1. 北京林业大学 林学院,北京,100083
2. 北京松山国家级自然保护区管理处,北京,102115
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
朱嘉磊, 田菊, 孙宾, 等. 北京市松山天然油松林生态系统的碳储量[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(5):320-325.
ZHU Jialei, TIAN Ju, SUN Bin, et al. Carbon Storage of Natural Pinus Tabulaeformis Forest in Songshan Mountain in Beijing City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(5): 320-325.
朱嘉磊, 田菊, 孙宾, 等. 北京市松山天然油松林生态系统的碳储量[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(5):320-325. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.05.057.
ZHU Jialei, TIAN Ju, SUN Bin, et al. Carbon Storage of Natural Pinus Tabulaeformis Forest in Songshan Mountain in Beijing City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(5): 320-325. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.05.057.
[目的
]
分析北京市松山地区天然油松林生态系统碳储量,为研究区天然油松林的碳固定和碳储量管理研究提供理论依据。[方法
]
以北京市松山天然油松林生态系统为研对象,设置标准样地进行乔木。灌木。草本。凋落物调查,采集并分析0-100 cm土层土样,根据相关方程计算出生态系统以及各个层次的碳储量。[结果
]
植物体含碳率变化在42.39%~49.95%,0-100 cm土壤含碳率变化在0.26%~1.31%。天然油松生态系统碳储量为147.24 Mg/hm
2
,其中植被碳储量为57.14 Mg/hm
2
,占生态系统碳储量的36.7%,植被各层碳储量的顺序为乔木(54.93 Mg/hm
2
) > 灌木(0.45 Mg/hm
2
) > 草本(0.29 Mg/hm
2
);土壤碳储量为66.35 Mg/hm
2
,占生态系统碳储量的46.30%,分别是植被碳储量的1.16倍和凋落物碳储量的2.79倍,且随着土层深度的增加而递减;凋落物碳储量为23.75 Mg/hm
2
,占生态系统碳储量17%。[结论
]
松山地区天然乔木对植被碳储量的贡献率最大,松山地区天然油松林植被含碳率表现为:乔木 > 灌木 > 草本 > 凋落物。
[Objective] To study the carbon storage of natural Pinus tabulaeformis in order to provide theoretical basis for the management of carbon fixation and storage management in natural P. tabulaeformis forest in Songshan Mountain in Beijing City.[Methods] We set up standard plots in natural P. tabulaeformis forest
and sampled biomass of trees
shrubs
grasses and litter
and then collected soil samples at a depth of 0 to 100 cm. The correlative models were used to estimate the carbon storage of natural P. tabulaeformis forest ecosystem and different components.[Results] The vegetation carbon content changed from 42.39% to 49.95%
and it changed from 0.26% to 1.31% in the soil layer from 0 to 100 cm. The average carbon storage of P. tabulaeformis ecosystem was 147.24 Mg/hm2
and the average carbon storage in vegetation was 57.14 Mg/hm2
accounted for 36.7% of ecosystem carbon
carbon storage in each layer of the forest were trees(54.93 Mg/hm2) > shrub(0.45 Mg/hm2) > herb(0.29 Mg/hm2). The average soil carbon storage was 66.35 Mg/hm2
accounting for 46.30% of ecosystem carbon and 1.16 times the vegetation and 2.79 times litter carbon storage. The soil carbon content decreases with the increase of soil depth. Litter average carbon storage was 23.75 Mg/hm2
accounting for 17% of ecosystem carbon storage.[Conclusion] Natural forest in Songshan mountain area contributed most to vegetation carbon storage
and carbon content of natural P. tabulaeformis forest in Songshan mountain area vegetation follows an order of arbor > shrub > herb > litter.
殷海善,白中科.地下权和地上权:采矿土地的产权分析[J].中国土地科学,2008,22(8):65-68.
陈军,成金军.中国矿产资源开发利用的环境影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(3):111-119.
王干,白明旭.中国矿区生态补偿资金来源机制和对策探讨[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(5):75-82.
程烨.基本农田保护与采矿塌陷控制[J].中国土地科学,2004,18(3):9-12.
李启宇.矿产资源开发生态补偿机制研究述评[J].经济问题探索,2012(7):142-146.
Singh R N. Environmental catastrophes in the mining industry in Australia and the development of current management practices[J]. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 1999,47(12):339-343.
Linlin G E, Hsingchung C, Chris R. Monitoring land surface subsidence using radar interferometry:The challenges[C]//Shaping the Change 23rd FIG Congress. Munich, Germany, 2006.
Brown M A, Clarkson B D, Barton B J, et al. Implementing ecological compensation in New Zealand:Stakeholder perspectives and a way forward[J]. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2014,44(1):34-47.
文琦.中国矿产资源开发区生态补偿研究[J].生态学报,2014,34(21):6058-6066.
岑文.矿产资源开发对环境的影响及对策[J].中国高新技术企业评价,2014(23):128-129.
李璇琼.矿产资源开发对生态环境的影响研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2013.
朱英.阜康市煤炭资源开发生态补偿机制研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2013.
霍学喜,姚顺波,郭亚军.陕西省能源开发水土保持补偿标准研究[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2009.
宋戈,邹朝晖,王越.东北粮食主产区县域耕地产能核算及其影响因子分析[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(24):308-317.
韩茜.新疆煤炭资源开发生态补偿机制研究[J].新疆师范大学学报,2011,30(4):19-23.
高新才,斯丽娟.甘肃矿产资源开发生态补偿研究[J].城市发展研究,2011,18(5):8-12.
0
浏览量
1096
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621