内蒙古农业大学 水利与土木建筑工程学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010018
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
岳翠桐, 刘小燕, 刘廷玺, 等. 科尔沁沙坨地-草甸地冻融期地温与最大冻结深度的变化规律[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(6):84-91.
YUE Cuitong, LIU Xiaoyan, LIU Tingxi, et al. Change Rules of Soil Temperature and Maximum Freezing Depth During Freezing-thawing Period in Horqin Sand and Meadow Land[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(6): 84-91.
岳翠桐, 刘小燕, 刘廷玺, 等. 科尔沁沙坨地-草甸地冻融期地温与最大冻结深度的变化规律[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(6):84-91. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.06.015.
YUE Cuitong, LIU Xiaoyan, LIU Tingxi, et al. Change Rules of Soil Temperature and Maximum Freezing Depth During Freezing-thawing Period in Horqin Sand and Meadow Land[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(6): 84-91. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.06.015.
[目的
]
探究科尔沁沙坨地-草甸地土壤温度与冻结深度的变化规律,为合理指导该区农工生产和建设提供支持。[方法
]
基于2007-2015年冻融期人工观测数据,对比分析科尔沁沙坨地与草甸地冻融期多年土壤温度与最大冻结深度变化规律。[结果
]
研究区100 cm处沙坨地与草甸地多年土壤温度的标准差变化规律基本一致,草甸地要小于沙坨地,但融解后期由于草甸地融解期历时较长,其标准差大于沙坨地;同时考虑土壤温度和土壤水分对最大冻结深度的影响时,沙坨地在200 cm处和草甸地在140 cm处的R
2
分别为0.959和0.788。[结论
]
研究区内沙坨地先冻结与先融解,沙坨地最大冻结深度较草甸地深,同时考虑土壤温度与土壤水分的最大冻结深度的拟合优度最好,沙坨地与草甸地中最大冻结深度与土壤温度和土壤水分均呈负相关关系。
[Objective] The changes of soil temperature and maximum frozen depth in Horqin sand and meadow land were to provide support for reasonable guide of the agricultural production and construction.[Methods] Based on the artificial observation data from 2007 to 2015 during the freezing and thawing period
variability of soil temperature and maximum frozen depth in Horqin sand and meadow land were analyzed and compared during the freezing-thawing period.[Results] Changes of the standard deviation of soil temperature in sand and meadow land at 100 cm were basically the same
and values of meadow land were less than the ones of sand land. But the later melting period of meadow land lasted longer time
whereby its standard deviation was greater than the one of sand. Considering the impact of soil temperature and soil moisture on maximum frozen depth at the same time
the determinant coefficient of R2 at depth of 200 cm in sand and 140 cm in meadow land were 0.959 and 0.788
respectively.[Conclusion] Sand land froze and melted in advance in the study area
maximum frozen depth in sand was deeper than the one of meadow land. If soil temperature and soil moisture were considered at the same time
correlation coefficient to the maximum frozen depth was greater than the corresponding value of only single variable included. Soil temperature and soil moisture were negative correlated with the maximum frozen depth in sand and meadow land.
交通运输部.2014年交通运输行业发展统计公报[R].北京:交通运输部,2014.
刘春霞,韩烈保.高速公路边坡植被恢复研究进展[J].生态学报,2007,27(5):2090-2098.
郭小平,朱金兆,周心澄,等.植被护坡技术及其应用[J].中国水土保持科学,2004,2(4):112-116.
赵方莹,赵廷宁.边坡绿化与生态防护技术[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2009:58.
杨阳,杨建英,赵平,等.两种框格梁生态护坡技术及其应用效果:以安徽岳武高速公路为例[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(5):118-124.
耿志军,王永平.挂网客土喷播在山区旅游公路边坡绿化中的应用[J].公路交通科技:应用技术版,2010(10):402-404.
廖乾旭,李阿根,徐礼根,等.高速公路边坡生态恢复的问题与对策[J].中国水土保持科学,2006,12(4):100-102.
程福厚,赵岩丽,张纪英,等.盆栽梨树的耗水规律[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(6):45-49.
李吉跃,周平,招礼军.干旱胁迫对苗木蒸腾耗水的影响[J].生态学报,2002,22(9):1380-1386.
Bosabalidis A M, Kofidis G. Comparative effects of drought stress on leaf anatomy of two olive cultivars[J]. Plant Science, 2002, 163(2):375-379.
李芳兰,包维楷,吴宁.白刺花幼苗对不同强度干旱胁迫的形态与生理响应[J].生态学报,2009,29(10):5406-5416.
黄彩变,曾凡江,雷加强,等.不同灌溉量对头状沙拐枣幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2014,34(12):2500-2507.
蔡马,韩蕊莲,靳淑静,等.土壤干旱对黄土高原2种半灌木植物生长与耗水规律的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(6):26-32.
崔大练,马玉心.紫穗槐幼苗在不同干旱胁迫下生长特性的研究[J].林业科技,2010,35(3):1-3.
Petzold R, Kai S, Feger K H. Transpiration of a hybrid poplar plantation in Saxony(Germany) in response to climate and soil conditions[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2011, 130(5):695-706.
Du Sheng, Wang Yilong, Kume Tomonori, et al. Sapflow characteristics and climatic responses in three forest species in the semiarid Loess Plateau region of China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2011,151(1):1-10.
周自云,梁宗锁,刘启明.不同土壤水分条件对酸枣生物量与耗水特性的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2010,38(8):90-96,103.
喻晓丽,邸雪颖,宋丽萍.水分胁迫对火炬树幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J].林业科学,2007,43(11):57-61.
安玉艳,梁宗锁,郝文芳.杠柳幼苗对不同强度干旱胁迫的生长与生理响应[J].生态学报,2011,31(3):716-725.
答竹君,艾应伟,宋婷,等.道路边坡土壤水分空间和季节变异性分析[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(1):72-75.
0
浏览量
1101
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621