1. 三峡大学 生物与制药学院,湖北,宜昌,443002
2. 三峡地区地质灾害与生态环境湖北省协同创新中心,湖北,宜昌,443002
3. 土木与建筑学院,湖北,宜昌,443002
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
薛海龙, 许文年, 刘大翔. 两种边坡生态修复模式土壤肥力与酶活性的变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(4):182-187.
XUE Hailong, XU Wennian, LIU Daxiang. Changes of Soil Fertility and Enzyme Activity on Different Standing Conditions Under Two Slope Ecological Restoration Patterns[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(4): 182-187.
薛海龙, 许文年, 刘大翔. 两种边坡生态修复模式土壤肥力与酶活性的变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(4):182-187. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.04.032.
XUE Hailong, XU Wennian, LIU Daxiang. Changes of Soil Fertility and Enzyme Activity on Different Standing Conditions Under Two Slope Ecological Restoration Patterns[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(4): 182-187. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.04.032.
[目的] 研究不同修复技术处理对边坡土壤酶活性的长期影响,以期为土壤地力培育提供理论依据。[方法] 以向家坝水电站工程扰动区代表性的天然次生林以及人工次生林为基础,测定不同坡位以及坡向土壤酶活性,探讨土壤酶活性的变化规律,分析酶活性与其他肥力因子间的相互关系。[结果] 不论阴坡还是阳坡,两种林地坡面地形部位(上坡位、中坡位、下坡位),除土壤pH值降低以外,下坡位肥力因子均显著提高1.1倍以上,酶活性水平与肥力因子变化基本一致。除过氧酶活性增长不显著外,磷酸酶活性增长91.67%~116.67%,脲酶活性增长5.3%~30.01%,蔗糖酶活性增长1.38~1.56倍;阴坡各项指标均高于阳坡,除过氧酶以外,都增长显著。相关性分析表明,两种修复技术下,碱性磷酸酶、脲酶、蔗糖酶两两之间的正相关关系均达到极显著水平,但与过氧化氢酶活性之间相关性均不显著。[结论] 研究区肥力因子总体上呈现空间分布不均匀,沿着坡体从上至下依次增加,北坡高南坡低的趋势,说明坡位坡向影响着土壤内环境的变化进程,因此对于此类边坡坡顶和阳面的二次修复,适当追肥可以更好地进行地力培育和生态修复。
[Objective] The long-term effects of ecological rehabilitation patterns on soil enzyme activity on different standing conditions was studied to provide theory for soil cultivation and remediation. [Methods] A secondary forest and an artificial forest in disturbed area of Xiangjiaba hydropower station were selected as studying sites to measure soil enzyme activities in different slope position and slope exposure and to analyze the relationships between enzymatic activity and other fertility factors. [Results] Except of soil pH value
nutrition level in the lower slope was relatively high in comparison with that at upper and middle slope positions
it was 1.1 times or higher of the levels of the latter two positions. The changes of enzymatic activity was coincided with the indices of soil fertility along different slope positions. Excepting for the slight change of peroxide enzyme activity
other enzymes were all obvious. Among which
phosphatase activity at lower slop position increased 91.67%~116.67% in contrast with the one at upper position urease activity increased 5.3%~5.3%
and invertase activity increased 1.38~1.56 times. In terms of the enzymatic changes of slope exposure
except of peroxide enzyme
other enzymatic activates in shady slope behaved better than the ones in sunny slope. Correlation analysis showed that the correlations between alkaline phosphatase
urease and invertase were significant with each other. The correlations of catalase were not significant with the above three enzymes. [Conclusion] For soil fertility factors
an overall increasing trend from up slope to down slope
and a comparative high in northern slope exposure were both tested. Implying that standing condition can affect the process of soil internal environment. Therefore
for the remediation of upper slope and sunny slope
appropriate fertilization might make the cultivation of soil fertility and the ecological habitation better.
周明涛,许文年,夏栋.向家坝水电站工程扰动区不同类型边坡土壤酸碱度与肥力分析[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(4):1031-1037.
李少丽,许文年,丰瞻,等.边坡生态修复中植物群落类型设计方法研究[J].中国水土保持,2007(12):53-55.
许小娟,朱凯华,尹金珠,等.海岛矿山生态修复边坡植物多样性分析[J].北方园艺,2011(7):106-109.
杨晓军.采石场岩质边坡植被生态恢复效果的调查评价[D].江苏 南京:南京农业大学,2012.
付靖,张晓龙,祝小科.贵州公路陡峭岩石边坡生态修复技术效果分析[J].西部交通科技,2013(1):69-74.
Qiu Liping,ZHANG Xingchang,Cheng Jiming. Influence of slope direction, position and fallow measurement of soil enzymatic activities in grassland at Yunwu Mountain[J].Acta Prateculturae Sinica, 2007,16(1):87-93.
周玮,周运超.北盘江喀斯特峡谷区不同植被类型的土壤酶活性[J].林业科学,2010,46(1):136-141.
Zhao Rudong, Fan Jianbo, He Yuanqiu, et al. Effect of slope position on soil physicochemical in
Pinus massoniana
plantation[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2010,19(12):2857-2862.
成毅,安韶山,马云飞.宁南山区不同坡位土壤微生物生物量和酶活性的分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(5):148-153.
秦华军,何丙辉,赵璇池,等.西南喀斯特山区寿竹林地土壤微生物量与酶活性在不同坡位和剖面层次的分布特征[J].环境科学,2014,35(9):3580-3586.
鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999.
Tabatabai M, Bremner J. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1969,1(4):301-307.
刘大翔,许文年,周明涛,等.坡位坡向及年限对黄龙滩电站生态护坡肥力的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(1):178-182.
邱现奎,董元杰,万勇善,等.不同施肥处理对土壤养分含量及土壤酶活性的影响[J].土壤,2010,42(2):249-255.
万超,徐福利,邹诚,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同土地利用模式对土壤酶活性和土壤微生物影响研究[J].西北农业学报,2009,18(2):158-162.
曹志平.土壤生态学[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2007.
明安刚,陶怡,吴光枝,等.不同坡位米老排人工林生长量与生物量的研究[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(28):90-93.
路怡青,朱安宁,张佳宝,等.免耕和秸秆还田对小麦生长期内土壤酶活性的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报,2013,29(3):329-334.
丁永全.坡向和坡位对大兴安岭干旱阳坡蒙古栎林温湿度的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2015,43(4):46-51.
0
浏览量
1149
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621