影响因素——四川省成都市和湖北省武汉市2个典型区域的比较

三峡库区农户水土保持行为类型及其机理

川黔地区绿色发展与乡村振兴协调关系及影响因素