南京农业大学 公共管理学院,江苏,南京,210095
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
夏敏, 张智超, 文博, 等. 苏南地区土地利用的生态敏感性分区[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(4):112-117.
XIA Min, ZHANG Zhichao, WEN Bo, et al. Ecological Sensitive Zoning of Land Use in Southern Jiangsu Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(4): 112-117.
夏敏, 张智超, 文博, 等. 苏南地区土地利用的生态敏感性分区[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(4):112-117. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.04.020.
XIA Min, ZHANG Zhichao, WEN Bo, et al. Ecological Sensitive Zoning of Land Use in Southern Jiangsu Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(4): 112-117. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.04.020.
[目的] 开展土地生态敏感性分区研究,剖析区域不同土地利用方式下土地生态环境状况,为区域土地利用规划等提供依据。[方法] 以苏南地区典型城市宜兴市作为研究区,采用USLE与景观安全格局方法划分水土流失敏感区和生物多样性敏感区,进而得到宜兴市土地利用的生态敏感区。[结果] 宜兴市土地利用生态敏感程度总体较低,一般敏感区与低敏感区面积接近区域总面积68.17%,极敏感区分布集中,敏感等级由南部山区向北部平原逐步降低。[结论] USLE与景观安全格局相结合进行土地利用的生态敏感性分区研究,可以发挥两者的长处,综合和定量分析不同因素对区域生态环境的影响。
[Objective] Land ecological sensitive zoning was comprehensively analyzed under different land use type to provide reference for regional land use planning. [Methods] Yixing City
a typical city in Southern Jiangsu Province was taken as an example
its land use ecological sensitive zones were divided according to the zones of soil and water loss sensitivity and biodiversity preservation priority using USLE model and landscape security pattern. [Results] The ecological sensitivity in Yixing City was thought relatively low. The zones with extremely high sensitivity accounted only for 7.87% of the total area
the zones with high sensitivity
moderate sensitivity and low sensitivity covered 23.96%
35.71% and 32.46%
respectively. The zones with extremely high sensitivity were clustered together in space. Sensitivity declined gradually from the southern hill district to the northern plain district. [Conclusion] The application of USLE model combined with landscape security pattern can comprehensively recognize the factors that influence ecological sensitivity
and quantitatively grade the land use ecological sensitive zones.
吴金华,李纪伟,朱鸿儒.基于ArcGIS区统计的延安市土地生态敏感性评价[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(7):1180-1188.
史培军,江源,王静爱.土地利用覆被变化与生态安全响应机制[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
沈清基,徐溯源,刘立耘,等.城市生态敏感区评价的新探索:以常州市宋剑湖地区为例[J].城市规划学刊,2011(1):58-66.
吴克宁,韩春建,冯新伟,等.基于3S技术的土地生态敏感性分区研究[J].土壤,2008,40(2):293-298.
史小惠.榆林地区土地生态敏感性时空动态分析[D].陕西 西安:长安大学,2013.
李军,曹明明,邱海军,等.基于GIS的西安市土地生态环境敏感性评价研究[J].西北大学学报:自然科学版,2014,44(1):121-126.
杨月圆,王金亮,杨丙丰.云南省土地生态敏感性评价[J].生态学报,2008,28(5):2253-2260.
帅红,李景保.南方小型矿业城镇土地生态敏感性评价:以湖南省桂阳县为例[J].热带地理,2010,30(3):323-236.
颜磊,许学工,谢正磊,等.北京市域生态敏感性综合评价[J].生态学报,2009,29(6):3117-3125.
吴剑,陈鹏,文超祥,等.基于探索性空间数据分析的海坛岛土地利用生态风险评价[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(7):2056-2062.
潘影,刘云慧,王静,等.基于CLUE-S模型的密云县面源污染控制景观安全格局分析[J],生态学报,2011,31(2):0529-0537.
姚妤,张沛,严力蛟,等.基于RUSLE和景观安全格局的土壤侵蚀风险格局研究:以甘肃省甘南藏族自治州迭部县为例[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(3):161-167.
许妍,高俊峰,赵家虎.基于GIS的太湖流域主要生态风险源危险度综合评价研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(3):335-343.
A. Ugur Ozcan, Gunay Erpul, Mustafa Basaran, et al. Use of USLE/GIS technology integrated with geostatistics to assess soil erosion risk in different land uses of Indagi Mountain Pass-Cankiri, Turkey[J]. Environmental Geology, 2008,53(8),1731-1741.
周伏建,陈明华,林福兴,等.福建省降雨侵蚀力指标的初步探讨[J].亚热带水土保持,1989(2):58-60.
吕喜玺,沈荣明.土壤可蚀性因子
K
值的初步研究[J].水土保持学报,1992,6(1):63-70.
Hickey R S A, Jankowski P. Slope length calculations from a DEM within ARC/INFO GRID. Computers[J]. Environment and Urban Systems, 1994,18(5):365-380.
张岩,袁建平,刘宝元.土壤侵蚀预报模型中的植被覆盖与管理因子研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(8):1033-1036.
黄金良,洪华生,张珞平,等.基于GIS和USLE的九龙江流域土壤侵蚀量预测研究[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(5):75-79.
文博,刘友兆,夏敏.基于景观安全格局的农村居民点用地布局优化[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(8):181-191.
0
浏览量
1016
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621