1. 中国科学院 新疆生态与地理研究所,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830011
2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
3. 新疆油田公司供水公司,新疆,克拉玛依,834000
4. 克拉玛依农林牧有限责任公司,新疆,克拉玛依,834000
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
刘赛, 蒋进, 李中邵, 等. 北疆引水干渠边坡生态恢复效果的调查与评价——以新疆克拉玛依市西干渠工程黄旗坝段为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(5):248-254.
LIU Sai, JIANG Jin, LI Zhongshao, et al. Effect of Slope Ecological Protection Measures in Northern Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region-Taking Canal Program in Western Part of Karamay in Huangqiba Section in Xijiang Region as a Case Study[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(5): 248-254.
刘赛, 蒋进, 李中邵, 等. 北疆引水干渠边坡生态恢复效果的调查与评价——以新疆克拉玛依市西干渠工程黄旗坝段为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(5):248-254. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.05.046.
LIU Sai, JIANG Jin, LI Zhongshao, et al. Effect of Slope Ecological Protection Measures in Northern Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region-Taking Canal Program in Western Part of Karamay in Huangqiba Section in Xijiang Region as a Case Study[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(5): 248-254. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.05.046.
[目的] 分析西干渠黄旗坝段边坡生态恢复效果,为调控植被演替速率和预期植被恢复效果提供依据。[方法] 对渠道开挖造成的阴坡、阳坡和渠道边坡坡顶上的自然生境下对照样地的土壤、植被状况进行了调查和分析。[结果] (1)经过生态恢复后的阴坡、阳坡植物的多度、盖度、均匀度指数Pielou、多样性指数Shannon-Wiener和丰富度指数Margalef均有所提高,阴坡高于阳坡,但仍低于自然生境下的水平。(2)在土壤氮、磷、钾养分特性方面,阴坡、阳坡的土壤氮、磷、钾养分均有所提高,但仍低于自然生境下的水平,呈现出自然生境 > 阴坡 > 阳坡的分布差异。(3)阴坡、阳坡经过生态恢复后植物群落指数仍偏低,群落演替仍处于灌草植物群落阶段。[结论] 边坡生态恢复技术能改善西干渠地区边坡的土壤养分状况,促进边坡植被的生长,但鉴于西干渠地区特殊的环境条件,短时间内生态恢复措施效果尚不明显,需加大长期的修复力度。另外,北疆地区边坡生态恢复中植物的选择应以当地乡土植物为主。
[Objective] The objective of this study is to analyze the effect of slope ecological protection measures in western part of Huangqiba section in northern of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region
in order to provide the scientific basis for regulating vegetation succession rate and expected vegetation restoration effect.[Methods] We investigated soil and vegetation conditions in the canal slopes caused by excavation and natural habitat at the top of channel.[Results] (1) After ecological restoration
the plant density
coverage
evenness index(Pielou)
diversity index(Shannon-Wiener) and richness index(Margalef) in the sunny and shady slope has been improved
and the improvement in shady slope was higher than in the sunny slope
but still lower than the natural habitats. (2) Soil nitrogen
phosphorus
potassium nutrient characteristics in both shady slope and sunny slope were increased
however
they were still lower than the level of natural habitats
which showed as:the natural habitat > shady slope > sunny slope. (3) After the ecological restoration
the plant community index of the shady and sunny slope was still low
and the community succession was still in the stage of shrub and grass plant community.[Conclusion] The slope ecological restoration technology can improve the soil fertility status and promote the growth of vegetation on the side slope. Due to the special environmental conditions of the west main canal area
short-term ecological restoration measures is not enough and long-term restoration is needed. In addition
native plants should be selected in the slope ecological restoration plant in the northern area of Xinjiang region.
刘林,王小平,孙瑞卿.半干旱黄土丘陵沟壑区沟道侵蚀特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(1):38-43.
虎陈霞,傅伯杰,陈利顶.浅析退耕还林还草对黄土丘陵沟壑区农业与农村经济发展的影响:以安塞县为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(4):67-72.
苏晓芳.黄土丘陵沟壑区空间贫困及其分异机制研究[D].银川:宁夏大学,2014.
张东为,贾天会,舒乔生.水保优良树种欧李的研究进展及今后研究方向[J].中国水土保持,2012,10(1):45-47.
马建军,于凤鸣,杜彬,等.欧李叶片过氧化物酶同工酶与叶果生理性状的相关性[J].经济林研究,2011,29(4):28-35.
孙晓丽,贾艳芳,高仪,等.欧李增殖培养基的优化研究[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(31):118-122.
李晓亮.欧李的营养成分测定与分析[J].农学学报,2015,5(8):97-100.
白秀梅,韩有志,郭汉清.关帝山不同植被恢复类型土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(2):79-84.
李民义,张建军,王春香,等.晋西黄土区不同土地利用方式对土壤物理性质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(3):125-130.
张瑞,苟晓敏,赵玉珍,等.东北黑土区土壤侵蚀对土壤持水性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(1):62-65.
孙中峰,张学培,刘卉芳,等.晋西黄土区坡面林地土壤持水性能研究[J].干旱区研究,2004,21(4):343-347.
李红,范素芳,张光灿,等.黄土丘陵区退耕还林后不同林地土壤孔隙与贮水特性[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(1):27-30.
王小红,杨智杰,刘小飞,等.天然林转换成人工林对土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳分布的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(6):177-182.
安韶山,黄懿梅,李壁成,等.黄土丘陵区植被恢复中土壤团聚体演变及其与土壤性质的关系[J].土壤通报,2006,37(1):45-50.
何淑勤,郑子成,宫渊波.不同退耕模式下土壤水稳性团聚体及其有机碳分布特征[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(5):229-233.
何淑勤,宫渊波,郑子成,等.不同植被类型条件下土壤抗蚀性变化特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(5):17-22.
Ghimire S K, Babel M S. Evaluation of erosion productivity impact calculator(EPIC) model for middle mountain region of Nepal[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research, 2004,19(2):106-122.
Sharply A N, Williams J R. EPIC erosion productivity impact calculator(1):Model documentation[M]. Washington D C:Department of Agriculture, 1990:20-28.
马云,何丙辉,何建林,等.三峡库区皇竹草植物篱对坡面土壤分形特征及可蚀性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(4):79-82.
0
浏览量
1119
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621