1. 中国地质大学 土地科学技术学院,北京,100083
2. 国土资源部 土地整治重点实验室,北京,100035
3. 国土资源部 土地整理中心,北京,100035
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
施园园, 赵华甫, 郧文聚, 等. 基于选择试验法的北京市城乡居民耕地保护支付意愿研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(5):178-184.
SHI Yuanyuan, ZHAO Huafu, YUN Wenju, et al. A Study on Willingness of Urban and Rural Residents to Pay for Cultivated Land Preservation Based on Choice Experiment Method[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(5): 178-184.
施园园, 赵华甫, 郧文聚, 等. 基于选择试验法的北京市城乡居民耕地保护支付意愿研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(5):178-184. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.05.036.
SHI Yuanyuan, ZHAO Huafu, YUN Wenju, et al. A Study on Willingness of Urban and Rural Residents to Pay for Cultivated Land Preservation Based on Choice Experiment Method[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(5): 178-184. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.05.036.
[目的] 测算北京市城乡居民耕地保护的支付意愿,检验二者的支付意愿差异,并分析差异形成的原因,为制定面向对象差异化的耕地保护政策提供理论借鉴。[方法] 采用选择试验法(CE),R统计及部分经济学模型。[结果] 农村居民对保护耕地面积、耕地质量和耕地景观生态环境的支付意愿分别为67.24,113.75,51.47元/a,而城镇居民的支付意愿分别为58.07,66.40,150.80元/a。[结论] 城镇居民的支付意愿明显高于农村居民,个体支付意愿与其文化程度、家庭年总收入、家庭抚养人口数显著相关;从二者耕地功能需求的角度看,城乡居民对耕地各项功能需求最高的分别为生态功能与生产功能,在需求差异的驱动下样本在选择集中做出符合自己需求偏好的选择。
[Objective] The aims of this study are to estimate the willingness of residents to pay for farmland protection in Beijing City
to investigate the differences of willingness between urban and rural residents
and analyze the driving factors that cause the differences
in order to provide the theory references for the development of object-oriented differentiated cultivated land protection policy.[Methods] Choice experiment(CE) method was employed. R statistical language software and econometric models was used.[Results] The amount of rural residents willing to pay for the protection of cultivated land area
quality and landscape ecological environment was 67.24
113.75 and 51.47 yuan per year
respectively
while the amount of urban residents willing to pay was 58.07
66.40 and 150.80 yuan per year
respectively.[Conclusion] The willingness of urban residents to pay for land protection was significantly higher than that of rural residents
individual's willingness to pay was positively related to their education
annual total income of household and dependent population in family. From the perspective of functional requirements
the highest demand for urban and rural residents were ecological function and production function
respectively
this difference in demand was driven by individual's preferences and needs.
王刚,贾冰.石羊河流域气候变化历史及其对水文水资源的影响[J].甘肃水利水电技术,2008(3):172-173.
周俊菊,石培基,师玮.1960-2009年石羊河流域气候变化及极端干湿事件演变特征[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(1):143-153.
范泽华,戚蓝,黃津辉.气候变化对石羊河流域水资源影响分析[J].水利水电技术,2012,43(1):7-11.
王文行,段争虎,王建伟.气候变化对祁连山石羊河出山口径流的影响研究[J].冰川冻土,2012,34(2):469-477.
李洋,魏晓妹,孙艳伟.石羊河流域水文要素变化特征分析[J].水文,2007,27(3):85-88.
丁贞玉,马金珠,张宝军,等.近50 a来石羊河流域气候变化趋势分析[J].干旱区研究,2007,24(6):6779-6784.
王兴梅,张勃,张凯,等.石羊河流域极端干旱事件的时空变化特征[J].地理科学进展,2011,30(3):299-305.
王贵忠.近50a来石羊河流域出山径流变化趋势分析[J].人民黄河,2010,32(8):45-46.
张若琳.石羊河流域水资源分布特征及其转化规律[D].北京:中国地质大学,2006.
王书功,康尔泗,李新.分布式水文模型的进展及展望[J].冰川冻土,2004,26(1):61-62.
朱发昇.石羊河流域水资源开发与生态环境综合治理探讨[J].水资源与水工程学报,2004,15(3):45-48.
刘明春,李玲萍,史志娟,等.石羊河流域径流量分布特征及对气候变化的响应:以西营河为例[J].干旱地区农业研究,2013(1):193-198.
费生云.石羊河流域综合治理战略性措施与对策研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2008.
袁军营,苏保林,李卉,等.基于SWAT模型的柴河水库流域径流模拟研究[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2010,46(3):361-365.
孙瑞,张雪芹.基于SWAT模型的流域径流模拟研究进展[J].水文,2010,30(3):28-32.
Abbaspour K C. SWAT-CUP4:A User Manual[S]. Dübendorf:Eawag, 2011.
Abbaspour K C, Johnson A M, Van Genuchten T. Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2004,3(1):1340-1352.
0
浏览量
1111
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621