1. 湖北文理学院 建筑工程学院,湖北,襄阳,441053
2. 湖北工业大学 土木建筑与环境学院,湖北,武汉,430068
3. 深圳万信达生态环境股份有限公司,广东,深圳,518045
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
叶建军, 朱兆华, 魏道江, 等. 碎砖和陶粒配制的拓展型屋顶绿化基材栽种景天植物对比试验[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(5):151-155.
YE Jianjun, ZHU Zhaohua, WEI Daojiang, et al. Comparative Study on Planting Sedum Plants in Extensive Green Roof Substrates Made of Crushed Brick and Ceramsite[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(5): 151-155.
叶建军, 朱兆华, 魏道江, 等. 碎砖和陶粒配制的拓展型屋顶绿化基材栽种景天植物对比试验[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(5):151-155. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.05.005.
YE Jianjun, ZHU Zhaohua, WEI Daojiang, et al. Comparative Study on Planting Sedum Plants in Extensive Green Roof Substrates Made of Crushed Brick and Ceramsite[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(5): 151-155. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.05.005.
[目的
]
对比建筑垃圾和陶粒配制的拓展型屋顶绿化基材栽种景天植物的效果,为相关的研究提供参考。[方法
]
采用酒糟(5%)、表土(10%)、河沙(25%)、复合肥(4 kg/m
3
)以及60%陶粒或55%碎砖、5%碎石灰石配制的2种屋顶绿化基材,现场栽种2种流行的景天植物垂盆草(Sedum Sarmentosum)和佛甲草(Sedum Linare);在18个月内考察植物盖度、植物干重、基材养分含量的变化。[结果
]
建筑垃圾基材栽种的植物的盖度和干重大于或等于陶粒基材;建筑垃圾基材的磷、钾养分含量减少与陶粒基材无显著差异,氮养分含量减少量小于陶粒基材;佛甲草的盖度和干重显著高于垂盆草。[结论
]
建筑垃圾配制的拓展型屋顶绿化基材能取得比陶粒配制的基材更好的绿化效果,可以取代陶粒用于配制屋顶绿化基材。
[Objective] The objective of the study is to compare the effects of planting sedum plants in green roof substrates made of crushed brick and ceramsite in order to provide the reference for related research.[Methods] With two types of extensive green roof substrate mixed by using 5% distillers' grains
10% top soil
25% sand
compound fertilizer(4 kg/m3) and 60% ceramsite
or 55% crushed brick and 5% lime stone
we planted two popular Sedum species(Sedum sarmentosum
SS; Sedum Linare
SL) in them
and then investigated coverage and dry weights of plants
and nutrient content(total nitrogen
TN; total phosphorus
TP; and total kalium
TK) in substrate within 18 months.[Results] Plant coverage and dry weights from substrate made of crushed brick were greater or equal to those from substrate made of ceramsite
while the decreases of TP and TK in two substrates did not differ from each other significantly
TN in substrate made of crushed brick reduced less than substrate made of ceramsite. The coverage and dry weights of SS were significantly higher than those of SL.[Conclusion] Green roof plants grow better in the green roof substrate made of crushed brick than substrate made of ceramsite
and thus can replace ceramsite in mixing green roof substrate.
Forschungsgesellschaft Landschaftsentwickung Landschaftsbau Troisdorf. Guidelines for the planning, construction and maintenance of green roofing:Green roofing guideline[M], Germany:FLL, 2008.
Mentens J, Raes D, Hermy M. Green roofs as a tool for solving the rainwater runoff problem in the urbanized 21st century?[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006,77(3):217-226.
Dunnett N, Kingsbury N. Planting Green Roofs and Living Walls[M]. Portland, USA:Timber Press, 2004.
叶建军,余世孝,刘文利,等.屋顶绿化初绿化基材配方研究[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(4):157-162.
叶建军.屋顶绿化的植物筛选及生态服务功能研究[D].广州:中山大学,2013.
Molineux C J, Fentiman C H, Gange A C. Characterising alternative recycled waste materials for use as green roof growing media in the UK[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2009,35(10):1507-1513.
Ye Jianjun, Liu Chuanyin, Zhao Zichao, et al. Heavy metals in plants and substrate from simulated extensive greens roofs[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013,55(2):29-34.
叶建军,许文年,余世孝.屋顶绿化系统及绿化方法:中国,ZL200910063086.1[P].2009-12-23.
Teemusk A, Mander U. Greenroof potential to reduce temperature fluctuations of a roof membrane:A case study from Estonia[J]. Building and Environment, 2009,44(3):643-650.
周媛,徐冬云,董艳芳,等.9种轻型屋顶绿化景天属植物的抗旱性研究[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(25):294-301.
0
浏览量
1051
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621