1. 甘肃省治沙研究所 甘肃省荒漠化与风沙灾害防治国家重点实验室培育基地,甘肃,兰州,730070
2. 甘肃民勤荒漠草地生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 甘肃 民勤,733300
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
孙涛, 韩福贵, 郭树江, 等. 干旱区不同生育期白刺灌丛沙堆土壤呼吸空间异质性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(6):102-109.
SUN Tao, HAN Fugui, GUO Shujiang, et al. Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Respiration of Nitraria Tangutorum Nebkhas During Different Growing Period in Arid Areas[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(6): 102-109.
孙涛, 韩福贵, 郭树江, 等. 干旱区不同生育期白刺灌丛沙堆土壤呼吸空间异质性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(6):102-109. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.06.017.
SUN Tao, HAN Fugui, GUO Shujiang, et al. Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Respiration of Nitraria Tangutorum Nebkhas During Different Growing Period in Arid Areas[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(6): 102-109. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.06.017.
[目的
]
对干旱区白刺灌丛沙堆不同生育期土壤呼吸空间异质性进行研究,为今后估算绿洲荒漠区土壤CO
2
排放量以及区域碳收支状况提供科学依据。[方法
]
利用Li-8100土壤呼吸测定系统,于2014年在巴丹吉林沙漠南缘绿洲-荒漠过渡带对白刺灌丛沙堆不同部位的土壤呼吸速率进行野外观测,分析沙堆上不同位点土壤呼吸日动态变化、不同生长时期的季节变化特征。[结果
]
(1)白刺灌丛沙堆在不同生长时期各部位土壤呼吸日动态变化曲线不同,生长初期和生长休眠期各部位日变化呈“单峰”曲线变化,在生长旺盛期各部位变化既有“单峰”曲线又有“双峰”曲线;同时,日变化峰值出现的时间不一致:生长初期各位点的峰值出现在上午11:00左右,旺盛期上午出现在10:00前后,下午出现在17:00左右,休眠期出现在下午14:00前后。(2)沙堆上不同部位土壤呼吸速率具有时空异质性,生长初期和休眠期各部位土壤呼吸速率异质性不显著(p>0.05),旺盛期各部位空间差异显著(p
<
0.01),异质性增强;沙堆各时期平均土壤呼吸速率差异显著(p
<
0.01),大小排序为:旺盛期 > 生长初期 > 生长休眠期。[结论
]
白刺灌丛沙堆上不同部位的土壤呼吸速率日动态变化在不同的生长时期表现不同,具有明显的时空异质性,主要是沙堆不同部位近地表层大气水分条件、土壤20 cm深处的温度和水分含量的差异共同作用导致了各个位点土壤呼吸通量具有明显的差异性。
[Objective] The spatial heterogeneity of soil respiration in different growing period of Nitraria tangutorum in dryland was demonstrated to provide a scientific basis for the estimation of CO2 emission and for the regional carbon budget in oasis.[Methods] Using Li-8100 soil respiration measurement system
we made field observation of soil respiration rate of Nitraria tangutorum nebkhas dominated dunes in 2014. The dunes located in the oasis-desert ecotone on the southern fringe of Badanjara Desert. We measured the daily change at different positions of Nitraria tangutorum along growing period
and studied the spatial heterogeneity of soil respiration of Nitraria tangutorum at different position and their seasonal variability.[Results] (1) The daily change of soil respiration rate of Nitraria tangutorum at different positions and in different growing period were different. It exhibited an unimodal variation both at the beginning of the growing period and at the dormancy season. In flourishing period
both unimodal and bimodal existed for daily respiration. Besides that
the peaks of soil respiration in different growth periods were different:the peak occurred at around 11:00 in beginning growth period
the peak of the flourishing period occurred at around 10:00 or 17:00. The peak in dormancy period delayed and occurred at 14:00. (2) There was different spatial heterogeneity of soil respiration rate at different positions on the sand mound. No significant difference(p>0.05) existed for the observations at different dune positions at the beginning of the growing period and at the dormancy period. Whereas there was a significant spatial difference(p<0.01) at the flourishing period.The average soil respiration rate at different growing period varied significantly
had a rank of flourishing period > beginning of the growing period > dormancy period.[Conclusion] Soil respiration rate of Nitraria tangutorum at different positions and in different growing period showed significantly spatial heterogeneity
which was mainly resulted from the interaction of near-surface water condition
the temperature and water content above 20 cm soil of Nitraria tangutorum at different positions.
王滔,吴增养,赵学理.陕西省山阳县地质灾害发育特征与移民选址原则[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2012,3(23):23-26.
郑苗苗,牛树轩,郑泓.基于GIS的延河流域滑坡崩塌地质灾害空间分布及其引发因素分析[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(2):156-160.
段钊,彭建兵,王启耀.泾阳南塬黄土滑坡运动规律与液化效应[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(3):46-49.
门玉明,荆万魁,杨向军.山阳中学滑坡治理可行性报告[R].陕西西安:长安大学,2003.
唐亚明.基于可靠度的黄土斜坡稳定性分析[J].地质通报,2008,8(27):1217-1222.
刘鑫,陈齐,吴树仁,等.陕西陇县李家下滑坡风险评价[J].地质通报,2008,27(6):895-903.
黄志全,孟令超,黄向春,等.基于数量化理论和BP神经网络的滑坡体积预测[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(5):207-213.
同霄,彭建兵,朱兴华,等.降雨作用下黄土浅层滑坡的危险性分析[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(3):109-113.
Scheidegger A E. On the prediction of the reach and velocity of catastrophic landslides[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 1973,5(4):231-236.
吴树仁,石菊松,王涛,等.滑坡风险评估理论与技术[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.
罗文强,黄润秋,张倬元.几种边坡可靠性数学模型的对比[J],山地学报,2000,18(1):42-46.
叶超,郝付军.基于支持向量机和BP神经网络的滑坡变形复合式预测[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(3):332-327.
张世林,孙金辉,马娇.数量化理论Ⅲ在川东红层岩质滑坡研究中的应用[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(2):140-145.
高波,王佳运,张成航,等.陕南勉县照壁山滑坡形成机制及风险评价[J].工程地质学报,2011,19(S):26-30.
梅保,陆玉梅.人的生命价值评估方法述评[J].中国安全科学学报,2007,17(3):56-60.
0
浏览量
1096
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621