内蒙古农业大学 草原与资源环境学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010020
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
石亮, 舒洋, 张波, 等. 不同龄组兴安落叶松林枯落物的水文效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(5):91-95.
SHI Liang, SHU Yang, ZHANG Bo, et al. Hydrological Effects of Litters in Xing'an Larch Forest at Different Stand Ages[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(5): 91-95.
石亮, 舒洋, 张波, 等. 不同龄组兴安落叶松林枯落物的水文效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(5):91-95. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.05.023.
SHI Liang, SHU Yang, ZHANG Bo, et al. Hydrological Effects of Litters in Xing'an Larch Forest at Different Stand Ages[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(5): 91-95. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.05.023.
[目的
]
分析大兴安岭地区不同龄组兴安岭落叶松林枯落物蓄积量持水特性,为该地区森林水文效应研究提供理论基础和重要依据。[方法
]
选择不同龄组兴安落叶松天然林为研究对象,通过设置标准样地测定枯落物蓄积量,并采用浸水法测定枯落物持水特性,分析不同龄组兴安落叶松天然林枯落物水文效应。[结果
]
4个龄组兴安落叶松林枯落物蓄积量变化介于28.03~34.32 t/hm
2
之间,最大持水量介于87.09~109.52 t/hm
2
,最大持水量表现为随着林龄增加而增加的变化趋势,且半分解层的蓄积量都大于未分解层;经统计分析,试验4个龄组兴安落叶松林枯落物未分解层、半分解层的持水量与浸泡时间之间均符合对数关系,且吸水速率与浸泡时间之间也符合指数关系;枯落物对降水的拦蓄能力总体来看,半分解层对降雨的拦蓄能力较未分解层强。[结论
]
大兴安岭地区不同龄组兴安落叶松林枯落物蓄积量差异显著(除成熟林和近熟林之间),成熟林、近熟林和中林龄对于降水的拦蓄能力较幼龄林强。
[Objective] In order to provide theoretical basis for forest hydrological effect study
the experiment was conducted to investigate the growing stock and water retention capability of forest litter at different stand ages group in Daxing'an Mountains.[Methods] We chose Xing'an forest larch with different stand ages as the object
and set the standard sample. The method of water immersion was used to measure the water retention capability of litter. We then calculated the effective retaining content and the maximum water-holding capacity.[Results] The litter volume of four different stand age groups was from 28.03 to 34.32 t/hm2
and the maximum water-holding capacity was from 87.09 to 87.09 t/hm2. The maximum water-holding capacity increased with the increase of litter volume
and the maximum water-holding capacity in the half-decomposed layer was greater than that in the undecomposed layer. By statistical analysis
there was a logarithmic relationship between water capacity of undecomposed and half-decomposed layer and immersion time
and there was an exponential relationship between water absorption rate and immersion time. Overall
the rainfall interception capacity of half-decomposed layer was better than that of undecomposed layer.[Conclusion] Significant difference has been found in forest litter volume among Xing'an larch with different ages excepting which of the mature forest and near-mature forest
the rainfall interception capacity of mature forest
near-mature forest and middle-aged forest was greater than that of young forest.
龚伟,胡庭兴,王景燕,等.川南天然常绿阔叶林人工更新后枯落物层持水特性研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(3):51-55.
常雅军,陈琦,曹靖,等.甘肃小陇山不同针叶林凋落物量。养分储量及持水特性[J].生态学报,2011,31(9):2392-2400.
Wilson K B, Hanson P J, Baldocchi D D. Factors controlling evaporation and energy partitioning beneath a deciduous forest over an annual cycle[J]. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 2000,102(2):83-103.
巩合德,王开运.森林水文生态效应及在川西亚高山针叶林群落中的研究[J].世界科技研究与发展,2003,25(5):41-46.
李良,翟洪波,姚凯,等.不同林龄华北落叶松人工林枯落物储量及持水特性研究[J].中国水土保持,2010(3):32-34.
刘向东,吴钦孝,赵鸿雁.黄土丘陵区油松人工林地土壤水分特征的研究[J].水土保持研究,1991(2):71-78.
周梅.大兴安岭落叶松林生态系统水文过程与规律研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2003.
赵鹏武,海龙,宋彩玲,等.大兴安岭北部兴安落叶松原始林倒木研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2010,24(3):173-177.
秦可珍,贺婷,包翔,等.不同火烧强度对兴安落叶松林土壤化学性质的影响[J].林业资源管理,2014(6):110-114.
张淑兰,张海军,张武,等.小兴安岭不同森林类型枯落物储量及其持水特性比较[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(4):85-90.
李红振,李凤日,贾炜玮,等.大兴安岭不同类型白桦落叶松混交林枯落物水源涵养功能[J].东北林业大学学报,2014,42(6):43-46.
牟雪,姜鹏,王卫军,等.北沟林场两种不同林分林下枯落物现存量及持水能力的研究[J].河北林果研究,2014,29(1):1-4.
潘明亮,丁访军,谭伟,等.贵州西部四种典型林地土壤水文特性研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):139-143.
徐洪亮,满秀玲,盛后财.大兴安岭不同类型落叶松天然林水源涵养功能研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):92-96.
赵阳,余新晓,吴海龙,等.华北土石山区典型森林枯落物层和土壤层水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(6):148-152.
张长伟,许文盛,李亚龙,等.湖南省紫鹊界梯田区人工林调落物持水性[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(4):176-179.
王茜.冀北山区不同森林类型水文效应研究[D].石家庄:河北农业大学,2013.
徐学华,崔立志,王锡武,等.不同经营措施对冀北山地华北落叶松林枯落物持水性能的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(3):157-161.
0
浏览量
991
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621