1. 中国科学院 新疆生态与地理研究所,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830011
2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
张和钰, 周华荣, 叶琴, 等. 新疆额尔齐斯河流域典型地区优势种灌木的热值[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(5):299-305.
ZHANG Heyu, ZHOU Huarong, YE Qin, et al. Caloric Values of Dominant Plants in Typical Areas of Irtysh River Watershed in Xinjiang Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(5): 299-305.
张和钰, 周华荣, 叶琴, 等. 新疆额尔齐斯河流域典型地区优势种灌木的热值[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(5):299-305. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.05.054.
ZHANG Heyu, ZHOU Huarong, YE Qin, et al. Caloric Values of Dominant Plants in Typical Areas of Irtysh River Watershed in Xinjiang Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(5): 299-305. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.05.054.
[目的] 分析额尔齐斯河流域典型地区植物种类、器官和物种多样性对植物热值的影响及其相关性,为额尔齐斯河流域植被的生态恢复及生物多样性保护提供科学依据。[方法] 通过对额尔齐斯河流域典型地区主要灌木群落进行调查,测定优势种灌木热值。[结果] 研究区优势种灌木全株热值范围为15.20(心叶驼绒藜)~19.60 MJ/kg(圆叶桦),平均值为17.32 MJ/kg,该值与全球陆生植物平均热值相近;优势种灌木的全株热值顺序为:圆叶桦(Betula rotundifolia) > 金丝桃叶绣线菊(Spiraea hypericifolia) > 欧亚圆柏(Juniperus Sabina) > 西伯利亚刺柏(Juniperus sibirica) > 欧亚绣线菊(Spiraea media) > 金露梅(Potentilla fruticosa) > 尖刺蔷薇(Rosa oxyacantha) > 苦豆子(Sophora alopecuroides) > 淡枝沙拐枣(Calligonum leucocladum) > 驼绒藜(Krascheninnikovia ceratoides) > 红果沙拐枣(Calligonum rubicundum) > 柽柳(Tamarix chinensis) > 梭梭(Haloxylon ammodendron) > 心叶驼绒藜(Krascheninnikovia ewersmannia);热值与物种多样性指数、丰富度指数和均匀度指数呈正相关,与优势度指数呈负相关,但显著性非常差;研究区优势种灌木热值高于或与当前主要的生物质原材料相近。[结论] 额尔齐斯河流域典型地区优势种的植物热值较高,具有作为能源植物的潜力,可以为植被恢复和水土保持的先锋植物的选择参考,优势种的热值受植物种类、器官的影响,热值与物种多样性相关性差。
[Objective] To understand dominant shrub caloric value characteristics and study relationship between caloric value and species diversity index
in order to provide scientific basis for vegetation ecological restoration and biodiversity protection in typical areas of the Irtysh river watershed in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.[Methods] We determined the caloric value
calculated the diversity index of dominant species and analyzed the correlation between calorific value and diversity index.[Results] The caloric value ranged from 15.20 to 19.60 MJ/kg across all species
with a mean value of 17.32 MJ/kg
which is close to that of worldwide terrestrial plants. The caloric values of the dominant shrubs were in an order of Betula rotundifolia > Spiraea hypericifolia > Juniperus Sabina > Juniperus sibirica > Spiraea media > Potentilla fruticosa > Rosa oxyacantha > Sophora alopecuroides > Calligonum leucocladum > Krascheninnikovia ceratoides > Calligonum rubicundum > Tamarix chinensis > Haloxylon ammodendron > Krascheninnikovia ewersmannia. Calorific value was positively correlated with species diversity index
richness index and evenness index
and negatively correlated with dominance index
but not significantly. The calorific value of the dominant species in the study area is higher than that of the primary biomass raw material
which indicates that the shrub has a high calorific value.[Conclusion] The calorific value of dominant species of plants is higher
and has the potential as an energy plant. The dominant species can be used as a reference of pioneer plants for the vegetation restoration and soil and water conservation. The calorific value of dominant species is influenced by plant species and organs
and the correlation between caloric value and species diversity is poor.
Bouwman A F. Soil and the greenhouse effect[M]. Chichester, England:John Wily & Sons, 1990:78.
Cole. Agricultural options for mitigation of greenhouse gas emission[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1996.
刘英,赵荣钦,焦士兴.河南省土地利用碳源/汇及其变化分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(5):154-157.
赵荣钦,秦明周.中国沿海地区农田生态系统部分碳源/汇时空差异[J].生态与农村环境学报,2007,23(2):1-6.
袁再健,张京京,付亚男.河北省农田生态系统碳源/汇时空变化及其影响因素[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(6):206-210.
位贺杰,张艳芳,朱妮,等.陕西省关中地区农田生态系统碳源/汇估算[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(3):121-125.
伊犁哈萨克自治州统计局.伊犁哈萨克自治州统计年鉴2004-2014[M].伊犁哈萨克自治州统计局,2004-2014.
牛海生,李大平,张娜,等.不同灌溉方式冬小麦农田生态系统碳平衡研究[J].生态环境学报, 2014,23(5):749-755.
钱晓雍.上海农田生态系统碳源汇时空格局及其影响因素分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2011,30(7):1460-1467.
苏洋,马惠兰,颜璐.新疆农地利用碳排放时空差异及驱动机理研究[J].干旱区地理, 2013(6):1162-1169.
刘巽浩,徐文修,李增嘉,等.农田生态系统碳足迹法:误区。改进与应用:兼析中国集约农作碳效率[J].中国农业资源与区划,2013,34(6):1-11.
朱亚红,马燕玲,陈秉谱.甘肃省农地利用碳排放测算及影响因素研究[J].农业现代化研究,2014,35(2):248-252.
West T O, Marland G. A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture:Comparing tillage practices in the United States[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2002, 91(1):217-232.
李克让.土地利用变化和温室气体净排放与陆地生态系统碳循环[M].北京:气象出版社,2000:260-261.
段华平,张悦,赵建波,等.中国农田生态系统的碳足迹分析[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(5):203-208.
贺祥,顾欣,杨宗周.黔东南地区气候变化对能源消费碳排放的响应[J].绿色科技,2014(1):3-6.
王梁,赵杰,秦利,等.临沂市农田生态系统碳源/汇时空变化及其影响因素分析[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):183-187,237.
唐海明,汤文光,肖小平,等.中国农田固碳减排发展现状及其战略对策[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(7):1755-1759.
伍芬琳,李琳,张海林,等.保护性耕作对农田生态系统净碳释放量的影响[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(12):2035-2039.
崔红艳,许维成,孙毓民,等.有机肥对胡麻产量和品质的影响[J].核农学报,2014,28(3):518-525.
邵锋祥,屈小娥,席瑶.陕西省碳排放环境库兹涅茨曲线及影响因素:基于1978-2008年的实证分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(8):37-43.
罗海秀,王龙昌.基于ArcGIS的重庆市农田生态系统碳源/汇特征研究[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2015,40(3):91-97.
杨皓然,宋戈,杨光,等.潍坊市农田生态系统碳源(碳汇)及其碳足迹变化[J].湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版,2015,41(1):82-88.
0
浏览量
1061
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621