1. 山西大学 资源与环境工程研究所,山西,太原,030006
2. 山西水利职业技术学院,山西,运城,044004
3. 西北旱区生态水利工程国家重点实验室培育基地,陕西,西安,710048
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
张晨, 白继中, 刘璐瑶. 干旱和半干旱流域水环境质量评价模型及其应用[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(4):36-40.
ZHANG Chen, BAI Jizhong, LIU Luyao. Evaluation Models and Its Application of Water Environment Quality and Health Status in Arid and Semi Arid Basins[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(4): 36-40.
张晨, 白继中, 刘璐瑶. 干旱和半干旱流域水环境质量评价模型及其应用[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(4):36-40. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.04.007.
ZHANG Chen, BAI Jizhong, LIU Luyao. Evaluation Models and Its Application of Water Environment Quality and Health Status in Arid and Semi Arid Basins[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(4): 36-40. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.04.007.
[目的] 通过建立模型修复水生态系统,评价流域水环境质量,为生态系统修复提供实用工具。[方法] 以涑水河流域为例,采用了层次分析法(AHP),同时运用模糊隶属函数和综合指数法对影响水质因子的各个指标进行综合评价分析,建立干旱和半干旱流域水环境质量健康评价体系及评价模型。[结果] 涑水河流域2008-2011年水环境质量健康评价结果为Ⅲ级,状态一般,较健康,评价结果与实际生态情况相符。[结论] 所建立的干旱和半干旱流域水环境质量健康评价体系是合理的,能满足流域水环境质量健康评价需要。
[Objective] The water quality of the river basin was evaluated through the establishment of related models in order to provide practical tool for ecosystem restoration. [Methods] Using analytic hierarchy process(AHP)
fuzzy membership function and comprehensive index method
taking Sushui river basin as a study area
factors that influences water quality indexes were evaluated comprehensively. Evaluation system of water environment quality and was established and the models of the environmental health in arid and semi arid river basin was illustrated. [Results] In Sushui river basin from 2008 to 2011
the water quality environment was categorized as grade Ⅲ
at a status of ordinary health. The evaluation results were commonly the real status. [Conclusion] The health evaluation system of water environment quality in that arid and semi arid river basin proved reasonable
can meet the needs of health assessment of water environment quality in river basin.
王波,梁婕鹏.基于不同空间尺度的河流健康评价方法探讨[J].长江科学院院报,2011,28(12):32-35.
Barbour M T, Gerritsen J, Snyder B D, et al. Rapid Bio-assessment Protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinver tebrates and Fish [M]. Washington D C:EPA841-B-99-002. US. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, 1999.
Karr J R. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities [J]. Fisheries, 1981,6(6):21-27.
Martin Griffiths.欧盟水框架指令手册[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.
Kim J H, Oh H M, Kim I S, et al. Ecological health assessments of an urban lotic ecosystem using a multimetric model along with physical habitat and chemical water quality assessments[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research, 2013, 7(3):759-768.
曾小瑱,车越,吴阿娜.3种河流健康综合性评价方法的比较[J].中国给水排水,2007,23(4):92-96.
Wright J F, Sutcliffe D W, Furse M T. Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS, and other techniques[J]. Blood, 2000, 99(10):3493-3499.
Smith M J, Kay W R, Edward D H D, et al. AusRivAS: Using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological condition of rivers in Western Australia[J]. Freshwater Biology, 1999, 41(2):269-282.
Wright J F, Armitage P D, Furse M T. Prediction of invertebrate communities using stream measurements [J]. Regul Rivers: Research & Management, 1989,4(2):147-155.
董哲仁.国外河流健康评估技术[J].水利水电技术,2005,36(11):15-19.
唐涛,蔡庆华,刘建康.河流生态系统健康及其评价[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(9):1191-1194.
李成,吴谦,胡满.风险综合评价中指标权重确定方法对比研究[J].石油工业技术监督,2016,32(1):50-53.
武俊娴,毕如田,刘庚,等.基于DEM的涑水河流域地表水文特征模拟与分析[J].山西农业大学学报:自然科学版,2009,29(5):397-399.
0
浏览量
1029
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621