1. 潍坊市水文局,山东,潍坊,261061
2. 宁夏大学 农学院,宁夏,银川,750021
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
潘星慧, 李连胜, 张萍. 山东省潍坊市公路建设项目水土保持损益分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(3):245-248.
PAN Xinghui, LI Liansheng, ZHANG Ping. Benefit and Loss Analysis on Soil and Water Conservation for Roads Construction Projects in Weifang City of Shandong Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(3): 245-248.
潘星慧, 李连胜, 张萍. 山东省潍坊市公路建设项目水土保持损益分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(3):245-248. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.03.042.
PAN Xinghui, LI Liansheng, ZHANG Ping. Benefit and Loss Analysis on Soil and Water Conservation for Roads Construction Projects in Weifang City of Shandong Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(3): 245-248. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.03.042.
[目的] 通过山东省潍坊市公路建设项目的水土保持损益分析,评价当地公路建设项目的水土保持影响程度。[方法] 以潍坊地区S220,S221,S321和S327这4个公路建设项目为例,应用水土流失影响指数评价模型定量计算其水土流失影响指数(SWⅡ)。[结果] S220,S221,S321和S327的水土流失影响指数(SWⅡ)分别为0.194 2,0.158 8,0.175 8,0.167 1,全部低于全国公路项目SWⅡ的平均值,表明潍坊地区公路项目建设造成的水土流失影响程度要低于全国平均水平。其主要原因是:平均项目占地面积(4.82 hm
2
/km)和影响范围(0.91 hm
2
/km)较小,土石方挖填量(5.06×10
4
m
3
/km)和弃渣量(400 m
3
/km)较少,影响时间(21个月)短,水土流失总量(437 t/km)不大。[结论] 针对不同的公路建设项目,可通过减少项目的占地面积和影响范围,减少工程的土石方挖填量,特别是增加水土流失治理面积,来进一步减弱工程建设带来的水土流失影响。
[Objective] Based on the analysis on benefit and loss of soil and water conservation for provincial roads construction projects in Weifang City of Shandong Province to evaluate the influence degree of soil and water conservation of the local provincial roads construction projects.[Methods] Taking 4 different highways(S220
S221
S321 and S327) in Weifang area as an example
the soil and water loss impact indices(SWⅡ) for four provincial roads construction projects were quantitatively analyzed and evaluated.[Results] The SWⅡ of S220
S221
S321 and S327 was 0.194 2
0.158 8
0.175 8 and 0.167 1
respectively
which was lower than the average SWⅡ value of national highway construction project in China. The results indicated that the impacts of soil and water loss caused by highway construction project in Weifang City were lower than the national average level. The main reason for the low SWⅡ in Weifang was that the average occupation land area(4.82 hm2/km) and influence extent(0.91 hm2/km) was smaller and the earth excavation and filling volume(5.06×104 m3/km) and waste residue(400 m3/km) was less
the influence time was shorter (21 months) and the amount of soil and water loss(437 t/km) was less.[Conclusion] For different highway projects
to reduce their impacts on soil and water loss
the construction area and earthwork volume should be reduced. Specifically
by increasing the soil erosion conservation area can mitigate the impact of project construction on soil and water loss and can protect the eco-environment.
国家发改委.国家公路网规划(2013-2030年)[Z].2013.
张峥,陈吉虎,姜德文,等.高速公路项目水土流失影响指数的应用研究[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(2):116-119.
史东梅.高速公路建设中侵蚀环境及水土流失特征的研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(2):5-9.
刘贵滨,汪莉.高速公路建设中边坡水土流失的监测与防治[J].山东交通科技,2009(1):58-61.
姜德文.开发建设项目水土保持损益分析研究[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.
姜德文.以科学发展观建立开发建设项目水土保持损益评价体系[J].中国水土保持,2005(6):5-7.
姜德文.运用水土流失影响指数评价主体工程设计及水土保持方案[J].中国水土保持,2010(12):4-6.
胡晋茹,李元,曹子龙.海南高速公路水土保持损益分析[J].安徽农业科学,2013,41(28):11474-11476.
何吉成,徐雨晴,刘兰花.我国长大客运专线建设工程的水土流失影响指数比较[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(6):35-38.
0
浏览量
1003
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621