1. 中国科学院 水利部 成都山地灾害与环境研究所 山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室,四川,成都,610041
2. 四川师范大学 地理与资源科学学院,四川,成都,610101
3. 四川农业大学 水利水电学院,四川,雅安,625014
4. 攀枝花市干沟水利水保综合试验场,四川,攀枝花,617000
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
杨超, 苏正安, 马菁, 等. 基于无人机影像快速估算矿山排土场边坡土壤侵蚀速率的方法[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(6):126-130.
YANG Chao, SU Zhengan, MA Jing, et al. Method of Soil Erosion Rate Estimation on Mineland Dump Slope Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Image[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(6): 126-130.
杨超, 苏正安, 马菁, 等. 基于无人机影像快速估算矿山排土场边坡土壤侵蚀速率的方法[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(6):126-130. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.06.021.
YANG Chao, SU Zhengan, MA Jing, et al. Method of Soil Erosion Rate Estimation on Mineland Dump Slope Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Image[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(6): 126-130. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.06.021.
[目的
]
探究无人机高清影像快速估算矿山排土场边坡土壤侵蚀速率的方法,为无长期地形监测地区的土壤侵蚀强度估算提供了新方法。[方法
]
通过无人机和RTK-GPS分别获取研究区影像及地面控制点坐标,利用Agisoft PhotoScan Professional 1.1.2软件生成研究区空间点云,利用ArcGIS 10.3生成高精度DEM,通过目视遥感解译和现场调查,快速估算研究区土壤侵蚀速率。[结果
]
本研究区排土场边坡土壤流失面积11 052.53 m
2
,土壤侵蚀总体积835.41 m
3
,土壤侵蚀速率为4 043.82 t/(km
2
·a)。使用普通克里金法插值生成DEM数据精度为0.26 m。[结论
]
通过本研究方法计算出的排土场土壤侵蚀强度属于中度侵蚀,土壤侵蚀速率较为符合实际情况,精度也满足了本研究的需要,同时,在高密度点存在的情况下,各种插值方法生成DEM数据误差相差不大,使用普通克里金法能够使结果最优。
[Objective] Soil erosion rate of mineland dump slope was estimated using high resolution image of unmanned aerial vehicle(UAV) which provided a new method to estimate the soil erosion rate in the area without long-term topography monitoring.[Methods] The images of study area and spatial coordinates of the ground control points were acquired using UAV and RTK-GPS
respectively. The dense point clouds and high resolution digital elevation models(DEMs) were generated using Agisoft PhotoScan Professional 1.1.2 and Arc GIS 10.3
respectively. Upon which
the soil erosion rate was estimated by visual imagery interpretation and field survey.[Results] The soil erosion area and soil erosion volume in the mineland dump slope were estimated at 11 052.53 m2 and 835.41 m3
respectively. The soil erosion rate was estimated at 4 043.82 t/(km2·a). The RMSE of the DEM was 0.26 m using Ordinary Kriging method.[Conclusion] The soil erosion rate of the study area belonged to middle soil erosion
which were thought consisted with factual situations. And hence
the precision of DEM satisfied the request of the study. Although no significant differences in the DEM accuracy could be found among various interpolation methods due to the high density of cloud data
Ordinary Kriging performed best among different interpolation methods.
张发旺,侯新伟,韩占涛,等.采煤塌陷对土壤质量的影响效应及保护技术[J].地理与地理信息科学,2003,19(3):67-70.
Wu Quanyuan, Pang Jiewu, Qi Shanzhong, et al. Impacts of coal mining subsidence on the surface landscape in Longkou City, Shandong Province of China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2009,59(4):783-791.
张平仓,王文龙,唐克丽,等.神府-东胜矿区采煤塌陷及其对环境影响初探[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(4):35-44.
李连娟,榆神矿区矿山开发对水环境的影响及防治措施探讨[J].中国煤炭地质,2005, 17(5):47-49.
侯新伟,张发旺,韩占涛,等.神府-东胜矿区生态环境脆弱性成因分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(3):54-57.
侯庆春,汪有科,杨光.神府-东胜煤田开发区建设对植被影响的调查[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(4):127-137.
王兵,崔向慧,白秀兰,等.荒漠化地区土壤水分时空格局及其动态规律研究[J].林业科学研究,2002,15(2):143-149.
周文凤,晋陕蒙接壤地区水土保持的忧思[J].中国水土保持,1993(2):6-10.
高宇,樊军,彭小平,等.水蚀风蚀交错区典型植被土壤水分消耗和补充深度对比研究[J].生态学报,2014.34(23):7038-7046.
王建国,樊军,王全九,等.黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区植被地上生物量及其影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2011.22(3):556-564.
赵红梅,张发旺,宋亚新,等.神府东胜矿区不同塌陷阶段土壤水分变化特征[J].南水北调与水利科技,2008,6(3):92-96.
赵红梅,张发旺,宋亚新,等.大柳塔采煤塌陷区土壤含水量的空间变异特征分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报,2010,12(6):753-760.
0
浏览量
1135
下载量
8
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621